Fighting terrorism at the local level: the European Union, radicalisation prevention and the negotiation of subsidiarity

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES European Security Pub Date : 2021-12-06 DOI:10.1080/09662839.2021.2009458
Francesca Melhuish, Charlotte Heath-Kelly
{"title":"Fighting terrorism at the local level: the European Union, radicalisation prevention and the negotiation of subsidiarity","authors":"Francesca Melhuish, Charlotte Heath-Kelly","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.2009458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, we investigate how the EU mobilises a spatio-temporal imaginary of the “local” in its counter-radicalisation activities as a means of navigating subsidiarity principles and expanding its remit as a “holistic security actor” (cf. Baker-Beall [2016]. The European Union’s fight against terrorism: discourse, policies, identity. Manchester: Manchester University Press). Extant work on the EU’s terrorism prevention efforts has focused on how the organisation constructs transnational terror threats that require supranational, EU-level responses. Our research makes an original contribution to these literatures by demonstrating how the EU also seeks to intervene “below” the level of the nation state. EU counter-radicalisation works directly with subnational actors in municipalities, cities, and frontline public services across Member States. Employing the first systematic analysis of the EU’s Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) outputs, we demonstrate how “the local” frames pre-emptive counter-terrorism interventions as “upstream”. “Closer”, or “localised”, reads as “earlier” in this discourse. We also unpack how EU institutions and Member States have voiced concerns about the circumvention of subsidiarity (through engagement with local actors across the Union), by criticising the “effectiveness” of RAN. While the European Commission has taken steps towards addressing these grievances, its proposals reflect a further renegotiation and repositioning of the EU as a security “facilitator” across spaces deemed simultaneously local and transnational.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Security","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.2009458","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this article, we investigate how the EU mobilises a spatio-temporal imaginary of the “local” in its counter-radicalisation activities as a means of navigating subsidiarity principles and expanding its remit as a “holistic security actor” (cf. Baker-Beall [2016]. The European Union’s fight against terrorism: discourse, policies, identity. Manchester: Manchester University Press). Extant work on the EU’s terrorism prevention efforts has focused on how the organisation constructs transnational terror threats that require supranational, EU-level responses. Our research makes an original contribution to these literatures by demonstrating how the EU also seeks to intervene “below” the level of the nation state. EU counter-radicalisation works directly with subnational actors in municipalities, cities, and frontline public services across Member States. Employing the first systematic analysis of the EU’s Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) outputs, we demonstrate how “the local” frames pre-emptive counter-terrorism interventions as “upstream”. “Closer”, or “localised”, reads as “earlier” in this discourse. We also unpack how EU institutions and Member States have voiced concerns about the circumvention of subsidiarity (through engagement with local actors across the Union), by criticising the “effectiveness” of RAN. While the European Commission has taken steps towards addressing these grievances, its proposals reflect a further renegotiation and repositioning of the EU as a security “facilitator” across spaces deemed simultaneously local and transnational.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在地方一级打击恐怖主义:欧洲联盟、防止激进化和辅助性谈判
在本文中,我们研究了欧盟如何在其反激进化活动中动员“地方”的时空想象,作为导航辅助原则和扩大其作为“整体安全行动者”的职权范围的手段(参见Baker-Beall[2016])。欧盟的反恐斗争:话语、政策、身份。曼彻斯特:曼彻斯特大学出版社)。欧盟预防恐怖主义的现有工作主要集中在该组织如何构建跨国恐怖主义威胁,这些威胁需要超国家的、欧盟层面的反应。我们的研究对这些文献做出了原创性的贡献,展示了欧盟如何也试图在民族国家的“以下”层面进行干预。欧盟反激进行动直接与各成员国市政当局、城市和一线公共服务部门的次国家行为体合作。采用欧盟激进意识网络(RAN)输出的第一个系统分析,我们展示了“本地”如何将先发制人的反恐干预框架为“上游”。“更近”,或“本地化”,在这个话语中读作“更早”。我们还通过批评RAN的“有效性”,揭示了欧盟机构和成员国是如何表达对规避辅助性(通过与欧盟各地的地方行动者接触)的担忧的。尽管欧盟委员会已采取措施解决这些不满,但其提议反映了欧盟进一步的重新谈判和重新定位,即作为一个跨越地方和跨国空间的安全“促进者”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Security
European Security Multiple-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The European Union's use of contractors in security and defence: blazing its own path of institutional change? Measuring the effectiveness of counter-disinformation strategies in the Czech security forces Diplomacy beyond the state: Ukrainian think tank experts as wartime diplomacy actors What can European security architecture look like in the wake of Russia’s war on Ukraine? New Russian migrants in Estonia: performative agency in insecure times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1