Cognitive survey of telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation among emergency personnel

Junhong Wang, K. Zheng, Xiaodan Li, Q. Ma, Jinjun Zhang
{"title":"Cognitive survey of telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation among emergency personnel","authors":"Junhong Wang, K. Zheng, Xiaodan Li, Q. Ma, Jinjun Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2020.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives \nTo investigate the cognition of dispatcher-initiated telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (TCPR) among emergency medical system(EMS) personnel and compare the cognition of TCPR among EMS personnel in different economic status, and to understand the current situation of TCPR cognition of EMS personnel in China. \n \n \nMethods \nThis study is a multicenter cross-sectional survey. The method of multi-level convenient sampling was adopted, and the test reliability and split half reliability of the questionnaire was tested. Questionnaire survey and data collection were conducted from December 2018 to June 2019. The ethical approval number is M2018264. SPSS 20.0 was used for analysis. χ2 test was used to analyze the differences between groups. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 1 191 electronic questionnaires were collected. Of them, 80.94% respondents knew TCPR, 97.82% respondents thought that TCPR should be implemented in cardiac arrest, 36.62% respondents thought that bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality monitoring was needed in TCPR, and TCPR training courses were set up in the emergency department which recruited 25.83% respondents. Emergency personnel in developed areas had a better understanding of the criteria for judging patients' breathlessness (11.69% vs 7.89%, P=0.048), of TCPR need ncluding guidance of chest compression (92.45% vs 87.49%, P=0.012) and of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) quality monitoring including the frequency of artificial respiration (84.42% vs 74.87%, P=0.029) than those in underdeveloped areas, but there was no significant difference in other indicators (P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nTCPR knowledge of EMS personnel in China is unsatisfactory. Further training is needed to improve their understanding of the criteria for judging cardiac arrest in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients via telephone, TCPR content and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality monitoring. There is difference in TCPR knowledge between the EMS personnel in developed and undeveloped areas in China. \n \n \nKey words: \nEmergency medical services; Telephone guidance; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Bystander; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Cognition; Economic status; Cross-sectional survey","PeriodicalId":9981,"journal":{"name":"中华急诊医学杂志","volume":"29 1","pages":"49-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华急诊医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2020.01.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the cognition of dispatcher-initiated telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (TCPR) among emergency medical system(EMS) personnel and compare the cognition of TCPR among EMS personnel in different economic status, and to understand the current situation of TCPR cognition of EMS personnel in China. Methods This study is a multicenter cross-sectional survey. The method of multi-level convenient sampling was adopted, and the test reliability and split half reliability of the questionnaire was tested. Questionnaire survey and data collection were conducted from December 2018 to June 2019. The ethical approval number is M2018264. SPSS 20.0 was used for analysis. χ2 test was used to analyze the differences between groups. Results A total of 1 191 electronic questionnaires were collected. Of them, 80.94% respondents knew TCPR, 97.82% respondents thought that TCPR should be implemented in cardiac arrest, 36.62% respondents thought that bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality monitoring was needed in TCPR, and TCPR training courses were set up in the emergency department which recruited 25.83% respondents. Emergency personnel in developed areas had a better understanding of the criteria for judging patients' breathlessness (11.69% vs 7.89%, P=0.048), of TCPR need ncluding guidance of chest compression (92.45% vs 87.49%, P=0.012) and of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) quality monitoring including the frequency of artificial respiration (84.42% vs 74.87%, P=0.029) than those in underdeveloped areas, but there was no significant difference in other indicators (P>0.05). Conclusions TCPR knowledge of EMS personnel in China is unsatisfactory. Further training is needed to improve their understanding of the criteria for judging cardiac arrest in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients via telephone, TCPR content and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality monitoring. There is difference in TCPR knowledge between the EMS personnel in developed and undeveloped areas in China. Key words: Emergency medical services; Telephone guidance; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Bystander; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Cognition; Economic status; Cross-sectional survey
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急救人员电话心肺复苏认知调查
目的了解急救医疗系统(EMS)工作人员对调度员电话心肺复苏(TCPR)的认知情况,比较不同经济状况下EMS工作人员对TCPR的认知,了解我国EMS工作人员TCPR认知现状。方法本研究为多中心横断面调查。采用多层次方便抽样的方法,对问卷的测试信度和分半信度进行了检验。问卷调查和数据收集于2018年12月至2019年6月进行。伦理批准号为M2018264。采用SPSS 20.0进行分析。采用χ2检验分析各组间的差异。结果共收集电子问卷1191份。其中,80.94%的受访者知道TCPR,97.82%的受访者认为心脏骤停时应实施TCPR,36.62%的受访者认为TCPR中需要旁观者心肺复苏质量监测,急诊科开设了TCPR培训课程,招募了25.83%的受访者。发达地区的急救人员对判断患者呼吸困难的标准有更好的理解(11.69%对7.89%,P=0.048),TCPR需要包括胸部按压指导(92.45%vs.87.49%,P=0.012)和旁观者心肺复苏(BCPR)质量监测(包括人工呼吸频率)(84.42%vs.74.87%,P=0.029)的比率高于欠发达地区,但其他指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。需要进一步培训,以提高他们对通过电话、TCPR内容和旁观者心肺复苏质量监测判断院外心脏骤停患者心脏骤停的标准的理解。我国经济发达地区和欠发达地区EMS人员在TCPR知识方面存在差异。关键词:紧急医疗服务;电话指导;心肺复苏;旁观者;院外心脏骤停;认知;经济状况;横断面调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华急诊医学杂志
中华急诊医学杂志 Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8629
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine is the only national journal which represents the development of emergency medicine in China. The journal is supervised by China Association of Science and Technology, sponsored by Chinese Medical Association, and co-sponsored by Zhejiang University. The journal publishes original research articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in emergency medicine. The columns include Pre-Hospital Rescue, Emergency Care, Trauma, Resuscitation, Poisoning, Disaster Medicine, Continuing Education, etc. It has a wide coverage in China, and builds up communication with Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and international emergency medicine circles.
期刊最新文献
The value of ROX index in evaluating the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients with COVID-19 The prognosis evaluation of sICAM-1, KL-6 combined with EVLWI in severe pneumonia patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome Analysis of clinical features of 58 patients with severe or critical 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia Construction of 5G intelligent medical service system in novel coronavirus pneumonia prevention and control/ 中华急诊医学杂志 Pediatric Airway Foreign Body Retrieval During the Prevention and Control of 2019 Novel Coronavirus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1