Rural Development Policy in Germany Regarding Coworking Spaces and Effects on Vitality and Versatility of Rural Towns

IF 2.1 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Urban science (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI:10.3390/urbansci7030086
M. Hölzel, W. D. de Vries
{"title":"Rural Development Policy in Germany Regarding Coworking Spaces and Effects on Vitality and Versatility of Rural Towns","authors":"M. Hölzel, W. D. de Vries","doi":"10.3390/urbansci7030086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote rural areas have been declining in population for decades, partly permanently as people move away and partly temporarily, owing to commuting. This increasing paucity of inhabitants is causing these places to lose vitality and versatility; this, in turn, renders them less attractive overall. In terms of spatial development, policies devised for rural areas have long been concerned not only with agriculture, but also with holistic development. For some years now, ICT has work become increasingly location-independent. This is often seen as an opportunity for rural development. In addition to the general facilitation of remote working, i.e., working from home, coworking spaces make it possible to separate out our private and professional lives. The aim of this research is to find out to what extent public authorities position themselves on this topic and express their views on coworking spaces. Policies in this area have been promulgated by various federal ministries (Bundesebene) and federal states (Länderebene). Thus, we have collected relevant policies from the websites of federal ministries and three federal states (Bavaria, Schleswig-Holstein, Saxony-Anhalt), examined them for their keywords, and read and analyzed the documents that were found. Further, we have interviewed the founders and operators of particular coworking spaces. At the federal level, it is noteworthy that the ministry responsible for rural areas has published the greatest number of policies in which coworking spaces are mentioned. At the state level (Landesebene), the picture is more diverse, between the various state governments and the respective states. However, the contribution of coworking spaces to the vitality and versatility of rural towns is mentioned only rarely, and the importance of location is seldom pointed out. Comparing the results of this study with previous research in the literature, it can be concluded that public authorities should pay more attention to the opportunities and risks of coworking spaces in rural areas. Based on this, clearer objectives for coworking spaces in these areas can be formulated. When subsidies are disbursed, they should be accompanied by a mandatory evaluation to check what the subsidies have achieved and whether the subsidies have been used in a targeted manner. In addition, a larger database could be created for further research.","PeriodicalId":75284,"journal":{"name":"Urban science (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban science (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7030086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Remote rural areas have been declining in population for decades, partly permanently as people move away and partly temporarily, owing to commuting. This increasing paucity of inhabitants is causing these places to lose vitality and versatility; this, in turn, renders them less attractive overall. In terms of spatial development, policies devised for rural areas have long been concerned not only with agriculture, but also with holistic development. For some years now, ICT has work become increasingly location-independent. This is often seen as an opportunity for rural development. In addition to the general facilitation of remote working, i.e., working from home, coworking spaces make it possible to separate out our private and professional lives. The aim of this research is to find out to what extent public authorities position themselves on this topic and express their views on coworking spaces. Policies in this area have been promulgated by various federal ministries (Bundesebene) and federal states (Länderebene). Thus, we have collected relevant policies from the websites of federal ministries and three federal states (Bavaria, Schleswig-Holstein, Saxony-Anhalt), examined them for their keywords, and read and analyzed the documents that were found. Further, we have interviewed the founders and operators of particular coworking spaces. At the federal level, it is noteworthy that the ministry responsible for rural areas has published the greatest number of policies in which coworking spaces are mentioned. At the state level (Landesebene), the picture is more diverse, between the various state governments and the respective states. However, the contribution of coworking spaces to the vitality and versatility of rural towns is mentioned only rarely, and the importance of location is seldom pointed out. Comparing the results of this study with previous research in the literature, it can be concluded that public authorities should pay more attention to the opportunities and risks of coworking spaces in rural areas. Based on this, clearer objectives for coworking spaces in these areas can be formulated. When subsidies are disbursed, they should be accompanied by a mandatory evaluation to check what the subsidies have achieved and whether the subsidies have been used in a targeted manner. In addition, a larger database could be created for further research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国关于共享办公空间的乡村发展政策及其对乡村城镇活力和多样性的影响
几十年来,偏远农村地区的人口一直在减少,一部分是由于人们搬走而造成的永久性减少,另一部分是由于通勤造成的暂时性减少。居民的日益稀少导致这些地方失去了活力和多样性;这反过来又降低了它们的整体吸引力。在空间发展方面,为农村地区制定的政策长期以来不仅关注农业,而且关注整体发展。几年来,信息通信技术的工作越来越与地点无关。这通常被视为农村发展的机会。除了为远程工作(即在家工作)提供便利外,共享办公空间还可以将我们的私人生活和职业生活分开。本研究的目的是找出公共当局在多大程度上对这一主题进行定位,并表达他们对联合办公空间的看法。各联邦部委和联邦州(Länderebene)都颁布了这方面的政策。因此,我们从联邦部委和三个联邦州(巴伐利亚州、石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州、萨克森-安哈尔特州)的网站上收集了相关政策,对其关键词进行了检查,并对找到的文件进行了阅读和分析。此外,我们还采访了特定联合办公空间的创始人和经营者。在联邦一级,值得注意的是,负责农村地区的部门发布了最多的政策,其中提到了联合办公空间。在州一级(Landesebene),在各州政府和各自的州之间,情况更加多样化。然而,联合办公空间对乡村小镇的活力和多样性的贡献却很少被提及,而位置的重要性也很少被指出。将本研究的结果与之前的文献研究结果进行比较,可以得出结论,公共当局应该更加关注农村地区联合办公空间的机会和风险。在此基础上,可以为这些区域的联合办公空间制定更清晰的目标。在发放补贴时,应附有强制性评估,以检查补贴取得了什么成效,补贴是否被有针对性地使用。此外,可以建立一个更大的数据库以供进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mapping Deprived Urban Areas Using Open Geospatial Data and Machine Learning in Africa Developing a Qualitative Urban Green Spaces Index Applied to a Mediterranean City Strengthening Resilient Built Environments through Human Social Capital: A Path to Post-COVID-19 Recovery The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Public Transportation System of Montevideo, Uruguay: A Urban Data Analysis Approach Sociodemographic Analysis of Disability in a Highly Depopulated Rural Region: The Case of Soria, Spain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1