The Russian Diaspora in Mongolia: Stages of the Formation of Frontier Religiosity

Q3 Arts and Humanities Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10611959.2018.1470428
A. Mikhalev
{"title":"The Russian Diaspora in Mongolia: Stages of the Formation of Frontier Religiosity","authors":"A. Mikhalev","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2018.1470428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article, on the problem of religiosity in frontier communities, examines the transformation of ethnic Russian religiosity in Mongolia. In tracing how change in borders can affect religious identity, we find that a community existing under conditions of a constantly changing border most likely cannot preserve a religious tradition. With the end of the imperial period in Russia’s history, Orthodoxy became simply an element of collective memory, determining identity for ethnic Russians permanently residing in Mongolia. For this reason, the author introduces for scholarly circulation the concept of “memory of Orthodoxy.” It assumes a set of commemorative practices without church-going and without the church as a formal institution. Such lacuna led to a specific type of frontier religiosity, reliant on two or three traditions. Dual-faith and triple-faith are widespread phenomena among peoples of Inner Asia, often expressed as a combination of Buddhism and shamanism. Ethnic Russian colonization of Mongolia, launched from eastern Siberia where such practices were widely prevalent, led to their entrenchment. Cultural borrowings from the Mongols were not limited to religion alone; they involved language and everyday life. Russian identity was refined, as Russians became “local Russians” and then simply “locals.” The tie to local traditions and to the border as a resource opened new opportunities for a broader choice of confessions. The chronological span of the research encompasses the ethnic Russian diaspora in Mongolia from the late nineteenth century to the early twenty-first.","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611959.2018.1470428","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2018.1470428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article, on the problem of religiosity in frontier communities, examines the transformation of ethnic Russian religiosity in Mongolia. In tracing how change in borders can affect religious identity, we find that a community existing under conditions of a constantly changing border most likely cannot preserve a religious tradition. With the end of the imperial period in Russia’s history, Orthodoxy became simply an element of collective memory, determining identity for ethnic Russians permanently residing in Mongolia. For this reason, the author introduces for scholarly circulation the concept of “memory of Orthodoxy.” It assumes a set of commemorative practices without church-going and without the church as a formal institution. Such lacuna led to a specific type of frontier religiosity, reliant on two or three traditions. Dual-faith and triple-faith are widespread phenomena among peoples of Inner Asia, often expressed as a combination of Buddhism and shamanism. Ethnic Russian colonization of Mongolia, launched from eastern Siberia where such practices were widely prevalent, led to their entrenchment. Cultural borrowings from the Mongols were not limited to religion alone; they involved language and everyday life. Russian identity was refined, as Russians became “local Russians” and then simply “locals.” The tie to local traditions and to the border as a resource opened new opportunities for a broader choice of confessions. The chronological span of the research encompasses the ethnic Russian diaspora in Mongolia from the late nineteenth century to the early twenty-first.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旅居蒙古的俄罗斯人:边疆宗教形成的几个阶段
本文以边疆社区的宗教信仰问题为切入点,考察了蒙古国俄罗斯族宗教信仰的变迁。在追踪边界变化如何影响宗教身份的过程中,我们发现,在不断变化的边界条件下存在的社区很可能无法保持宗教传统。随着俄罗斯历史上帝国时期的结束,东正教成为集体记忆的一个元素,决定了永久居住在蒙古的俄罗斯人的身份。出于这个原因,作者引入了“东正教记忆”的概念,以供学术流通。它假设了一系列不去教堂、不把教堂作为正式机构的纪念活动。这种缺陷导致了一种特定类型的边疆宗教,依赖于两三种传统。双重信仰和三重信仰是内亚民族中普遍存在的现象,通常表现为佛教和萨满教的结合。俄罗斯民族从西伯利亚东部开始对蒙古进行殖民化,这种做法在那里广泛流行,导致了他们的根深蒂固。从蒙古人那里借来的文化不仅限于宗教;它们涉及语言和日常生活。俄罗斯人的身份得到了升华,俄罗斯人变成了“当地俄罗斯人”,然后简单地变成了“本地人”。与当地传统和边境作为一种资源的联系为更广泛的忏悔选择开辟了新的机会。研究的时间跨度涵盖了从19世纪末到21世纪初在蒙古的俄罗斯侨民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia presents scholarship from Russia, Siberia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia, the vast region that stretches from the Baltic to the Black Sea and from Lake Baikal to the Bering Strait. Each thematic issue, with a substantive introduction to the topic by the editor, features expertly translated and annotated manuscripts, articles, and book excerpts reporting fieldwork from every part of the region and theoretical studies on topics of special interest.
期刊最新文献
Dialogues with the Cold: Natural Low Temperatures in the Everyday Life of Rural Residents of Yakutia (Sakha Republic) in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries Introduction: Ecology Lessons: Community Solidarity, Indigenous Knowledge, Civic Society in Crisis Fire and Water: Indigenous Ecological Knowledge and Climate Challenges in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Manipulations of Public Consciousness in the Environmental Conflict on Kushtau On Defining and Registering the Indigenous Peoples of The North, Siberia and the Far East: Legal Process Documentation and Ramifications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1