The impossible mind of sociology

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Digithum Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.7238/D.V0I24.3178
M. Hyvärinen
{"title":"The impossible mind of sociology","authors":"M. Hyvärinen","doi":"10.7238/D.V0I24.3178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mind has not been a central concept in sociology. According to the traditional view, the mind is located in the brain, and is thus bereft of observable social facts for sociological studies. At most, it is a concept of psychology or philosophy. This article argues that the history of the modern novel provides large amounts of data about minds and consciousness. Even though individual novels are fictional and invented, the continual reception of these fictional presentations verifies their social relevance. The article argues that fiction establishes the main social discourse on possible private thoughts, thus having a great impact on how we understand and speak about minds and human interiority. The argument is advanced by selectively reading a long-standing narratological debate on literary minds and their exceptionality. The article renounces the cognitive theories of ‘mind-reading’ as overly optimistic and metaphorically misleading, resorting instead to the phenomenological theories of ‘primary intersubjectivity’, which help in understanding how novelists are able to invent credible minds in the first place.","PeriodicalId":51964,"journal":{"name":"Digithum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digithum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7238/D.V0I24.3178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The mind has not been a central concept in sociology. According to the traditional view, the mind is located in the brain, and is thus bereft of observable social facts for sociological studies. At most, it is a concept of psychology or philosophy. This article argues that the history of the modern novel provides large amounts of data about minds and consciousness. Even though individual novels are fictional and invented, the continual reception of these fictional presentations verifies their social relevance. The article argues that fiction establishes the main social discourse on possible private thoughts, thus having a great impact on how we understand and speak about minds and human interiority. The argument is advanced by selectively reading a long-standing narratological debate on literary minds and their exceptionality. The article renounces the cognitive theories of ‘mind-reading’ as overly optimistic and metaphorically misleading, resorting instead to the phenomenological theories of ‘primary intersubjectivity’, which help in understanding how novelists are able to invent credible minds in the first place.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会学不可能的头脑
心智一直不是社会学的中心概念。根据传统观点,心智位于大脑中,因此社会学研究缺乏可观察的社会事实。最多,它是一个心理学或哲学的概念。本文认为,现代小说史提供了大量关于心灵和意识的资料。尽管个别小说是虚构的,但对这些虚构呈现的持续接受验证了它们的社会相关性。文章认为,小说建立了关于可能的私人思想的主要社会话语,从而对我们如何理解和谈论思想和人类的内在性产生了巨大影响。这一论点是通过选择性地阅读长期以来关于文学思想及其特殊性的叙事学辩论而提出的。文章摒弃了“读心”的认知理论,认为其过于乐观和隐喻误导,转而求助于“初级主体间性”的现象学理论,这有助于理解小说家如何首先创造出可信的头脑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digithum
Digithum HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Digithum applies a relational perspective in the analysis of processes of inclusion and social exclusion, subjective experiences, social ties, cultural heritage and cultural production and consumption.
期刊最新文献
De la precariedad económica a la vulnerabilidad existencial. Notas para una ampliación de paradigma The Third (included) in the interdependence between the human and the social The effects of work. A Simmelian view of delivery platforms Das Geistesleben unter die großstädte: the socio-affective order in the subway from a Simmelian perspective Simmelian Contributions to a Relational Sociology of Senses and Emotions: the Case of “Platforms of Delivery Workers”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1