Sovereign credit ratings and CDS spreads in Emerging Europe

Ł. Dopierała, Daria Ilczuk, Liwiusz Wojciechowski
{"title":"Sovereign credit ratings and CDS spreads in Emerging Europe","authors":"Ł. Dopierała, Daria Ilczuk, Liwiusz Wojciechowski","doi":"10.24136/eq.2020.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research background: Sovereign credit ratings play an important role in determining any country?s access to the international debt market. During the global financial crisis and the European debt crisis, credit rating agencies were harshly criticized for the timing of their announcements regarding ratings downgrades and the ranges of those downgrades. Therefore, it is worth considering whether the sovereign credit rating is still a useful benchmark for investors. \nPurpose of the article: This article examines whether credit rating agencies still provide financial markets with new information about the solvency of governments in Emerging Europe countries. In addition, it describes the differences in the effect of particular types of rating events on financial markets and the impact of individual agencies on the market situation. Our study also focuses on evaluating these occurrences at different stages of the business cycle. \nMethods: This article uses data about ratings events that took place between 2008 and 2018 in 17 Emerging Europe economies. We took into consideration positive, neutral, and negative events related to ratings changes and the outlooks reported by Fitch Ratings, Moody?s, and Standard & Poor?s. We used a methodology based on event studies. In addition, we performed Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and used a logit model to determine the usefulness of cumulative adjusted credit default swap (CDS) spread changes in predicting the direction of ratings changes. \nFindings & Value added: Our research provides evidence that the CDS market reflects information regarding government issuers up to three months before ratings downgrades are announced. Information reported to the market by ratings agencies is only relevant in the short timeframe surrounding ratings downgrades and upgrades. However, positive credit rating changes convey more information to the market. We also found strong evidence that, in the post-crisis period, credit ratings provide markets with less information.","PeriodicalId":45768,"journal":{"name":"Equilibrium-Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy","volume":"15 1","pages":"419-438"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equilibrium-Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research background: Sovereign credit ratings play an important role in determining any country?s access to the international debt market. During the global financial crisis and the European debt crisis, credit rating agencies were harshly criticized for the timing of their announcements regarding ratings downgrades and the ranges of those downgrades. Therefore, it is worth considering whether the sovereign credit rating is still a useful benchmark for investors. Purpose of the article: This article examines whether credit rating agencies still provide financial markets with new information about the solvency of governments in Emerging Europe countries. In addition, it describes the differences in the effect of particular types of rating events on financial markets and the impact of individual agencies on the market situation. Our study also focuses on evaluating these occurrences at different stages of the business cycle. Methods: This article uses data about ratings events that took place between 2008 and 2018 in 17 Emerging Europe economies. We took into consideration positive, neutral, and negative events related to ratings changes and the outlooks reported by Fitch Ratings, Moody?s, and Standard & Poor?s. We used a methodology based on event studies. In addition, we performed Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and used a logit model to determine the usefulness of cumulative adjusted credit default swap (CDS) spread changes in predicting the direction of ratings changes. Findings & Value added: Our research provides evidence that the CDS market reflects information regarding government issuers up to three months before ratings downgrades are announced. Information reported to the market by ratings agencies is only relevant in the short timeframe surrounding ratings downgrades and upgrades. However, positive credit rating changes convey more information to the market. We also found strong evidence that, in the post-crisis period, credit ratings provide markets with less information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新兴欧洲国家的主权信用评级和CDS价差
研究背景:主权信用评级在决定任何一个国家?美国进入国际债务市场的渠道。在全球金融危机和欧洲债务危机期间,信用评级机构因公布评级下调的时机和下调幅度而受到严厉批评。因此,对于投资者来说,主权信用评级是否仍然是一个有用的基准值得考虑。本文目的:本文考察了信用评级机构是否仍在为金融市场提供有关新兴欧洲国家政府偿债能力的新信息。此外,它还描述了特定类型的评级事件对金融市场的影响和个别机构对市场形势的影响的差异。我们的研究还侧重于评估在商业周期的不同阶段发生的这些事件。方法:本文使用了2008年至2018年在17个新兴欧洲经济体发生的评级事件的数据。我们考虑了与评级变化相关的正面、中性和负面事件,以及惠誉评级、穆迪?标准普尔(Standard & Poor?s)。我们使用了一种基于事件研究的方法。此外,我们进行了Wilcoxon符号秩检验,并使用logit模型来确定累积调整后的信用违约互换(CDS)价差变化在预测评级变化方向方面的有用性。研究结果与增值:我们的研究提供了证据,证明CDS市场反映了在评级下调宣布前三个月有关政府发行人的信息。评级机构向市场报告的信息仅在短期内与评级下调和上调有关。然而,积极的信用评级变化向市场传达了更多的信息。我们还发现强有力的证据表明,在后危机时期,信用评级为市场提供的信息较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.50%
发文量
28
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy is a scientific journal dedicated to economics, which is the result of close cooperation between the Instytut Badań Gospodarczych/Institute of Economic Research (Poland) and Polish Economic Society and leading European universities. The journal constitutes a platform for exchange of views of the scientific community, as well as reflects the current status and trends of world science and economy. The journal especially welcome empirical articles making use of quantitative methods in: Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics, International Economics, Financial Economics and Banking, Public Economics, Business Economics, Labor and Demographic Economics, Economic Development, and Technological Change, and Growth. Current most preferable topics and special issues: The economics of artificial intelligence: business potentials and risks; Digitalization and entrepreneurship in economics; Sustainable socio-economic development, environmental and ecological economics; Transition in the energy market (improving energy efficiency, alternative energy sources, renewable energy, energy security).
期刊最新文献
The impact of financial speculation on futures contracts price movements: A study of the US markets for dairy commodities E-customer preferences on sustainable last mile deliveries in the e-commerce market: A cross-generational perspective Global energy transition: From the main determinants to economic challenges regions IFRS innovation, governance practices and firm performance: A new empirical assessment of moderating effects across GCC region The impact of corporate reputation and social media engagement on the sustainability of SMEs: Perceptions of top managers and the owners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1