Evaluating the Formal Independence of National Regulatory Authorities in the European Union’s Energy Sector and Beyond

Q4 Social Sciences Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu Pub Date : 2022-10-24 DOI:10.3935/zpfz.72.5.02
Aleš Ferčič
{"title":"Evaluating the Formal Independence of National Regulatory Authorities in the European Union’s Energy Sector and Beyond","authors":"Aleš Ferčič","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.72.5.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European Union’s energy law stipulates numerous obligations with the intention of achieving a desired level of independence of national regulatory authorities. This article offers an insight into the said obligations as well as into their development and their evaluation. The latter is carried out via two sound benchmarks, i.e. via Gilardi’s test and via the new comprehensive independence test. The new test learns from its antecedents, particularly from the methodological point of view. However, it advocates stricter requirements and, consequently, higher independence standards as developed in the most recent regulatory practice and theory. The evaluation of the past and present supranational legal framework in the field of energy reveals a decent progress on the subject of the formal independence of national regulatory authorities but unfortunately also a significant untapped potential which must be considered when drafting the new supranational rules. Moreover, it can be considered when transposing the new Electricity Directive in the national legal system since in the discussed field the directive in question ‘merely’ aims to achieve a minimal harmonization. And last but not least, lessons learned from the discussed case are transferable to other economic sectors, in particular to (other) utilities sectors.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.72.5.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

European Union’s energy law stipulates numerous obligations with the intention of achieving a desired level of independence of national regulatory authorities. This article offers an insight into the said obligations as well as into their development and their evaluation. The latter is carried out via two sound benchmarks, i.e. via Gilardi’s test and via the new comprehensive independence test. The new test learns from its antecedents, particularly from the methodological point of view. However, it advocates stricter requirements and, consequently, higher independence standards as developed in the most recent regulatory practice and theory. The evaluation of the past and present supranational legal framework in the field of energy reveals a decent progress on the subject of the formal independence of national regulatory authorities but unfortunately also a significant untapped potential which must be considered when drafting the new supranational rules. Moreover, it can be considered when transposing the new Electricity Directive in the national legal system since in the discussed field the directive in question ‘merely’ aims to achieve a minimal harmonization. And last but not least, lessons learned from the discussed case are transferable to other economic sectors, in particular to (other) utilities sectors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估欧盟能源部门及其他领域国家监管机构的正式独立性
欧盟的能源法规定了许多义务,目的是实现国家监管机构的理想独立性。本文提供了对上述义务及其发展和评估的深入了解。后者是通过两个健全的基准进行的,即通过Gilardi测试和通过新的综合独立性测试。新的测试从它的前身中学习,特别是从方法论的角度来看。然而,它主张更严格的要求,因此,在最近的监管实践和理论中发展出更高的独立性标准。对能源领域过去和现在的超国家法律框架的评价表明,在国家监管当局的正式独立这一主题上取得了不错的进展,但不幸的是,在起草新的超国家规则时也必须考虑到尚未开发的重大潜力。此外,当在国家法律体系中转换新的电力指令时,可以考虑它,因为在讨论的领域中,所讨论的指令“仅仅”旨在实现最小的协调。最后但并非最不重要的是,从所讨论的案例中吸取的教训可以转移到其他经济部门,特别是(其他)公用事业部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Obiteljsko nasilje u svjetlu penalnog populizma Izazovi posebnog dijela kaznenog prava zbog razvoja umjetne inteligencije uz poseban osvrt na hrvatsko kazneno pravo O sukobu načela transparentnosti i prava na tajnost podataka u pravu javne nabave Republike Hrvatske Ovrha na virtualnim valutama Socijalne i ekonomske odredbe u pravnom poretku Banovine Hrvatske
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1