Preliminary Clinical Exploration of Scleral Lens Performance on Normal Eyes

M. Barnett, Jonathon E Ross, B. Durbin-Johnson
{"title":"Preliminary Clinical Exploration of Scleral Lens Performance on Normal Eyes","authors":"M. Barnett, Jonathon E Ross, B. Durbin-Johnson","doi":"10.22374/JCLRS.V2I2.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nObjectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance (i.e. vision, comfort and fit) of spherical and front-surface toric scleral lenses in subjects with regular, healthy corneas. \nMethods: Scleral lenses were fitin the eyes (n = 16) of healthy subjects (n = 9) with regular corneas, absent of pathology, and studied using an observational, multi-visit design. Lens fit was objectively evaluatedby an experienced practitioner.Following 1 month of successful lens wear, participants completedsubjective satisfaction surveys regarding the scleral lens wearing experience. \nResults:  According to participant surveys, scleral lenses were subjectively preferred over soft toric or gas permeable contact lenses in 88% of eyes, including in all eyes fit with a front-surface toric scleral lens (n = 3). Seventy-five percent (75%) of eyes achieved visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better, while all eyes with prior spectacle wear achieved visual acuity with a scleral lens within 1 Snellen line of spectacle correction. Seventy-five percent (75%) of eyes achieved good subjective comfort with a scleral lens. No participants reported poor subjective vision and/or comfort. \nConclusions:  Our findings suggest that subjects preferred the performance of a scleral lens (spherical or front-surface toric) compared to a soft toric or gas permeable contact lens. Moreover, scleral lenses may provide a viable, alternative contact lens modality option for patients considering discontinuation of traditional soft toric and/or rigid contact lens wear; so long as the factors associated with hypoxia remain minimized. \nKey Words:  scleral lens; scleral contact lens; front-surface toric scleral lens; lens performance; normal eyes; healthy eyes","PeriodicalId":73690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contact lens research & science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contact lens research & science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22374/JCLRS.V2I2.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance (i.e. vision, comfort and fit) of spherical and front-surface toric scleral lenses in subjects with regular, healthy corneas. Methods: Scleral lenses were fitin the eyes (n = 16) of healthy subjects (n = 9) with regular corneas, absent of pathology, and studied using an observational, multi-visit design. Lens fit was objectively evaluatedby an experienced practitioner.Following 1 month of successful lens wear, participants completedsubjective satisfaction surveys regarding the scleral lens wearing experience. Results:  According to participant surveys, scleral lenses were subjectively preferred over soft toric or gas permeable contact lenses in 88% of eyes, including in all eyes fit with a front-surface toric scleral lens (n = 3). Seventy-five percent (75%) of eyes achieved visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better, while all eyes with prior spectacle wear achieved visual acuity with a scleral lens within 1 Snellen line of spectacle correction. Seventy-five percent (75%) of eyes achieved good subjective comfort with a scleral lens. No participants reported poor subjective vision and/or comfort. Conclusions:  Our findings suggest that subjects preferred the performance of a scleral lens (spherical or front-surface toric) compared to a soft toric or gas permeable contact lens. Moreover, scleral lenses may provide a viable, alternative contact lens modality option for patients considering discontinuation of traditional soft toric and/or rigid contact lens wear; so long as the factors associated with hypoxia remain minimized. Key Words:  scleral lens; scleral contact lens; front-surface toric scleral lens; lens performance; normal eyes; healthy eyes
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常眼巩膜性晶状体表现的初步临床探讨
摘要目的:本研究的目的是评估具有规则、健康角膜的受试者使用球形和前表面复曲面巩膜晶状体的性能(即视力、舒适度和贴合度)。方法:对健康受试者(n=9)的角膜规则、无病理的眼睛(n=16)进行巩膜镜检查,并采用观察性多访视设计进行研究。由一位经验丰富的从业者对镜片的贴合度进行了客观评估。在成功佩戴晶状体1个月后,参与者完成了关于巩膜晶状体佩戴体验的主体满意度调查。结果:根据参与者调查,88%的眼睛主观上更喜欢巩膜晶状体,而不是软复曲面或透气性隐形眼镜,包括所有佩戴前表面复曲面巩膜晶状体的眼睛(n=3)。百分之七十五(75%)的眼睛达到0.1 logMAR或更高的视力,而所有先前佩戴眼镜的眼睛在眼镜矫正的1 Snellen线内使用巩膜晶状体达到视力。百分之七十五(75%)的眼睛使用巩膜晶状体获得了良好的主观舒适度。没有参与者报告主观视觉和/或舒适度差。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与软复曲面或透气隐形眼镜相比,受试者更喜欢巩膜晶状体(球形或前表面复曲面)的性能。此外,巩膜镜片可以为考虑停止传统的软复曲面和/或刚性隐形眼镜佩戴的患者提供一种可行的替代隐形眼镜模式选择;只要与缺氧相关的因素保持最小化。关键词:巩膜晶状体;巩膜接触镜;前表面复曲面巩膜晶状体;镜头性能;正常眼;健康的眼睛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opportunities for Improving the Long-term Management of Keratoconus Patients. CONTACT LENS MODIFICATIONS FOR BOSTON KERATOPROSTHESIS EVALUATION OF WEAR EXPERIENCE WITH WATER SURFACE DAILY DISPOSABLE LENSES IN SATISFIED REUSABLE SOFT CONTACT LENS WEARERS. RESHAPING TORIC CORNEAS WITH ORTHOKERATOLOGY REGIONAL VARIATION IN FLUID RESERVOIR THICKNESS, OXYGEN TRANSMISSIBILITY AND CORNEAL OEDEMA DURING SCLERAL LENS WEAR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1