Color terminology, sensory stimuli, and the semantics of the questionnaire

IF 0.5 Q1 Arts and Humanities Intellectual History Review Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17496977.2022.2096768
Judith R. H. Kaplan
{"title":"Color terminology, sensory stimuli, and the semantics of the questionnaire","authors":"Judith R. H. Kaplan","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2022.2096768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article attends to “questionnaires” in linguistic fieldwork defined by the inclusion of sensory stimuli. It shows that such non-verbal protocols have been used to help elucidate and compare semantic content, which has generally been subordinated to formal analysis in the history of linguistics. To explain and exemplify this relationship, I target the color questionnaire developed by Hugo Magnus, which included ten standardized color chips and a long list of interview questions on language use. Magnus’s questionnaire (Fragebogen) decoupled perception and denotation in its day, though similar protocols have recently been employed to restore the connection between meaning and form.","PeriodicalId":39827,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual History Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"575 - 598"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2096768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article attends to “questionnaires” in linguistic fieldwork defined by the inclusion of sensory stimuli. It shows that such non-verbal protocols have been used to help elucidate and compare semantic content, which has generally been subordinated to formal analysis in the history of linguistics. To explain and exemplify this relationship, I target the color questionnaire developed by Hugo Magnus, which included ten standardized color chips and a long list of interview questions on language use. Magnus’s questionnaire (Fragebogen) decoupled perception and denotation in its day, though similar protocols have recently been employed to restore the connection between meaning and form.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颜色术语、感觉刺激和问卷的语义
摘要:本文关注语言学田野调查中的“问卷调查”,其中包括感官刺激。这表明,这种非语言协议已被用于帮助阐明和比较语义内容,而语义内容在语言学史上通常隶属于形式分析。为了解释和举例说明这种关系,我以Hugo Magnus开发的颜色问卷为目标,其中包括十个标准化的颜色芯片和一长串关于语言使用的面试问题。Magnus的问卷(Fragebogen)在当时将感知和外延分离开来,尽管最近也采用了类似的协议来恢复意义和形式之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intellectual History Review
Intellectual History Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
The translation of Saints and the Confucian discourse of sages in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century China: the examples of Alfonso Vagnone, Zhang Xingyao and Yan Mo Transwriting in Aleni’s Xingxue cushu : communicating the philosophy of human nature between the West and late Ming China From sanctus to shengren : mediating Christian and Chinese concepts of human excellence in early modern China Mandeville’s fable: pride, hypocrisy, and sociability Mandeville’s fable: pride, hypocrisy, and sociability , by Robin Douglass, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2023, 256 pp., £30(hb), ISBN 9780691219172 De Peccato Originali (On Original Sin 1679) De Peccato Originali (On Original Sin 1679) , by Hadriaan Beverland, annotated, edited and translated into English by Karen Eline Hollewand and Floris Verhaart, Leiden, Brill, 2023, xxi+365 pp., €119.00(hb), ISBN 978-90-04-34285-9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1