Rejection or Celebration? Autistic Representation in Sitcom Television

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Studies in Social Justice Pub Date : 2022-03-11 DOI:10.26522/ssj.v16i2.2590
Baden Gaeke-Franz
{"title":"Rejection or Celebration? Autistic Representation in Sitcom Television","authors":"Baden Gaeke-Franz","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v16i2.2590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, autistic-coded characters have become a common staple in sitcoms. This paper will examine depictions of autistic-coded characters in two such sitcoms: CBS’s The Big Bang Theory (Big Bang), and NBC’s Community. Sheldon on Big Bang is stereotyped and mistreated by his friends, while Abed on Community challenges stereotypes and is beloved. The different treatment of autistic characters stems from the responses of the shows’ writers to the fear of accidentally misrepresenting autism, with the crew of Big Bang choosing to avoid the label of autism, while Community embraced it and did research to better represent autistic people. This difference has a huge impact on audiences watching the shows. Seeing Sheldon’s friends belittling him because of his autistic-coded traits triggers shame in autistic viewers, while also validating ableist thought patterns in neurotypical viewers. In Community, however, seeing Abed’s confidence in his autistic embodiment serves to boost the confidence of autistic viewers, while his friends’ and classmates’ love and support of him serves as a model for neurotypical viewers of how to best interact with autistic people in the real world. The case of these two shows illustrates two important facts about autistic representation in media: failing to diagnose a character does not exempt a writer from ableist representations, and to avoid this ableism it is important to listen to audience feedback and do research to properly understand the characters from the perspective of the communities they stand for.","PeriodicalId":44923,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Social Justice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v16i2.2590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent years, autistic-coded characters have become a common staple in sitcoms. This paper will examine depictions of autistic-coded characters in two such sitcoms: CBS’s The Big Bang Theory (Big Bang), and NBC’s Community. Sheldon on Big Bang is stereotyped and mistreated by his friends, while Abed on Community challenges stereotypes and is beloved. The different treatment of autistic characters stems from the responses of the shows’ writers to the fear of accidentally misrepresenting autism, with the crew of Big Bang choosing to avoid the label of autism, while Community embraced it and did research to better represent autistic people. This difference has a huge impact on audiences watching the shows. Seeing Sheldon’s friends belittling him because of his autistic-coded traits triggers shame in autistic viewers, while also validating ableist thought patterns in neurotypical viewers. In Community, however, seeing Abed’s confidence in his autistic embodiment serves to boost the confidence of autistic viewers, while his friends’ and classmates’ love and support of him serves as a model for neurotypical viewers of how to best interact with autistic people in the real world. The case of these two shows illustrates two important facts about autistic representation in media: failing to diagnose a character does not exempt a writer from ableist representations, and to avoid this ableism it is important to listen to audience feedback and do research to properly understand the characters from the perspective of the communities they stand for.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拒绝还是庆祝?情景喜剧中的自闭症表现
近年来,患有自闭症的角色已经成为情景喜剧中的常见角色。本文将研究两种情景喜剧中对自闭症编码角色的描述:CBS的《生活大爆炸》和NBC的《社区》。《生活大爆炸》中的谢尔顿被朋友们刻板印象和虐待,而《社区》中的阿布蒂则挑战了刻板印象,受到了人们的喜爱。对自闭症角色的不同对待源于节目作者对不小心误解自闭症的恐惧的反应,《生活大爆炸》的工作人员选择避免自闭症的标签,而《社区》则接受了自闭症的标签,并进行了研究,以更好地代表自闭症患者。这种差异对观看节目的观众产生了巨大影响。看到谢尔登的朋友们因为他的自闭症特征而贬低他,会让自闭症观众产生羞耻感,同时也会让神经正常的观众产生残疾主义者的思维模式。然而,在《社区》中,看到Abed对自己自闭症化身的自信有助于提高自闭症观众的信心,而他的朋友和同学对他的爱和支持为神经正常的观众提供了如何在现实世界中最好地与自闭症患者互动的榜样。这两部剧的案例说明了媒体中自闭症表现的两个重要事实:未能诊断出一个角色并不能免除作家的残疾主义表现,为了避免这种残疾主义,倾听观众的反馈并做研究以正确地从他们所代表的群体的角度理解角色是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Social Justice
Studies in Social Justice POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Super Visa Program: Immigration Policy Changes and Social Injustice under the Neoliberal Governmentality in Canada Infrastructures of Harm, Communities of Knowledge and Environmental Justice Risky Others: Covid-19 Reconstitutions of Risk, Governance, and Stigmatization of Bodies Landscapes of Injustice, Landscapes of Repair (Editor's Introduction) Collective Memories and Community Interventions: Peace Building in Northern Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1