Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression of the Lumbar Spine for Stable Degenerative Spondylolisthesis as the Least Invasive Surgical Treatment Using the YESS Surgery Technique
{"title":"Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression of the Lumbar Spine for Stable Degenerative Spondylolisthesis as the Least Invasive Surgical Treatment Using the YESS Surgery Technique","authors":"A. Yeung, Vit Kotheeranurak","doi":"10.4172/2165-7939.1000407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anthony T. Yeung M.D., has reported his 5-10-year results in a preliminary review of endoscopic transforaminal of isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis decompression causing sciatica and back pain at international spine meetings. Fifty-five patients from January 2002-December 2012 served as the database for the clinical presentation in patients who specifically chose to stage Yeung’s endoscopic transforaminal decompressive procedure over fusion. The patients were specifically evaluated for endoscopic spine surgery in a shared clinical decision. \nThis more focused article is subdivided with stratified indications to degenerative spondylolisthesis only, omitting isthmic spondylolisthesis since isthmic spondylolisthesis is traditionally the surgical option of choice for patients who elected to undergo surgical intervention as the standard surgical option versus continuing with non-surgical care. Disc protrusions associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis, disc herniation, patients with concomitant stenosis, who did well with the first study on both degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis were analyzed from the first database and stratified for degenerative spondylolisthesis. The patients of the original 10-year follow-up study were 100% satisfied with their decision to try the endoscopic surgery first, even when they subsequently opted for fusion since it would not interfere with a fusion as a secondary staged procedure. There was no attempt to stratify the first patient group who wanted to stage their surgical options, even if fusion became necessary for their pain and activity requirements. \nIn this 10-year study 33% eventually opted to undergo fusion in order to get more symptom relief. Transforaminal foraminoplasty also provided some unanticipated back pain relief as well. When dorsal endoscopic ablation of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus was later added to the endoscopic procedure to address axial back pain, even better clinical outcomes were obtained by this focused study on degenerative spondylolisthesis, with or without disc protrusion and stenosis.","PeriodicalId":89593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7939.1000407","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7939.1000407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Anthony T. Yeung M.D., has reported his 5-10-year results in a preliminary review of endoscopic transforaminal of isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis decompression causing sciatica and back pain at international spine meetings. Fifty-five patients from January 2002-December 2012 served as the database for the clinical presentation in patients who specifically chose to stage Yeung’s endoscopic transforaminal decompressive procedure over fusion. The patients were specifically evaluated for endoscopic spine surgery in a shared clinical decision.
This more focused article is subdivided with stratified indications to degenerative spondylolisthesis only, omitting isthmic spondylolisthesis since isthmic spondylolisthesis is traditionally the surgical option of choice for patients who elected to undergo surgical intervention as the standard surgical option versus continuing with non-surgical care. Disc protrusions associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis, disc herniation, patients with concomitant stenosis, who did well with the first study on both degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis were analyzed from the first database and stratified for degenerative spondylolisthesis. The patients of the original 10-year follow-up study were 100% satisfied with their decision to try the endoscopic surgery first, even when they subsequently opted for fusion since it would not interfere with a fusion as a secondary staged procedure. There was no attempt to stratify the first patient group who wanted to stage their surgical options, even if fusion became necessary for their pain and activity requirements.
In this 10-year study 33% eventually opted to undergo fusion in order to get more symptom relief. Transforaminal foraminoplasty also provided some unanticipated back pain relief as well. When dorsal endoscopic ablation of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus was later added to the endoscopic procedure to address axial back pain, even better clinical outcomes were obtained by this focused study on degenerative spondylolisthesis, with or without disc protrusion and stenosis.
Anthony T.Yeung医学博士在国际脊椎会议上报道了他在一项关于内镜下经椎间孔峡部和退行性滑脱减压导致坐骨神经痛和背痛的5-10年研究结果。自2002年1月至2012年12月,共有55名患者作为临床表现的数据库,这些患者专门选择在融合术后进行Yeung的内窥镜经孔减压手术。在共同的临床决策中,对患者进行了专门的脊柱内窥镜手术评估。这篇更为集中的文章只对退行性滑脱进行了分层适应症细分,省略了峡部滑脱,因为峡部滑脱传统上是选择手术干预作为标准手术选择的患者的手术选择,而不是继续非手术治疗。从第一个数据库中分析与退行性滑脱相关的椎间盘突出、椎间盘突出和伴行狭窄的患者,这些患者在退行性滑脱和峡部滑脱的第一项研究中表现良好,并对退行性滑脱进行分层。最初的10年随访研究的患者对他们首先尝试内窥镜手术的决定100%满意,即使他们后来选择了融合,因为这不会干扰作为二级手术的融合。即使融合对他们的疼痛和活动需求是必要的,也没有试图对第一个想要分期手术选择的患者组进行分层。在这项为期10年的研究中,33%的患者最终选择接受融合治疗,以获得更多的症状缓解。椎间孔成形术也提供了一些意想不到的背痛缓解。当背侧支内侧支的背侧内镜消融后来被添加到内镜手术中以解决轴性背痛时,通过这项针对退行性脊椎滑脱(伴有或不伴有椎间盘突出和狭窄)的重点研究,获得了更好的临床结果。