Omission, erasure and obfuscation in the police institutional killing of Black men

IF 0.7 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Mortality Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/13576275.2023.2190451
Patrick G. Williams, Lizzie White, Scarlet Harris, Remi Joseph-Salisbury
{"title":"Omission, erasure and obfuscation in the police institutional killing of Black men","authors":"Patrick G. Williams, Lizzie White, Scarlet Harris, Remi Joseph-Salisbury","doi":"10.1080/13576275.2023.2190451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Between 1990 and the time of writing, 1,849 people have died in police custody or otherwise following police contact in England and Wales, with people from racially minoritised backgrounds over-represented in use of force and restraint related deaths. Drawing upon research undertaken by the authors, alongside bereaved families, this paper approaches these deaths as a form of institutional killings, surfacing the norms, cultures and values which systematically omit, obfuscate and mystify the violence of police action and inaction that eventuates these deaths. We contend that the police use of lethal force is therefore embedded and enmeshed within the processes, attitudes and behaviours of the police as an institution – both historically and in the present – which shapes how those killed encounter the police, how their deaths are (re)presented and how their bereaved families experience the processes which follow. The article argues that these processes follow a predictable pattern, with a similar lack of accountability also observable across other aspects of the criminal justice sector in relation to state deaths.","PeriodicalId":40045,"journal":{"name":"Mortality","volume":"28 1","pages":"250 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mortality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2023.2190451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Between 1990 and the time of writing, 1,849 people have died in police custody or otherwise following police contact in England and Wales, with people from racially minoritised backgrounds over-represented in use of force and restraint related deaths. Drawing upon research undertaken by the authors, alongside bereaved families, this paper approaches these deaths as a form of institutional killings, surfacing the norms, cultures and values which systematically omit, obfuscate and mystify the violence of police action and inaction that eventuates these deaths. We contend that the police use of lethal force is therefore embedded and enmeshed within the processes, attitudes and behaviours of the police as an institution – both historically and in the present – which shapes how those killed encounter the police, how their deaths are (re)presented and how their bereaved families experience the processes which follow. The article argues that these processes follow a predictable pattern, with a similar lack of accountability also observable across other aspects of the criminal justice sector in relation to state deaths.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警察机构杀害黑人中的疏漏、抹杀和混淆
摘要从1990年到撰写本文之时,英格兰和威尔士共有1849人在警方拘留期间或与警方接触后死亡,其中少数种族背景的人在使用武力和约束相关的死亡中所占比例过高。根据作者与死者家属一起进行的研究,本文将这些死亡视为一种制度性杀戮,揭示了规范、文化和价值观,这些规范、文化、价值观系统地忽略、混淆和混淆了导致这些死亡的警察作为和不作为的暴力行为。因此,我们认为,无论是历史上还是现在,警察使用致命武力的行为都植根于警察作为一个机构的过程、态度和行为中,这决定了被杀者如何与警察相遇,他们的死亡是如何(重新)呈现的,以及他们失去亲人的家人如何经历随后的过程。文章认为,这些程序遵循一种可预测的模式,在刑事司法部门与国家死亡有关的其他方面也存在类似的问责制缺失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mortality
Mortality Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: A foremost international, interdisciplinary journal that has relevance both for academics and professionals concerned with human mortality. Mortality is essential reading for those in the field of death studies and in a range of disciplines, including anthropology, art, classics, history, literature, medicine, music, socio-legal studies, social policy, sociology, philosophy, psychology and religious studies. The journal is also of special interest and relevance for those professionally or voluntarily engaged in the health and caring professions, in bereavement counselling, the funeral industries, and in central and local government.
期刊最新文献
Death enchanted: comparing conventional and conservation burial in the United States with a technological mediation lens Can death be casual: the paradox in Death Café blogs Respect, agency, and posthumous wishes Caring for the dead at home: an exploratory study of home deathcare in England The communicative functions of epitaphs in the linguistic landscape of Libingan ng mga Bayani (Heroes’ Cemetery), Philippines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1