A Forgotten First: Everett J. Waring, First Black Supreme Court Advocate, and the Case of Jones v. United States

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Journal of Supreme Court History Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1111/jsch.12306
John G. Browning
{"title":"A Forgotten First: Everett J. Waring, First Black Supreme Court Advocate, and the Case of Jones v. United States","authors":"John G. Browning","doi":"10.1111/jsch.12306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In reflecting upon her historic confirma­ tion as the first Black woman on the nation’s highest court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson acknowledged that she stood “on the shoul­ ders” of many “true pathbreakers.”1 While Justice Jackson undoubtedly had in mind Black Supreme Court advocates turned mem­ bers of the federal judiciary like Constance Baker Motley (first Black female federal judge) and Thurgood Marshall, one cannot ignore the rich legacy left by nineteenth cen­ tury Black lawyers who appeared before the Court. While the history of lawyers generally has been too long regarded as “a White man’s history”2 and Black lawyers’ “names and contributions remained unknown,”3 the history of Black Supreme Court advocates has been particularly neglected.4 Occasional mentions are made of pioneers like John Swett Rock (who in 1865 became the first Black lawyer admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court) or Emmanuel M. Hewlett and Cornelius J. Jones (early Black Supreme Court advocates who on December 13, 1895, argued Gibson v. Mississippi and Smith v. Mississippi, respectively). But for too long, the question of “who was the first Black lawyer to ague before the United States Supreme Court?” has gone unanswered—or worse, incorrectly answered.5 This article seeks to rectify historical oversight and give due credit to this forgotten first: Everett J. Waring of Maryland, who in 1890 argued the case of Jones v. United States. The case he brought transcended garden variety criminal defense and the mis­ treatment of Black workers to raise important questions about sovereignty and jurisdiction in the early days of U.S. imperialism that still resonate today. But in order to appreciate Waring’s achievement, and place it in histor­ ical perspective, we must first examine the complicated circumstances that launched his","PeriodicalId":41873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supreme Court History","volume":"47 3","pages":"265-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supreme Court History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsch.12306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In reflecting upon her historic confirma­ tion as the first Black woman on the nation’s highest court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson acknowledged that she stood “on the shoul­ ders” of many “true pathbreakers.”1 While Justice Jackson undoubtedly had in mind Black Supreme Court advocates turned mem­ bers of the federal judiciary like Constance Baker Motley (first Black female federal judge) and Thurgood Marshall, one cannot ignore the rich legacy left by nineteenth cen­ tury Black lawyers who appeared before the Court. While the history of lawyers generally has been too long regarded as “a White man’s history”2 and Black lawyers’ “names and contributions remained unknown,”3 the history of Black Supreme Court advocates has been particularly neglected.4 Occasional mentions are made of pioneers like John Swett Rock (who in 1865 became the first Black lawyer admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court) or Emmanuel M. Hewlett and Cornelius J. Jones (early Black Supreme Court advocates who on December 13, 1895, argued Gibson v. Mississippi and Smith v. Mississippi, respectively). But for too long, the question of “who was the first Black lawyer to ague before the United States Supreme Court?” has gone unanswered—or worse, incorrectly answered.5 This article seeks to rectify historical oversight and give due credit to this forgotten first: Everett J. Waring of Maryland, who in 1890 argued the case of Jones v. United States. The case he brought transcended garden variety criminal defense and the mis­ treatment of Black workers to raise important questions about sovereignty and jurisdiction in the early days of U.S. imperialism that still resonate today. But in order to appreciate Waring’s achievement, and place it in histor­ ical perspective, we must first examine the complicated circumstances that launched his

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被遗忘的第一次:埃弗雷特·j·韦林,第一位黑人最高法院辩护律师,以及琼斯诉美国案
大法官凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊(Ketanji Brown Jackson)在回顾她作为美国最高法院首位黑人女性的历史性身份时承认,她站在许多“真正的开拓者”的“肩膀上”。“1毫无疑问,杰克逊大法官考虑到了最高法院的黑人支持者,如康斯坦斯·贝克·莫特利(第一位黑人女联邦法官)和瑟古德·马歇尔,他们后来成为了联邦司法机构的成员,但人们不能忽视出庭的十九世纪黑人律师留下的丰富遗产。虽然律师的历史通常被认为是“白人的历史”2,黑人律师的“名字和贡献仍然未知”3,但黑人最高法院辩护人的历史尤其被忽视。4偶尔会提到约翰·斯威特·洛克等先驱(1865年,他成为第一位在美国最高法院执业的黑人律师)或Emmanuel M.Hewlett和Cornelius J.Jones(1895年12月13日,早期黑人最高法院辩护人,分别为Gibson诉密西西比和Smith诉密西西比辩护)。但很长一段时间以来,“谁是第一位在美国最高法院出庭的黑人律师?”这个问题一直没有得到回答,或者更糟的是,回答错误。5这篇文章试图纠正历史上的疏忽,并对这个被遗忘的第一人给予应有的赞扬:马里兰州的埃弗雷特·J·沃林,他在1890年为琼斯诉美国案辩护。他提起的案件超越了普通的刑事辩护和对黑人工人的不当待遇,提出了美帝国主义早期关于主权和管辖权的重要问题,这些问题至今仍能引起共鸣。但为了欣赏沃林的成就,并将其放在历史的角度来看,我们必须首先审视引发他创作的复杂环境
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
The Bronze Doors, or A Tribute to the Legitimacy and Endurance of the Written Rule of Law Livingston v. Jefferson and Jefferson v. Marshall—Defending an Ex-President Samuel Nelson and Judicial Reputation William Howard Taft as Solicitor General Senator Charles Sumner and the Admission of John S. Rock to the Supreme Court Barn
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1