Need for Cognition in a Portuguese Managers Sample: Invariance Across Gender and Professional Activity

IF 0.6 Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Psychologist-Manager Journal Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.1037/mgr0000077
C. Sousa, Hugo Palácios, C. Gonçalves, Joaquim Santana Fernandes, G. Gonçalves
{"title":"Need for Cognition in a Portuguese Managers Sample: Invariance Across Gender and Professional Activity","authors":"C. Sousa, Hugo Palácios, C. Gonçalves, Joaquim Santana Fernandes, G. Gonçalves","doi":"10.1037/mgr0000077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current organizational environment, characterized by uncertainty, requires the need for comprehending a complex set of variables and relations. Understanding, decision-making, and judging of information are daily processes that managers perform; these processes are often influenced by individual characteristics in terms of information processing. Among the several determining attributes of managers’ performance presented in the literature is the need for cognition. Despite its importance, studies with samples of Portuguese managers are still scarce, so that through a sample of 442 managers who are members of the executive body of Portuguese microenterprises, this study examined (a) the factor structure of the Need for Cognition Scale–18 items (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982), (b) the scale’s reliability, and (c) the invariance of its factor structure across gender and across professional activity (through a sample of nonmanagers, n = 344). Our analyses support a structure with three factors (Commitment of Cognitive Effort, Preference for Complexity, and Desire for Understanding), with good reliability and validity. The Scale showed variance between genders and between samples, which makes it less generalizable and more susceptible to population type. We also found significant differences in the levels of need for cognition between genders, in the factors Commitment of Cognitive Effort and Preference for Complexity. The sample of managers had significantly higher levels of need for cognition compared with the sample of nonmanagers. Collectively, these findings provide compelling evidence in support of the Need for Cognition Scale for managers and other professionals. However, more research is warranted to investigate the scale measurement invariance.","PeriodicalId":44734,"journal":{"name":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The current organizational environment, characterized by uncertainty, requires the need for comprehending a complex set of variables and relations. Understanding, decision-making, and judging of information are daily processes that managers perform; these processes are often influenced by individual characteristics in terms of information processing. Among the several determining attributes of managers’ performance presented in the literature is the need for cognition. Despite its importance, studies with samples of Portuguese managers are still scarce, so that through a sample of 442 managers who are members of the executive body of Portuguese microenterprises, this study examined (a) the factor structure of the Need for Cognition Scale–18 items (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982), (b) the scale’s reliability, and (c) the invariance of its factor structure across gender and across professional activity (through a sample of nonmanagers, n = 344). Our analyses support a structure with three factors (Commitment of Cognitive Effort, Preference for Complexity, and Desire for Understanding), with good reliability and validity. The Scale showed variance between genders and between samples, which makes it less generalizable and more susceptible to population type. We also found significant differences in the levels of need for cognition between genders, in the factors Commitment of Cognitive Effort and Preference for Complexity. The sample of managers had significantly higher levels of need for cognition compared with the sample of nonmanagers. Collectively, these findings provide compelling evidence in support of the Need for Cognition Scale for managers and other professionals. However, more research is warranted to investigate the scale measurement invariance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙经理人样本的认知需求:跨性别与专业活动的不变性
当前的组织环境以不确定性为特征,需要理解一套复杂的变量和关系。对信息的理解、决策和判断是管理者的日常工作;这些过程通常受到信息处理方面的个体特征的影响。在文献中提出的经理人绩效的几个决定属性中,认知需求是其中之一。尽管它很重要,但对葡萄牙管理者样本的研究仍然很少,因此,本研究通过442名葡萄牙微型企业执行机构成员的管理者样本,检验了(a)认知需求量表- 18项目的因素结构(Cacioppo & Petty, 1982), (b)量表的可靠性,(c)其因素结构在性别和职业活动中的不变性(通过非管理者样本,n = 344)。我们的分析支持一个包含三个因素(认知努力承诺、复杂性偏好和理解欲望)的结构,具有良好的信度和效度。该量表显示了性别之间和样本之间的差异,这使得它不那么普遍,更容易受到人口类型的影响。我们还发现,在认知努力承诺和复杂性偏好这两个因素中,性别之间的认知需求水平存在显著差异。管理者样本的认知需求水平显著高于非管理者样本。总的来说,这些发现为支持管理人员和其他专业人员的认知需求量表提供了令人信服的证据。然而,尺度测量的不变性还有待进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologist-Manager Journal
Psychologist-Manager Journal PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders that don’t care: Investigating leader caregiving from an attachment-theoretical perspective. Value–task concordance as a predictor of job satisfaction and workplace engagement. Becoming an organizational leader: A different career path for psychologists. The road to gender equality: Persisting obstacles for American women in the workforce. The practice of management: The ascent of women as scholars and leaders in the field of zoo biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1