The relationship between disability and inclusion policy and sports coaches’ perceptions of practice

IF 2.1 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics Pub Date : 2022-05-20 DOI:10.1080/19406940.2022.2074515
Andrew M. Hammond
{"title":"The relationship between disability and inclusion policy and sports coaches’ perceptions of practice","authors":"Andrew M. Hammond","doi":"10.1080/19406940.2022.2074515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present study explored how disability-inclusive policies (e.g., the 7 Pillars of Inclusion and the Inclusive Swimming Framework) were enacted in practice by eight swimming coaches in Australia. The purpose of this study was to explore how these individual coaches experienced including disabled athletes within their practice and how they balanced elite- and mass-participation objectives. Coaches in this study worked in a variety of settings as either full-time employees of a swimming club, independent contractors, or employees of private schools that ran school and community swimming programmes. Theoretical concepts of policy enactment, drawn from policy sociology in education, guided the analysis of semi-structured interviews conducted with coaches. Participants reported coaching individuals competing at the state, national, and international level. Findings showed that coaches in this study ignored, adjusted, and re-worked official policies so they would fit with the contextual and cultural constraints of their organisations. Coaches were generally ambivalent towards people with disabilities; however, all were ‘willing and able’ to work with disabled athletes. Furthermore, findings indicated that the disconnect between coach development and inclusion policy development at Australian Swimming is effecting coaches, as these coaches did not see the promotion of inclusion as part of their coaching role. Therefore, it is posited that disability education should be included within broader coach education and development curriculum in line with broader governmental and Australian Swimming inclusion policy agendas aimed at improving participation of people with disabilities in sport. Implications for research, educators, and policy are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47174,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics","volume":"14 1","pages":"471 - 487"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2022.2074515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present study explored how disability-inclusive policies (e.g., the 7 Pillars of Inclusion and the Inclusive Swimming Framework) were enacted in practice by eight swimming coaches in Australia. The purpose of this study was to explore how these individual coaches experienced including disabled athletes within their practice and how they balanced elite- and mass-participation objectives. Coaches in this study worked in a variety of settings as either full-time employees of a swimming club, independent contractors, or employees of private schools that ran school and community swimming programmes. Theoretical concepts of policy enactment, drawn from policy sociology in education, guided the analysis of semi-structured interviews conducted with coaches. Participants reported coaching individuals competing at the state, national, and international level. Findings showed that coaches in this study ignored, adjusted, and re-worked official policies so they would fit with the contextual and cultural constraints of their organisations. Coaches were generally ambivalent towards people with disabilities; however, all were ‘willing and able’ to work with disabled athletes. Furthermore, findings indicated that the disconnect between coach development and inclusion policy development at Australian Swimming is effecting coaches, as these coaches did not see the promotion of inclusion as part of their coaching role. Therefore, it is posited that disability education should be included within broader coach education and development curriculum in line with broader governmental and Australian Swimming inclusion policy agendas aimed at improving participation of people with disabilities in sport. Implications for research, educators, and policy are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾与包容政策与体育教练实践观念的关系
摘要:本研究探讨了澳大利亚8位游泳教练在实践中如何制定残疾人包容政策(例如,包容的7大支柱和包容性游泳框架)。本研究的目的是探讨这些个人教练如何在他们的实践中经历包括残疾运动员,以及他们如何平衡精英和大众参与的目标。这项研究中的教练在各种环境中工作,要么是游泳俱乐部的全职员工,要么是独立承包商,要么是经营学校和社区游泳项目的私立学校的员工。政策制定的理论概念来自教育中的政策社会学,指导了对教练进行的半结构化访谈的分析。参与者报告了在州、国家和国际水平上竞争的教练个人。研究结果表明,本研究中的教练忽略、调整和重新制定官方政策,以适应其组织的背景和文化约束。教练对残疾人普遍持矛盾态度;然而,所有人都“愿意并且能够”帮助残疾运动员。此外,研究结果表明,澳大利亚游泳队教练发展与包容政策发展之间的脱节正在影响教练,因为这些教练没有将促进包容视为其教练角色的一部分。因此,残疾人教育应该被纳入更广泛的教练教育和发展课程中,以符合更广泛的政府和澳大利亚游泳包容政策议程,旨在提高残疾人参与体育运动。讨论了对研究、教育工作者和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Unlocking the power of sports: an exploration of the nexus between shared place, community competence, and sense of community Constraints and facilitators of elite athletes’ dual careers: a systematic literature review The arsenal of democracy? An examination of political regime types’ success in the global sporting arms race following the collapse of the iron curtain ‘Fog on the tyne’? The ‘common-sense’ focus on ‘sportswashing’ and the 2021 takeover of Newcastle United Power in mixed martial arts (MMA): a case study of the ultimate fighting championship (UFC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1