Reappraising the EU-Turkey Refugee Statement within the Human Rights and Neoliberalism Nexus

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of European Integration Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1080/07036337.2023.2243539
Sinem Bal
{"title":"Reappraising the EU-Turkey Refugee Statement within the Human Rights and Neoliberalism Nexus","authors":"Sinem Bal","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2023.2243539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Instead of acting consistently with international law and its own refugee law, the EU has adopted an ambivalent stance over refugee arrivals to Europe. Member states’ increasing anxiety led the EU to tighten border controls and outsource its humanitarian responsibilities by agreeing on a statement with Turkey to prevent refugees from entering the EU irregularly. This paper focuses on the human rights breaches and contradictions of the EU-Turkey Statement by specifically investigating the one-in-one-out mechanism and the argument that Turkey is safe country. It is argued that the Statement has turned the refugee issue into the subject of the European market because the political architecture of EU human rights norms has historically been part of the neoliberal hegemony. Hence, the refugee case reveals how inadequately produced norms inside Europe’s borders reproduce inequalities and cause mismatches between the EU’s claimed role as rights promoter and its practical inadequacies and market-based pragmatism.","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":"45 1","pages":"1035 - 1053"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2243539","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Instead of acting consistently with international law and its own refugee law, the EU has adopted an ambivalent stance over refugee arrivals to Europe. Member states’ increasing anxiety led the EU to tighten border controls and outsource its humanitarian responsibilities by agreeing on a statement with Turkey to prevent refugees from entering the EU irregularly. This paper focuses on the human rights breaches and contradictions of the EU-Turkey Statement by specifically investigating the one-in-one-out mechanism and the argument that Turkey is safe country. It is argued that the Statement has turned the refugee issue into the subject of the European market because the political architecture of EU human rights norms has historically been part of the neoliberal hegemony. Hence, the refugee case reveals how inadequately produced norms inside Europe’s borders reproduce inequalities and cause mismatches between the EU’s claimed role as rights promoter and its practical inadequacies and market-based pragmatism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在人权和新自由主义关系中重新评价欧盟-土耳其难民声明
欧盟没有按照国际法和自己的难民法行事,而是对抵达欧洲的难民采取了矛盾的立场。成员国日益加剧的焦虑促使欧盟加强了边境控制,并将其人道主义责任外包给土耳其,同意与土耳其达成一项声明,以防止难民不定期进入欧盟。本文通过具体考察“一进一出”机制和“土耳其是安全国家”的说法,对欧盟-土耳其声明的人权侵犯和矛盾进行了分析。有人认为,《声明》将难民问题变成了欧洲市场的主题,因为欧盟人权规范的政治架构在历史上一直是新自由主义霸权的一部分。因此,难民案例揭示了欧洲内部不充分的规范是如何再现不平等的,并导致欧盟声称的权利促进者的角色与它的实际不足和基于市场的实用主义之间的不匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
External shocks, policy spillovers, and veto players: (post)exceptionalist common agricultural policy and the case of the 2023-2027 reform The Roma and the double-movement of Social Europe Democracy and European Union: beyond the dichotomy The quiet politics of migration supranationalization – Commission entrepreneurship and the intra-Corporate Transferee Directive The COVID-19 pandemic and institutional change in the EU’s financial assistance regime: the governance of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1