Philosophy of Emancipatory Education through the Masters of Suspicion

Jurnal Filsafat Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI:10.22146/jf.67429
J. Simon, I. G. N. Arnawa
{"title":"Philosophy of Emancipatory Education through the Masters of Suspicion","authors":"J. Simon, I. G. N. Arnawa","doi":"10.22146/jf.67429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" This paper will answer what the masters of suspicion say about the construction of today’s relevant philosophy of education. This paper is a qualitative research intended to construct meaning through a literature search on selected reading sources. The hermeneutic perspective used in this paper means an attempt to put the text, namely the thoughts of these masters of suspicion, in the present context to construct a meaning for the relevant philosophy of education. Three masters of suspicion, i.e. Marx, Freud, and Nietzsche, spoke respectively of a critical task in the realm of human action. Marx suspected that economic motives are often not to support life but to suppress it instead. Nietzsche suspected that religion only produced decadent and timid humans so they never became their true selves, hypocrite, and like to scare others. Freud was suspicious of human subconscious motivation so it must be seriously criticized in order to bring out an action that is truly born of compassionate political and social morality. These three masters present important education values to be developed today, namely education for social change, empowerment, and building compassionate social and political morality.","PeriodicalId":32273,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Filsafat","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Filsafat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.67429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

 This paper will answer what the masters of suspicion say about the construction of today’s relevant philosophy of education. This paper is a qualitative research intended to construct meaning through a literature search on selected reading sources. The hermeneutic perspective used in this paper means an attempt to put the text, namely the thoughts of these masters of suspicion, in the present context to construct a meaning for the relevant philosophy of education. Three masters of suspicion, i.e. Marx, Freud, and Nietzsche, spoke respectively of a critical task in the realm of human action. Marx suspected that economic motives are often not to support life but to suppress it instead. Nietzsche suspected that religion only produced decadent and timid humans so they never became their true selves, hypocrite, and like to scare others. Freud was suspicious of human subconscious motivation so it must be seriously criticized in order to bring out an action that is truly born of compassionate political and social morality. These three masters present important education values to be developed today, namely education for social change, empowerment, and building compassionate social and political morality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
怀疑大师的解放教育哲学
本文将回答怀疑论大师们对当今相关教育哲学建构的看法。本文是一项质性研究,旨在通过对选定阅读材料的文献检索来构建意义。本文所使用的解释学视角,是试图将文本,即这些怀疑大师的思想,置于当前的语境中,为相关的教育哲学建构意义。怀疑论的三位大师,即马克思、弗洛伊德和尼采,分别谈到了人类行为领域中的一项关键任务。马克思怀疑,经济动机往往不是支持生活,而是压制生活。尼采怀疑宗教只会产生颓废和胆怯的人类,所以他们永远不会成为真正的自我,伪君子,喜欢吓唬别人。弗洛伊德对人类的潜意识动机持怀疑态度,因此必须对其进行严肃的批评,以便提出一种真正源于富有同情心的政治和社会道德的行动。这三位大师提出了今天需要发展的重要教育价值观,即社会变革、赋权和建立富有同情心的社会和政治道德的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assimilation of Tung Chung Shu’s Philosophy and the Development of Multiculturalism The Role of the Concept of Agape in Improving Aristotle’s Ethics Slavoj Zizek’s Criticism of Neoliberalism and Radical Political Subjects Historical Analysis of Interactive Gamification Research: A Literature Review with Kuhn and Lakatos’ Approaches The Origins and Values of Javanese Philosophy in Nyadran with Goat-Cow Slaughter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1