Ansvarlig forskningspraksis, forskningsfrihed og uvildighed

Heine Andersen
{"title":"Ansvarlig forskningspraksis, forskningsfrihed og uvildighed","authors":"Heine Andersen","doi":"10.7146/tfp.v17i33.129160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scope of rules on scientific ethics, responsible research practice, etc. has grown steadily over recent decades. These are mostly about what researchers should not and what they should do. In this article, I will look at the principles from a different perspective: Freedom of research is part of good scientific practice. Violating research freedom is detrimental to research. First, I outline very briefly what is meant by professions. Next follows an account of what is generally understood by research freedom. The thesis is that responsible research practice holds a tension between restrictions and freedom.","PeriodicalId":32373,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/tfp.v17i33.129160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scope of rules on scientific ethics, responsible research practice, etc. has grown steadily over recent decades. These are mostly about what researchers should not and what they should do. In this article, I will look at the principles from a different perspective: Freedom of research is part of good scientific practice. Violating research freedom is detrimental to research. First, I outline very briefly what is meant by professions. Next follows an account of what is generally understood by research freedom. The thesis is that responsible research practice holds a tension between restrictions and freedom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
负责任的研究实践、研究自由和公正
近几十年来,科学伦理、负责任的研究实践等规则的范围稳步扩大。这些主要是关于研究人员不应该做什么和应该做什么。在这篇文章中,我将从不同的角度来看待这些原则:研究自由是良好科学实践的一部分。侵犯研究自由对研究是有害的。首先,我非常简要地概述了什么是专业。接下来是对研究自由的一般理解。论文认为,负责任的研究实践在限制和自由之间存在着张力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lege- og børnekulturer i praksis Professionsidentitet blandt ergoterapeutstuderende Janne Østergaard Hagelquist: Mentalisering i mødet med udsatte børn Sanne Faber, Andreas Kopp og Kirsten Lauta: Det meningsfulde historiefag Frivilliges samarbejde med medarbejdere i kirken - med hvilket engagement?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1