Hierarchy between Domestic and International Tribunals: Utopia or Near Future?

Virdzhiniya Petrova Georgieva
{"title":"Hierarchy between Domestic and International Tribunals: Utopia or Near Future?","authors":"Virdzhiniya Petrova Georgieva","doi":"10.12804/REVISTAS.UROSARIO.EDU.CO/ACDI/A.10114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The establishment of a formal hierarchy between domestic and international tribunals has traditionally been a “taboo” for international legal scholars and operators of the domestic and international legal systems. However, it is possible and desirable to envisage hierarchy between domestic and international tribunals. Hierarchy is a strong mechanism that permits the efficient enforcement of judicial decisions and the avoidance of all types of conflicts between the judicial organs operating within a legal order. It also fosters the uniformity and predictability in the application and interpretation of the same body of legal rules by many different tribunals. Finally, hierarchy is a strong incentive for the observance of equality before the law of the actors in judicial proceedings. Both domestic and international tribunals have already used hierarchical tools when faced with the regulation of their relationships. Consequently, it appears that the establishment of a hierarchy between * Researcher from the Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas and teacher of Derecho Internacional Público y Privado at the Facultad de Derecho of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (unam). Graduate and specialist in European Union Law and International Law and Economics at Sorbonne Law School, Paris I. Master in and Doctor of Derecho Internacional at unam. Email: virginia.geor@derecho.unam.mx To cite this article: Petrova Georgieva, Virdzhiniya. “Hierarchy between Domestic and International Tribunals: Utopia or Near Future?” Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional (acdi), 14 (2021): 173-223. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/acdi/a.8013","PeriodicalId":40328,"journal":{"name":"Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional-ACDI","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional-ACDI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12804/REVISTAS.UROSARIO.EDU.CO/ACDI/A.10114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The establishment of a formal hierarchy between domestic and international tribunals has traditionally been a “taboo” for international legal scholars and operators of the domestic and international legal systems. However, it is possible and desirable to envisage hierarchy between domestic and international tribunals. Hierarchy is a strong mechanism that permits the efficient enforcement of judicial decisions and the avoidance of all types of conflicts between the judicial organs operating within a legal order. It also fosters the uniformity and predictability in the application and interpretation of the same body of legal rules by many different tribunals. Finally, hierarchy is a strong incentive for the observance of equality before the law of the actors in judicial proceedings. Both domestic and international tribunals have already used hierarchical tools when faced with the regulation of their relationships. Consequently, it appears that the establishment of a hierarchy between * Researcher from the Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas and teacher of Derecho Internacional Público y Privado at the Facultad de Derecho of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (unam). Graduate and specialist in European Union Law and International Law and Economics at Sorbonne Law School, Paris I. Master in and Doctor of Derecho Internacional at unam. Email: virginia.geor@derecho.unam.mx To cite this article: Petrova Georgieva, Virdzhiniya. “Hierarchy between Domestic and International Tribunals: Utopia or Near Future?” Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional (acdi), 14 (2021): 173-223. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/acdi/a.8013
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国内和国际法庭的等级制度:乌托邦还是不远的将来?
在国内和国际法庭之间建立正式的等级制度历来是国际法律学者和国内和国际法律制度的执行者的“禁忌”。然而,设想国内法庭和国际法庭之间的等级制度是可能和可取的。等级制度是一种强有力的机制,可以有效地执行司法决定,并避免在法律秩序内运作的司法机关之间的各种冲突。它还促进了许多不同法庭在适用和解释同一法律规则方面的统一性和可预测性。最后,等级制度是司法程序中行为者遵守法律面前平等的强烈动机。国内和国际法庭在面对其关系的监管时,都已经使用了等级工具。因此,似乎在调查研究所研究员Jurídicas和国立大学Autónoma de msamxico (unam)学院的国际Derecho教师Público和私人教师之间建立了一个等级制度。巴黎索邦大学法学院欧盟法和国际法律与经济学研究生和专家。巴黎索邦大学国际法学硕士和博士。邮箱:virginia.geor@derecho.unam.mx本文引用:Petrova Georgieva, Virdzhiniya。国内和国际法庭的等级制度:乌托邦还是不远的将来?国际哥伦比亚研究,14(2021):173-223。https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/acdi/a.8013
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: El Anuario es una publicación científica arbitrada que tiene como objetivo difundir, en Colombia y en el exterior, la producción de conocimiento sobre Derecho Internacional. Para ello, publica artículos inéditos en las áreas del Derecho Internacional Público, Derecho Internacional Privado, Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos, Derecho Internacional Económico y Arbitraje Internacional de Inversión escritos por investigadores nacionales y extranjeros. Su periodicidad es anual y el volumen del año correspondiente se publica en el mes de enero. Se reciben contribuciones en español, inglés, francés y portugués.
期刊最新文献
Función Del Notario En Las Voluntades Anticipadas Como manifestación De La Autonomía De La Persona Según La Ley 68 De 2003. La evaluación del impacto ambiental en el esperado acuerdo para la gobernanza de la biodiversidad marina fuera de la jurisdicción nacional y su previsible aplicación a las tecnologías para la obtención de energía renovable marina Resistencia y retroceso (backlash) contra las sentencias de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos: Estudio de 11 casos de reacciones de los Estados a la autoridad del tribunal y la recusación de jueces en el caso “Bedoya Lima” Derecho de las relaciones exteriores, Derecho internacional comparado y el papel de los tribunales nacionales en la justicia transicional: los casos de Argentina y España El nuevo orden jurídico internacional en materia tributaria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1