Going global: Comparing Chinese mobile applications’ data and user privacy governance at home and abroad

IF 3.6 Q1 COMMUNICATION Internet Policy Review Pub Date : 2020-09-16 DOI:10.14763/2020.3.1502
Lianrui Jia, Lotus Ruan
{"title":"Going global: Comparing Chinese mobile applications’ data and user privacy governance at home and abroad","authors":"Lianrui Jia, Lotus Ruan","doi":"10.14763/2020.3.1502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine and compare data and privacy governance by four China-based mobile applications and their international versions: Baidu, Toutiao and its international version TopBuzz, Douyin and its international version TikTok, and WeChat. Together, these four applications represent popular Chinese apps branching into diverse overseas markets such as Europe, Brazil, North America, and Southeast Asia. We first present an overview of the ownership, functions, business models and strategies of the reviewed apps. To study the app's interface design, we employ the walkthrough method to examine privacy features during the account registration and deletion stages in app usage. Lastly, we conducted content analysis of the terms of service and privacy policies to establish the app's data collection, storage, transfer, use, and disclosure measures. Our analysis showed variations across apps and within the Chinese and international-facing versions in their data and privacy governance in app design and policies. Baidu has the most unsatisfactory data and privacy protection measures, while ByteDance's TikTok/Douyin and TopBuzz/Toutiao offer more comprehensive user protection from different jurisdictions. Moreover, this paper highlights the role of platform owners (e.g., Google and Apple) in gatekeeping mobile app privacy standards and the role of the state in imposing a data protection framework on overseas versions of China-based mobile apps.","PeriodicalId":45799,"journal":{"name":"Internet Policy Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.3.1502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

We examine and compare data and privacy governance by four China-based mobile applications and their international versions: Baidu, Toutiao and its international version TopBuzz, Douyin and its international version TikTok, and WeChat. Together, these four applications represent popular Chinese apps branching into diverse overseas markets such as Europe, Brazil, North America, and Southeast Asia. We first present an overview of the ownership, functions, business models and strategies of the reviewed apps. To study the app's interface design, we employ the walkthrough method to examine privacy features during the account registration and deletion stages in app usage. Lastly, we conducted content analysis of the terms of service and privacy policies to establish the app's data collection, storage, transfer, use, and disclosure measures. Our analysis showed variations across apps and within the Chinese and international-facing versions in their data and privacy governance in app design and policies. Baidu has the most unsatisfactory data and privacy protection measures, while ByteDance's TikTok/Douyin and TopBuzz/Toutiao offer more comprehensive user protection from different jurisdictions. Moreover, this paper highlights the role of platform owners (e.g., Google and Apple) in gatekeeping mobile app privacy standards and the role of the state in imposing a data protection framework on overseas versions of China-based mobile apps.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向全球:比较国内外中国移动应用的数据和用户隐私治理
我们通过四个基于中国的移动应用程序及其国际版本来研究和比较数据和隐私治理:百度、今日头条及其国际版本TopBuzz、抖音及其国际版本TikTok和微信。总之,这四个应用程序代表了流行的中国应用程序扩展到不同的海外市场,如欧洲、巴西、北美和东南亚。我们首先概述了被审查应用程序的所有权、功能、商业模式和策略。为了研究应用程序的界面设计,我们采用了演练的方法来检查应用程序使用过程中账户注册和删除阶段的隐私特征。最后,我们对服务条款和隐私政策进行内容分析,建立应用数据的收集、存储、传输、使用和披露措施。我们的分析显示,在应用程序设计和政策中的数据和隐私治理方面,不同应用程序之间以及中国和国际版本之间存在差异。百度的数据和隐私保护措施最不令人满意,而字节跳动的抖音/抖音和TopBuzz/今日头条在不同的司法管辖区提供了更全面的用户保护。此外,本文强调了平台所有者(例如b谷歌和苹果)在把关移动应用隐私标准方面的作用,以及国家在对中国移动应用海外版本实施数据保护框架方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
30
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Government responses to online disinformation unpacked Navigating the AI frontier: European parliamentary insights on bias and regulation, preceding the AI Act Regulatory capacity capture: the United Kingdom’s online safety regime A complicated picture: Media diversity in the case of Google’s video search during the pandemic Dis/Trust and data-driven technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1