Assessment of Bronchodilator Response in Children with Asthma Exacerbation Using the Respiratory Resistance Values

M. Bautista, J. Vossoughi, A. Johnson, M. Keszler
{"title":"Assessment of Bronchodilator Response in Children with Asthma Exacerbation Using the Respiratory Resistance Values","authors":"M. Bautista, J. Vossoughi, A. Johnson, M. Keszler","doi":"10.4236/ojrd.2021.114011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sixty-four pediatric patients \nwith asthma exacerbation were studied. The children \nwere subjected to respiratory resistance evaluation using the Airflow \nPerturbation Device (APD) and spirometry evaluation. They were then administered albuterol and 15 minutes later the APD and \nspirometry evaluations were repeated. Eleven of the children could not \nperform spirometry. The APD results \ndemonstrated that respiratory resistance of the patients decreased by about \n20%, indicating that the APD could detect the expected response to \nbronchodilator. However, no similar conclusion could be made with the \nspirometry parameters (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25% - \n75%) performed on the same patients. The differences on the spirometry \nparameters did not change significantly \nbefore and after bronchodilator administration. Furthermore, these \ndifferences were negligibly increased or decreased for some with no consistency \nbetween the FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25% - 75%. Even though all the children \nwere clinically improved after albuterol administration and discharged home, \nthis could not be demonstrated by spirometry data. This study validates \nprevious reports that spirometry is not a reliable pulmonary diagnostic tool \nfor young children, as spirometry is highly effort-dependent and requires a \nsubstantial degree of patient cooperation. APD on the other hand is a reliable, \nsimple, effortless diagnostic tool that can be utilized in evaluation and \nmanagement of children with asthma symptoms and exacerbation.","PeriodicalId":58512,"journal":{"name":"呼吸病期刊(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"呼吸病期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrd.2021.114011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Sixty-four pediatric patients with asthma exacerbation were studied. The children were subjected to respiratory resistance evaluation using the Airflow Perturbation Device (APD) and spirometry evaluation. They were then administered albuterol and 15 minutes later the APD and spirometry evaluations were repeated. Eleven of the children could not perform spirometry. The APD results demonstrated that respiratory resistance of the patients decreased by about 20%, indicating that the APD could detect the expected response to bronchodilator. However, no similar conclusion could be made with the spirometry parameters (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25% - 75%) performed on the same patients. The differences on the spirometry parameters did not change significantly before and after bronchodilator administration. Furthermore, these differences were negligibly increased or decreased for some with no consistency between the FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25% - 75%. Even though all the children were clinically improved after albuterol administration and discharged home, this could not be demonstrated by spirometry data. This study validates previous reports that spirometry is not a reliable pulmonary diagnostic tool for young children, as spirometry is highly effort-dependent and requires a substantial degree of patient cooperation. APD on the other hand is a reliable, simple, effortless diagnostic tool that can be utilized in evaluation and management of children with asthma symptoms and exacerbation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用呼吸阻力值评估支气管扩张剂对哮喘发作儿童的反应
对64例哮喘发作的儿童患者进行了研究。使用气流扰动装置(APD)和肺活量测定法对儿童进行呼吸阻力评估。然后给他们服用沙丁胺醇,15分钟后重复APD和肺活量测定评估。其中11名儿童不能进行肺活量测定。APD结果表明,患者的呼吸阻力降低了约20%,表明APD可以检测到对支气管扩张剂的预期反应。然而,对相同患者进行的肺活量测定参数(FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC和FEF25%-75%)无法得出类似的结论。支气管扩张剂给药前后肺活量测定参数的差异没有显著变化。此外,对于FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC和FEF25%-75%之间没有一致性的一些患者,这些差异的增加或减少可以忽略不计。尽管所有儿童在服用沙丁胺醇后临床上都有所改善并出院回家,但肺活量测定数据无法证明这一点。这项研究证实了以前的报告,即肺活量测定不是幼儿可靠的肺部诊断工具,因为肺活量测量高度依赖于努力,需要大量的患者合作。另一方面,APD是一种可靠、简单、轻松的诊断工具,可用于评估和管理哮喘症状和恶化的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
期刊最新文献
Research Progress of Combined Detection of WBC, CRP and SAA in Early Diagnosis of Respiratory Tract Infection in Children Multi-Symptom Relief for Cough & Cold: Benefits of Adding Vicks VapoRub to the Treatment Regimen Immediate Respiratory Response to Electronic Cigarette Use Lung Function Impairment among Gasoline Attendants: A Cross-Sectional Study The Application of Indicators to Assess the Severity of Seasonal Influenza Epidemics in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015 to 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1