‘Northern Ireland and the Economic Consequences of Brexit: taking back control or perpetuating underperformance?’

IF 2.1 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Contemporary Social Science Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.1080/21582041.2023.2190157
Graham Brownlow
{"title":"‘Northern Ireland and the Economic Consequences of Brexit: taking back control or perpetuating underperformance?’","authors":"Graham Brownlow","doi":"10.1080/21582041.2023.2190157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper investigates the economic implications of Brexit by making recourse to original archival studies as well as the literatures concerning modern British and European economic history as well as the Two Irelands. An overriding lesson is that Northern Ireland, like the UK as whole, has suffered from weaknesses in competition and productivity that have given rise to long-run economic underperformance. Only after Brentry was this legislation reversed. Yet while European integration overall tended to improve economic performance, political instability tended to offset these benefits. Despite the political settlement in 1998, much room for improvement remains. Brexit, and in particular the Protocol, has complicated matters further. While the Windsor Framework offers greater economic opportunities than the original Protocol, seising these opportunities is far from inevitable. A better regional industrial policy is possible if the right lessons emerge from the historical evidence. Such a regional policy requires consideration of 'place-based' issues and in turn consideration of such issues return us to the importance of historical factors in determining long-run economic performance. Economic history matters more than is often understood.","PeriodicalId":46484,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Social Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"168 - 184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2023.2190157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the economic implications of Brexit by making recourse to original archival studies as well as the literatures concerning modern British and European economic history as well as the Two Irelands. An overriding lesson is that Northern Ireland, like the UK as whole, has suffered from weaknesses in competition and productivity that have given rise to long-run economic underperformance. Only after Brentry was this legislation reversed. Yet while European integration overall tended to improve economic performance, political instability tended to offset these benefits. Despite the political settlement in 1998, much room for improvement remains. Brexit, and in particular the Protocol, has complicated matters further. While the Windsor Framework offers greater economic opportunities than the original Protocol, seising these opportunities is far from inevitable. A better regional industrial policy is possible if the right lessons emerge from the historical evidence. Such a regional policy requires consideration of 'place-based' issues and in turn consideration of such issues return us to the importance of historical factors in determining long-run economic performance. Economic history matters more than is often understood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《北爱尔兰和英国脱欧的经济后果:收回控制权还是继续表现不佳?》”
摘要本文通过查阅原始档案研究以及有关英国和欧洲现代经济史以及两个爱尔兰的文献,探讨英国脱欧的经济影响。一个最重要的教训是,北爱尔兰和整个英国一样,在竞争和生产力方面都存在弱点,导致长期经济表现不佳。这项立法是在布伦垂之后才被推翻的。然而,尽管欧洲一体化总体上倾向于改善经济表现,但政治不稳定往往抵消了这些好处。尽管1998年实现了政治解决,但仍有很大的改进空间。英国脱欧,尤其是《议定书》,使事情更加复杂。虽然《温莎框架》比最初的《议定书》提供了更多的经济机会,但抓住这些机会绝非不可避免。如果从历史证据中得出正确的教训,一个更好的区域产业政策是可能的。这种区域政策需要考虑“基于地方的”问题,而对这些问题的考虑又让我们回到了历史因素在决定长期经济表现方面的重要性。经济史比人们通常理解的更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Social Science
Contemporary Social Science SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Reinventing public transport: rising to the transition challenge Winds from the East: ignored ancient Asian views on international trade and traders A ‘just transition’ for workers in the automotive sector? Survey evidence from the West Midlands Enabling a just transition Exploring opportunities for public sector organisations to connect wellbeing to resource loops in a regional circular economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1