Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS

D. Senkowski, Rabea Sobirey, D. Haslacher, S. Soekadar
{"title":"Boosting working memory: uncovering the differential effects of tDCS and tACS","authors":"D. Senkowski, Rabea Sobirey, D. Haslacher, S. Soekadar","doi":"10.1093/texcom/tgac018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Working memory (WM) is essential for reasoning, decision-making, and problem solving. Recently, there has been an increasing effort in improving WM through noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), especially transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS/tACS). Studies suggest that tDCS and tACS can modulate WM performance, but large variability in research approaches hinders the identification of optimal stimulation protocols and interpretation of study results. Moreover, it is unclear whether tDCS and tACS differentially affect WM. Here, we summarize and compare studies examining the effects of tDCS and tACS on WM performance in healthy adults. Following PRISMA-selection criteria, our systematic review resulted in 43 studies (29 tDCS, 11 tACS, 3 both) with a total of 1826 adult participants. For tDCS, only 4 out of 23 single-session studies reported effects on WM, while 7 out of 9 multi-session experiments showed positive effects on WM training. For tACS, 10 out of 14 studies demonstrated effects on WM, which were frequency dependent and robust for frontoparietal stimulation. Our review revealed no reliable effect of single-session tDCS on WM but moderate effects of multi-session tDCS and single-session tACS. We discuss the implications of these findings and future directions in the emerging research field of NIBS and WM.","PeriodicalId":72551,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgac018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Abstract Working memory (WM) is essential for reasoning, decision-making, and problem solving. Recently, there has been an increasing effort in improving WM through noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), especially transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS/tACS). Studies suggest that tDCS and tACS can modulate WM performance, but large variability in research approaches hinders the identification of optimal stimulation protocols and interpretation of study results. Moreover, it is unclear whether tDCS and tACS differentially affect WM. Here, we summarize and compare studies examining the effects of tDCS and tACS on WM performance in healthy adults. Following PRISMA-selection criteria, our systematic review resulted in 43 studies (29 tDCS, 11 tACS, 3 both) with a total of 1826 adult participants. For tDCS, only 4 out of 23 single-session studies reported effects on WM, while 7 out of 9 multi-session experiments showed positive effects on WM training. For tACS, 10 out of 14 studies demonstrated effects on WM, which were frequency dependent and robust for frontoparietal stimulation. Our review revealed no reliable effect of single-session tDCS on WM but moderate effects of multi-session tDCS and single-session tACS. We discuss the implications of these findings and future directions in the emerging research field of NIBS and WM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进工作记忆:揭示tDCS和tACS的不同作用
抽象工作记忆(WM)对于推理、决策和解决问题至关重要。近年来,通过无创脑刺激(NIBS),特别是经颅直流和交流电刺激(tDCS/tACS)改善WM的研究越来越多。研究表明,tDCS和tACS可以调节WM性能,但研究方法的巨大差异阻碍了最佳刺激方案的确定和研究结果的解释。此外,尚不清楚tDCS和tACS对WM的影响是否存在差异。在这里,我们总结并比较了研究tDCS和tACS对健康成人WM表现的影响。根据prisma选择标准,我们的系统评价结果是43项研究(29项tDCS, 11项tACS, 3项两者都有),共有1826名成人参与者。对于tDCS, 23个单次实验中只有4个报告了对WM的影响,而9个多次实验中有7个显示了对WM训练的积极影响。对于tACS, 14项研究中有10项证明了对WM的影响,这是频率依赖性的,并且对额顶刺激具有鲁棒性。我们的回顾显示,单次tDCS对WM没有可靠的影响,但多次tDCS和单次tACS有中等效果。我们讨论了这些发现的意义以及NIBS和WM新兴研究领域的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
On the coupling and decoupling of mind wandering and perception: a shared metabolism account. Striatal correlates of Bayesian beliefs in self-efficacy in adolescents and their relation to mood and autonomy: a pilot study Frontal mechanisms underlying primate calls recognition by humans Detection and characterization of resting state functional networks in squirrel monkey brain. Methamphetamine enhances neural activation during anticipation of loss in the monetary incentive delay task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1