The Stellenbosch Consensus on the International Legal Obligation to Collaborate and Assist in Addressing Pandemics

Margherita M. Cinà, S. Hoffman, G. Burci, T. C. D. Campos, Danwood Chirwa, Stéphanie Dagron, Mark Eccleston-Turner, L. Forman, L. Gostin, Roojin Habibi, B. Meier, S. Negri, G. Ooms, S. Sekalala, Allyn L. Taylor, A. Yamin
{"title":"The Stellenbosch Consensus on the International Legal Obligation to Collaborate and Assist in Addressing Pandemics","authors":"Margherita M. Cinà, S. Hoffman, G. Burci, T. C. D. Campos, Danwood Chirwa, Stéphanie Dagron, Mark Eccleston-Turner, L. Forman, L. Gostin, Roojin Habibi, B. Meier, S. Negri, G. Ooms, S. Sekalala, Allyn L. Taylor, A. Yamin","doi":"10.1163/15723747-2020024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe International Health Regulations (ihr), of which the World Health Organization is custodian, govern how countries collectively promote global health security, including prevention, detection, and response to potential global health emergencies such as the ongoing covid-19 pandemic. While Article 44 of this binding legal instrument requires countries to collaborate and assist each other in meeting their respective obligations, recent events demonstrate that the precise nature and scope of these legal obligations are ill-understood. A shared understanding of the level and type of collaboration legally required by the ihr is a necessary step in ensuring these obligations can be acted upon and fully realized, and in fostering global solidarity and resilience in the face of future pandemics. In this consensus statement, public international law scholars specializing in global health consider the legal meaning of Article 44 using the interpretive framework of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.","PeriodicalId":42966,"journal":{"name":"International Organizations Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Organizations Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-2020024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The International Health Regulations (ihr), of which the World Health Organization is custodian, govern how countries collectively promote global health security, including prevention, detection, and response to potential global health emergencies such as the ongoing covid-19 pandemic. While Article 44 of this binding legal instrument requires countries to collaborate and assist each other in meeting their respective obligations, recent events demonstrate that the precise nature and scope of these legal obligations are ill-understood. A shared understanding of the level and type of collaboration legally required by the ihr is a necessary step in ensuring these obligations can be acted upon and fully realized, and in fostering global solidarity and resilience in the face of future pandemics. In this consensus statement, public international law scholars specializing in global health consider the legal meaning of Article 44 using the interpretive framework of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于合作和协助应对流行病的国际法律义务的斯泰伦博斯共识
由世界卫生组织管理的《国际卫生条例》规定了各国如何共同促进全球卫生安全,包括预防、发现和应对潜在的全球卫生突发事件,如正在发生的covid-19大流行。虽然这项具有约束力的法律文书第44条要求各国在履行各自义务方面相互合作和协助,但最近的事件表明,人们对这些法律义务的确切性质和范围并不了解。对《国际卫生条例》法律要求的协作水平和类型的共同理解,是确保能够履行和充分履行这些义务,以及在面对未来大流行病时促进全球团结和复原力的必要步骤。在这份协商一致声明中,专门研究全球卫生问题的国际公法学者利用《维也纳条约法公约》的解释框架审议了第44条的法律含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: After the Second World War in particular, the law of international organizations developed as a discipline within public international law. Separate, but not separable. The International Organizations Law Review purports to function as a discussion forum for academics and practitioners active in the field of the law of international organizations. It is based on two pillars; one is based in the world of scholarship, the other in the world of practice. In the first dimension, the Journal focuses on general developments in international institutional law.
期刊最新文献
Constructing African Union Law and Rethinking Supranationalism in African Integration: What Lessons from the European Union? The Freedom of Association as Seen by the International Administrative Tribunals Positive Duties of the Security Council Under the UN Charter and International Law Forty Years of Cooperation in South Asia: A Legal Appraisal of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (saarc) The Nordic Investment Bank: The Evolution of an International Institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1