Tragic Workings in Sophocles’ Ajax: The Institution of the Warrior

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS Symbolae Osloenses Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.1080/00397679.2022.2145046
Synnøve Des Bouvrie
{"title":"Tragic Workings in Sophocles’ Ajax: The Institution of the Warrior","authors":"Synnøve Des Bouvrie","doi":"10.1080/00397679.2022.2145046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sophocles’ Ajax has been subject to intense scholarly debate. While widely admired, the tragedy has frustrated critics who have found its composition and character portrayal problematic. It is argued that this may be due to the limitations of the methods current in the “Humanities' Paradigm”. Instead, an approach based on the “Anthropological Paradigm” is proposed, viewing the drama within its social context of a communal celebration. The properties of these social events may give us a clue to understanding the nature of the genre. Instead of judging the protagonists as individuals, we should notice their status as a symbol, conveying an institutional value in society. Relying on Aristotle’s definition of tragedy, and his emphasis on the tragic reactions of “shock and horror” roused in the ancient audience, we may identify the “tragic workings” as the violation of a socially unquestionable value, in our drama the violation of the “Warrior institution”, which may give a more satisfying answer to the problems identified in Sophocles’ Ajax.","PeriodicalId":41733,"journal":{"name":"Symbolae Osloenses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symbolae Osloenses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00397679.2022.2145046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sophocles’ Ajax has been subject to intense scholarly debate. While widely admired, the tragedy has frustrated critics who have found its composition and character portrayal problematic. It is argued that this may be due to the limitations of the methods current in the “Humanities' Paradigm”. Instead, an approach based on the “Anthropological Paradigm” is proposed, viewing the drama within its social context of a communal celebration. The properties of these social events may give us a clue to understanding the nature of the genre. Instead of judging the protagonists as individuals, we should notice their status as a symbol, conveying an institutional value in society. Relying on Aristotle’s definition of tragedy, and his emphasis on the tragic reactions of “shock and horror” roused in the ancient audience, we may identify the “tragic workings” as the violation of a socially unquestionable value, in our drama the violation of the “Warrior institution”, which may give a more satisfying answer to the problems identified in Sophocles’ Ajax.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
索福克勒斯《阿贾克斯》中的悲剧作品:勇士制度
索福克勒斯的Ajax一直受到激烈的学术争论。虽然这部悲剧广受好评,但令评论家们感到沮丧,他们发现它的构图和人物刻画有问题。有人认为,这可能是由于“人文范式”中现有方法的局限性。相反,提出了一种基于“人类学范式”的方法,在公共庆典的社会背景下观看戏剧。这些社会事件的性质可能会给我们理解这一类型的本质提供线索。我们不应该将主角视为个人,而应该注意他们作为象征的地位,传达社会中的制度价值。根据亚里士多德对悲剧的定义,以及他对古代观众“震惊和恐怖”的悲剧反应的强调,我们可以将“悲剧运作”认定为对社会毋庸置疑的价值的侵犯,在我们的戏剧中,认定为对“战士制度”的侵犯,这可能会对索福克勒斯的《阿贾克斯》中发现的问题给出更令人满意的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Symbolae Osloenses
Symbolae Osloenses CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
“What a Fine Thing It Is to Be Able to Say to Oneself … ”: Reflexivity and Verbal Contexts in the Stoic Epictetus Departments of Greek and Latin Studies in Norwegian Universities Contributors’ Addresses Editorial Note Critical Notes on Pseudo-Sisbert’s Exhortatio Poenitendi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1