Why do Family Members Reject AI in Health Care? Competing Effects of Emotions

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Management Information Systems Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/07421222.2022.2096550
Eun Hee Park, K. Werder, Lan Cao, B. Ramesh
{"title":"Why do Family Members Reject AI in Health Care? Competing Effects of Emotions","authors":"Eun Hee Park, K. Werder, Lan Cao, B. Ramesh","doi":"10.1080/07421222.2022.2096550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) enables continuous monitoring of patients’ health, thus improving the quality of their health care. However, prior studies suggest that individuals resist such innovative technology. In contrast to prior studies that investigate individuals’ decisions for themselves, we focus on family members’ rejection of AI monitoring, as family members play a significant role in health care decisions. Our research investigates competing effects of emotions toward the rejection of AI monitoring for health care. Based on two scenario-based experiments, our study reveals that emotions play a decisive role in family members’ decision making on behalf of their parents. We find that anxiety about health care monitoring and anxiety about health outcomes reduce the rejection of AI monitoring, whereas surveillance anxiety and delegation anxiety increase rejection. We also find that for individual-level risks, perceived controllability moderates the relationship between surveillance anxiety and the rejection of AI monitoring. We contribute to the theory of Information System rejection by identifying the competing roles of emotions in AI monitoring decision making. We extend the literature on decision making for others by suggesting the influential role of anxiety. We also contribute to healthcare research in Information System by identifying the important role of controllability, a design factor, in AI monitoring rejection.","PeriodicalId":50154,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Information Systems","volume":"39 1","pages":"765 - 792"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2022.2096550","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) enables continuous monitoring of patients’ health, thus improving the quality of their health care. However, prior studies suggest that individuals resist such innovative technology. In contrast to prior studies that investigate individuals’ decisions for themselves, we focus on family members’ rejection of AI monitoring, as family members play a significant role in health care decisions. Our research investigates competing effects of emotions toward the rejection of AI monitoring for health care. Based on two scenario-based experiments, our study reveals that emotions play a decisive role in family members’ decision making on behalf of their parents. We find that anxiety about health care monitoring and anxiety about health outcomes reduce the rejection of AI monitoring, whereas surveillance anxiety and delegation anxiety increase rejection. We also find that for individual-level risks, perceived controllability moderates the relationship between surveillance anxiety and the rejection of AI monitoring. We contribute to the theory of Information System rejection by identifying the competing roles of emotions in AI monitoring decision making. We extend the literature on decision making for others by suggesting the influential role of anxiety. We also contribute to healthcare research in Information System by identifying the important role of controllability, a design factor, in AI monitoring rejection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么家庭成员拒绝医疗保健中的人工智能?情绪的竞争效应
人工智能(AI)能够持续监测患者的健康状况,从而提高他们的医疗保健质量。然而,先前的研究表明,个人抵制这种创新技术。与之前调查个人自己决定的研究相反,我们关注的是家庭成员对人工智能监测的拒绝,因为家庭成员在医疗保健决策中发挥着重要作用。我们的研究调查了情绪对拒绝人工智能监测医疗保健的竞争影响。基于两个基于场景的实验,我们的研究揭示了情绪在家庭成员代表父母的决策中起决定性作用。我们发现,对医疗保健监测的焦虑和对健康结果的焦虑降低了对人工智能监测的排斥,而监测焦虑和委托焦虑则增加了对人工智能监测的排斥。我们还发现,对于个人层面的风险,感知可控性调节了监控焦虑与拒绝人工智能监控之间的关系。我们通过识别情绪在人工智能监控决策中的竞争角色,为信息系统拒绝理论做出了贡献。我们通过提出焦虑的影响作用来扩展关于他人决策的文献。我们还通过识别可控性(设计因素)在人工智能监测拒绝中的重要作用,为信息系统中的医疗保健研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Management Information Systems
Journal of Management Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Management Information Systems is a widely recognized forum for the presentation of research that advances the practice and understanding of organizational information systems. It serves those investigating new modes of information delivery and the changing landscape of information policy making, as well as practitioners and executives managing the information resource.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Vulnerability Prioritization in Cloud Computing Using Multi-View Representation Learning Creating and Capturing Value with Physical-Digital Experiential Consumer Offerings Unintended Consequences of Disclosing Recommendations by Artificial Intelligence versus Humans on True and Fake News Believability and Engagement Board Interlocks with Information Technology Firms and Innovation Outcomes: A Resource Dependence Perspective Engagement and Crowding-Out Effects of Leaderboard Gamification on Medical Crowdfunding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1