La diferencia entre infracciones instantáneas y permanentes: a propósito de la infracción tipificada en el numeral 66) del artículo 134 del reglamento de la Ley General de Pesca

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW Vox Juris Pub Date : 2019-07-11 DOI:10.24265/VOXJURIS.2019.V37N2.03
Luis Jara
{"title":"La diferencia entre infracciones instantáneas y permanentes: a propósito de la infracción tipificada en el numeral 66) del artículo 134 del reglamento de la Ley General de Pesca","authors":"Luis Jara","doi":"10.24265/VOXJURIS.2019.V37N2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we analyze the difference between instantaneous and permanent administrative infractions, in light of article 252 of the Single Orderly Text of Law N° 27444, Law of General Administrative Procedure, approved by Supreme Decree N° 004-2019-JUS and the most approved doctrine; to then evaluate whether the infringement stipulated in the current numeral 66) of article 134 of the Regulations of the General Fishing Law, approved by Supreme Decree N° 012-2001-PE, amended by Supreme Decree N° 017-2017-PRODUCE, is an instantaneous infringement, as considered by the Sanctions Appeals Council of the Ministry of Production in Plenary Agreement N° 003-2017, by developing the legal nature of the same assumption of fact contained in the old infraction typified in numeral 101) of article 134 of the Regulations of the General Fishing Law, approved by Supreme Decree N° 012-2001-PE, modified by Supreme Decree N° 013-2009-PRODUCE, concluding that the Sanctions Appeals Council of the Ministry of Production is mistaken in considering the infraction in mention as instantaneous, because in fact is a permanent one.","PeriodicalId":40621,"journal":{"name":"Vox Juris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Juris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24265/VOXJURIS.2019.V37N2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the difference between instantaneous and permanent administrative infractions, in light of article 252 of the Single Orderly Text of Law N° 27444, Law of General Administrative Procedure, approved by Supreme Decree N° 004-2019-JUS and the most approved doctrine; to then evaluate whether the infringement stipulated in the current numeral 66) of article 134 of the Regulations of the General Fishing Law, approved by Supreme Decree N° 012-2001-PE, amended by Supreme Decree N° 017-2017-PRODUCE, is an instantaneous infringement, as considered by the Sanctions Appeals Council of the Ministry of Production in Plenary Agreement N° 003-2017, by developing the legal nature of the same assumption of fact contained in the old infraction typified in numeral 101) of article 134 of the Regulations of the General Fishing Law, approved by Supreme Decree N° 012-2001-PE, modified by Supreme Decree N° 013-2009-PRODUCE, concluding that the Sanctions Appeals Council of the Ministry of Production is mistaken in considering the infraction in mention as instantaneous, because in fact is a permanent one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瞬时侵权与永久侵权的区别:关于《一般渔业法条例》第134条第66款所界定的侵权
在本文中,我们根据最高法令第004-2019-JUS批准的《一般行政程序法》第27444号法律单一有序文本第252条和最受批准的原则,分析了即时行政违法和永久行政违法之间的区别;根据生产部制裁上诉委员会在第003-2017号全体协议中的审议结果,评估经第012-2001-PE号最高法令批准并经第017-2017-PRODUCE号最高法令修订的《一般捕鱼法条例》第134条现行数字66)中规定的侵权行为是否为即时侵权行为,通过发展经第012-2001-PE号最高法令批准并经第013-2009-PRODUCE号最高法令修订的《一般捕鱼法条例》第134条第101)号数字所代表的旧违法行为中包含的相同事实假设的法律性质,得出的结论是,生产部制裁上诉委员会错误地认为上述违规行为是即时的,因为事实上是永久性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vox Juris
Vox Juris LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
El impulso de la gamificación mediante las TIC en una comunidad virtual de aprendizaje Intervención jurídica de la Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia en el estudio de problemas de la población vulnerable en el caribe colombiano Contumacia y extradición como obstáculos para el cómputo del plazo de prescripción de la acción en el Código penal peruano Conflictos familiares y gastos extraordinarios en la pensión de alimentos: algunas cuestiones prácticas Sistema penitenciario chileno: hacia una nueva concepción desde un enfoque de justicia social
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1