SARC-F questionnaire identifies physical limitations and predicts post discharge outcomes in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease

Shinya Tanaka, Kentaro Kamiya, Nobuaki Hamazaki, Ryota Matsuzawa, Kohei Nozaki, Yuta Ichinosawa, Manae Harada, Takeshi Nakamura, Emi Maekawa, Chiharu Noda, Minako Yamaoka-Tojo, Atsuhiko Matsunaga, Takashi Masuda, Junya Ako
{"title":"SARC-F questionnaire identifies physical limitations and predicts post discharge outcomes in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease","authors":"Shinya Tanaka,&nbsp;Kentaro Kamiya,&nbsp;Nobuaki Hamazaki,&nbsp;Ryota Matsuzawa,&nbsp;Kohei Nozaki,&nbsp;Yuta Ichinosawa,&nbsp;Manae Harada,&nbsp;Takeshi Nakamura,&nbsp;Emi Maekawa,&nbsp;Chiharu Noda,&nbsp;Minako Yamaoka-Tojo,&nbsp;Atsuhiko Matsunaga,&nbsp;Takashi Masuda,&nbsp;Junya Ako","doi":"10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A simple and inexpensive sarcopenia screening tool would be beneficial in clinical practice. This study was performed to determine whether SARC-F questionnaire can be used to identify physical limitations and poor prognosis in elderly cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>The study population consisted of 257 Japanese patients ≥65 years old admitted to our hospital for CVD. Prior to discharge from hospital, SARC-F, handgrip strength, usual gait speed, short physical performance battery score, and 6-minute walking distance were measured in all patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to SARC-F score: SARC-F &lt;4 and SARC-F ≥4. The study endpoint was the first occurrence of all-cause emergency readmission or all-cause mortality. The prevalence rate of SARC-F ≥4 was 26.8%, and increased with age and number of comorbidities. Even after adjusting for covariates, physical function was significantly poorer and the risks of physical function measurements below the critical cut-off values were higher in the SARC-F ≥4 group compared to the SARC-F &lt;4 group. Sixty (23.3%) patients were readmitted and 17 (6.6%) died over a median follow-up period of 11 months (interquartile range: 6–13 months). SARC-F score was a significant predictor of adverse events after discharge. Patients with SARC-F ≥4 showed higher event risk than those with SARC-F &lt;4 (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–3.07; P = 0.040).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SARC-F questionnaire is useful to identify patients at high risk of physical limitations and to predict post-discharge outcomes in elderly CVD patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73543,"journal":{"name":"JCSM clinical reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM clinical reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background

A simple and inexpensive sarcopenia screening tool would be beneficial in clinical practice. This study was performed to determine whether SARC-F questionnaire can be used to identify physical limitations and poor prognosis in elderly cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.

Methods and results

The study population consisted of 257 Japanese patients ≥65 years old admitted to our hospital for CVD. Prior to discharge from hospital, SARC-F, handgrip strength, usual gait speed, short physical performance battery score, and 6-minute walking distance were measured in all patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to SARC-F score: SARC-F <4 and SARC-F ≥4. The study endpoint was the first occurrence of all-cause emergency readmission or all-cause mortality. The prevalence rate of SARC-F ≥4 was 26.8%, and increased with age and number of comorbidities. Even after adjusting for covariates, physical function was significantly poorer and the risks of physical function measurements below the critical cut-off values were higher in the SARC-F ≥4 group compared to the SARC-F <4 group. Sixty (23.3%) patients were readmitted and 17 (6.6%) died over a median follow-up period of 11 months (interquartile range: 6–13 months). SARC-F score was a significant predictor of adverse events after discharge. Patients with SARC-F ≥4 showed higher event risk than those with SARC-F <4 (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–3.07; P = 0.040).

Conclusions

SARC-F questionnaire is useful to identify patients at high risk of physical limitations and to predict post-discharge outcomes in elderly CVD patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARC-F问卷确定老年心血管疾病患者的身体限制并预测出院后的预后
背景一种简单、廉价的肌少症筛查工具将有助于临床实践。本研究旨在确定SARC-F问卷是否可以用于识别老年心血管疾病(CVD)患者的身体限制和不良预后。方法和结果研究人群包括257例年龄≥65岁的日本CVD患者。出院前,测量所有患者的SARC-F、握力、通常步态速度、短时体能电池评分和6分钟步行距离。根据SARC-F评分将患者分为SARC-F <4和SARC-F≥4两组。研究终点为首次发生的全因紧急再入院或全因死亡。SARC-F≥4的患病率为26.8%,随年龄和合并症数量的增加而增加。即使在调整协变量后,与SARC-F <4组相比,SARC-F≥4组的身体功能明显较差,身体功能测量低于临界临界值的风险更高。60例(23.3%)患者再次入院,17例(6.6%)患者死亡,中位随访时间为11个月(四分位数范围:6-13个月)。SARC-F评分是出院后不良事件的显著预测因子。SARC-F≥4的患者发生事件的风险高于SARC-F≥4的患者(校正风险比:1.78;95%置信区间:1.03-3.07;P = 0.040)。结论SARC-F问卷有助于识别老年CVD患者身体受限的高危患者,并预测其出院后的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Predictive influence of artificial intelligence-based body composition analysis in trauma patients with pelvic injuries Issue Information A review of radiological definitions of sarcopenia in cancer The impact of low muscle mass on prognosis following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1