Ya gotta wanna: Shifting motivational priorities in the self-control process

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-11-07 DOI:10.1002/jts5.119
Keemia Vaghef, Patrick D. Converse, Katrina P. Merlini, Nicholas A. Moon
{"title":"Ya gotta wanna: Shifting motivational priorities in the self-control process","authors":"Keemia Vaghef,&nbsp;Patrick D. Converse,&nbsp;Katrina P. Merlini,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Moon","doi":"10.1002/jts5.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Self-control has important consequences, but key questions remain regarding the underlying mechanisms involved in self-control over time. This research examined this issue, focusing on the process model of depletion. In particular, this study examined have-to and want-to motivation over time to provide a direct examination of central process model propositions and to investigate extensions to this model involving antecedents and outcomes associated with individual differences in have-to and want-to slopes and intercepts. Participants (<i>N</i> = 238) were presented with a self-control task for 45 min and reported have-to and want-to motivation levels every three minutes. Delay of gratification, future time perspective (antecedents), and task performance (outcome) were also measured. Results from multilevel modeling analyses indicated that have-to motivation decreased over time, want-to motivation increased over time, total time on the self-control task predicted have-to slope, future time perspective predicted have-to intercept, and have-to slope predicted task performance. These findings provide support for aspects of the process model, lead to new insights regarding self-control over time, and suggest additional directions for future research to further expand our understanding of control processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 4","pages":"564-575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-control has important consequences, but key questions remain regarding the underlying mechanisms involved in self-control over time. This research examined this issue, focusing on the process model of depletion. In particular, this study examined have-to and want-to motivation over time to provide a direct examination of central process model propositions and to investigate extensions to this model involving antecedents and outcomes associated with individual differences in have-to and want-to slopes and intercepts. Participants (N = 238) were presented with a self-control task for 45 min and reported have-to and want-to motivation levels every three minutes. Delay of gratification, future time perspective (antecedents), and task performance (outcome) were also measured. Results from multilevel modeling analyses indicated that have-to motivation decreased over time, want-to motivation increased over time, total time on the self-control task predicted have-to slope, future time perspective predicted have-to intercept, and have-to slope predicted task performance. These findings provide support for aspects of the process model, lead to new insights regarding self-control over time, and suggest additional directions for future research to further expand our understanding of control processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你要想:在自我控制过程中改变动机优先级
自我控制有重要的影响,但随着时间的推移,关于自我控制的潜在机制的关键问题仍然存在。本研究考察了这一问题,重点关注损耗的过程模型。特别是,随着时间的推移,本研究检查了必须和想要动机,以提供对中心过程模型命题的直接检查,并调查该模型的扩展,涉及与必须和想要斜率和截距的个体差异相关的前提和结果。参与者(N = 238)被要求进行45分钟的自我控制任务,每三分钟报告一次“必须”和“想要”的动机水平。延迟满足、未来时间观(前因)和任务表现(结果)也被测量。多层模型分析结果表明,“不得不”动机随时间的推移而减少,“想要”动机随时间的推移而增加,自我控制任务的总时间预测“不得不”斜率,未来时间前景预测“不得不”截距,“不得不”斜率预测任务绩效。这些发现为过程模型的各个方面提供了支持,带来了关于自我控制的新见解,并为未来的研究提供了额外的方向,以进一步扩大我们对控制过程的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Back to School After COVID-19: The Views of Psychological Counselors at Schools About the Effects of the Pandemic on Students Social Capital and Depressive Symptoms: A Systematic Review Mindfulness to Mental Health: Exploring Bibliometric Pathways via Metacognition, Rumination, and Emotion Regulation Differential Pattern of Consequences of Self-Compassion Across Gender Individual and Contextual Factors Associated With the Prevention of Corruption: A Qualitative Study Among Iranian Public Employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1