The mutagenicity of organic extracts in source water and peripheral water with different disinfection ways

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Applied Environmental Biotechnology Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI:10.26789/AEB.2019.01.008
Y. Zhong, Xiaotong Li, Qiying Huang, Rende Huang, Zi-Yan Zhou, Hua Bi, P. Feng, Dedong Wang
{"title":"The mutagenicity of organic extracts in source water and peripheral water with different disinfection ways","authors":"Y. Zhong, Xiaotong Li, Qiying Huang, Rende Huang, Zi-Yan Zhou, Hua Bi, P. Feng, Dedong Wang","doi":"10.26789/AEB.2019.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine mutagen contamination, to compare the differences between inlet and outlet distribution, and the possible impacts on public health. Water samples were collected from four different waterworks in Guangzhou, China. The Ames test was conducted to investigate the potential mutagenicity caused by organic extracts from drinking water sources and peripheral water. Organic content was extracted with XAD-2 resin column and organic solvents, and toxicity was tested in three doses of extract equivalent, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 L source water. The results of the Ames test showed that all the organic extracts from water samples could induce different levels of mutagenic potentials in the absence of S9 mix, which indicated mutagenicity and strain. Comparing with TA98, TA100 was more sensitive in genotoxicity. Mutagenic enhancement factors were found in both drinking water sources and peripheral water. Water treatment technologies with different disinfection ways could increase the mutagenicity of water, but the biological significance of mutagenicity of the organic extracts remained to be further confirmed. The results suggested that it was necessary to concern the relationship between source water, water treatment unit and the mutagenicity factors of water.","PeriodicalId":36987,"journal":{"name":"Applied Environmental Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Environmental Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26789/AEB.2019.01.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine mutagen contamination, to compare the differences between inlet and outlet distribution, and the possible impacts on public health. Water samples were collected from four different waterworks in Guangzhou, China. The Ames test was conducted to investigate the potential mutagenicity caused by organic extracts from drinking water sources and peripheral water. Organic content was extracted with XAD-2 resin column and organic solvents, and toxicity was tested in three doses of extract equivalent, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 L source water. The results of the Ames test showed that all the organic extracts from water samples could induce different levels of mutagenic potentials in the absence of S9 mix, which indicated mutagenicity and strain. Comparing with TA98, TA100 was more sensitive in genotoxicity. Mutagenic enhancement factors were found in both drinking water sources and peripheral water. Water treatment technologies with different disinfection ways could increase the mutagenicity of water, but the biological significance of mutagenicity of the organic extracts remained to be further confirmed. The results suggested that it was necessary to concern the relationship between source water, water treatment unit and the mutagenicity factors of water.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同消毒方式的水源水和周边水中有机提取物的诱变性
本研究旨在确定诱变剂污染,比较入口和出口分布之间的差异,以及对公众健康的可能影响。从中国广州的四个不同的自来水厂采集了水样。Ames试验是为了研究饮用水源和周边水的有机提取物引起的潜在致突变性。用XAD-2树脂柱和有机溶剂提取有机物含量,并在0.2、0.4和0.8L三种剂量的提取物当量的源水中测试毒性。Ames试验结果表明,在没有S9混合物的情况下,所有水样的有机提取物都能诱导不同水平的诱变潜力,这表明了其诱变性和菌株。与TA98相比,TA100对基因毒性更敏感。在饮用水源和周边水源中都发现了致突变增强因子。不同消毒方式的水处理技术会增加水的致突变性,但有机提取物致突变性的生物学意义还有待进一步证实。结果表明,有必要关注水源水、水处理装置与水致突变性因素之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Environmental Biotechnology
Applied Environmental Biotechnology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
The effect of Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) as a microbial diatory feed supplement for juvenile of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Micro- and nano-plastics in hydroponic environment are critical for plants: A meta-analysis Popularization or Population of Science and the Future Recycling of biogas wastewater to organic fertilizers and influence of organic fertilizers on maize, mung bean growth and yield under the field conditions A Comparative Study of Antibacterial Activity of Citrus and Jabali Honeys with Manuka Honey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1