A Comparison of the Semi Analytical and Numerical Method in Solving the Problem of Magnetohydrodynamics Flow of a Third Grade Fluid between Two Parallel Plates

IF 0.3 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science Pub Date : 2022-12-26 DOI:10.4314/mejs.v14i2.4
Lawal O. W, Erinle-Ibrahim L. M, Okunoye O. S
{"title":"A Comparison of the Semi Analytical and Numerical Method in Solving the Problem of Magnetohydrodynamics Flow of a Third Grade Fluid between Two Parallel Plates","authors":"Lawal O. W, Erinle-Ibrahim L. M, Okunoye O. S","doi":"10.4314/mejs.v14i2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this study is to compare a semi-analytical method and numerical method namely the homotopy perturbation method (HPM) and finite difference method (FDM) respectively. These methods were employed for solving the nonlinear problem of the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) couette flow of third-grade fluid between the two parallel plates. The comparison was made between a solution of HPM and FDM against a solution obtained from regular perturbation and the results are tabulated. From a computational viewpoint, it is revealed that the HPM is more reliable and efficient than FDM. Also, the results show that the FDM requires slightly more computational effort than the HPM, although the HPM yields more accurate results than the FDM. \n ","PeriodicalId":18948,"journal":{"name":"Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/mejs.v14i2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to compare a semi-analytical method and numerical method namely the homotopy perturbation method (HPM) and finite difference method (FDM) respectively. These methods were employed for solving the nonlinear problem of the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) couette flow of third-grade fluid between the two parallel plates. The comparison was made between a solution of HPM and FDM against a solution obtained from regular perturbation and the results are tabulated. From a computational viewpoint, it is revealed that the HPM is more reliable and efficient than FDM. Also, the results show that the FDM requires slightly more computational effort than the HPM, although the HPM yields more accurate results than the FDM.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求解两平行板间三级流体磁流体力学流动问题的半解析法与数值法的比较
本研究的主要目的是比较半解析方法和数值方法,即同伦摄动法(HPM)和有限差分法(FDM)。这些方法用于求解两平行板间三级流体的磁流体动力学(MHD)库埃特流动的非线性问题。将HPM和FDM的解与常规扰动的解进行了比较,并将结果制成表格。从计算的角度来看,HPM比FDM更可靠和有效。此外,结果表明,FDM比HPM需要更多的计算量,尽管HPM比FDM产生更准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science
Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
First occurrence of rudderfish Centrolophus niger (Gmelin, 1789) in the Edremit Bay (Northern Aegean Sea, Türkiye) with the maximum length record for Turkish Seas An Engineering Geological Appraisal of the Leakage Problem in Dora-1 Earthen Dam, Tigray: Implications for its Stability Nano-Zirconia Synthesis Methods and their Pioneering Applications in Dentistry Contribution of Participatory Forest Management Program in Non-Timber Forest Products to balance Livelihood Improvement and Conservation: a case of Sera Forest, Amigna District, Southern Ethiopia Effect of Polymerization Variables on the Electrical Conductivity of Polyaniline Functionalized Cotton Textiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1