Risk-taking by banks: evidence from European Union countries

IF 9 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE China Finance Review International Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1108/cfri-12-2022-0248
M. T. M. Garcia, Ana Jin Ye
{"title":"Risk-taking by banks: evidence from European Union countries","authors":"M. T. M. Garcia, Ana Jin Ye","doi":"10.1108/cfri-12-2022-0248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe aim of this paper is to study the relationship between banks' ownership structure and their risk-taking behavior as well as the impact of banking regulation on banks' approach to taking risk, after the 2008 financial crisis.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical analysis considers a sample of listed banks from European Union (EU) countries, over the period of 2011–2016 and uses the generalized least squared (GLS) random effect (RE) method, following Baltagi and Wu (1999) and Pathan (2009).FindingsThe authors find that the structure of the board of directors can influence bank risk behavior but not the ownership concentration. No significant relation was found between the influence of the regulatory environment and bank risk, i.e., stricter regulation has no effect on risk taking by banks.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to the literature in risk measures and banks' corporate governance. It also considers the impact of regulatory framework on banks' risk-taking behavior. The aim of this empirical analysis was to examine in greater detail these subjects and the dynamics between them after the significant structural changes in the macroeconomic environment and in the financial system, particularly with regards the regulatory and supervisory framework following the 2008 financial crisis, using data from European Union countries.","PeriodicalId":44440,"journal":{"name":"China Finance Review International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Finance Review International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cfri-12-2022-0248","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to study the relationship between banks' ownership structure and their risk-taking behavior as well as the impact of banking regulation on banks' approach to taking risk, after the 2008 financial crisis.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical analysis considers a sample of listed banks from European Union (EU) countries, over the period of 2011–2016 and uses the generalized least squared (GLS) random effect (RE) method, following Baltagi and Wu (1999) and Pathan (2009).FindingsThe authors find that the structure of the board of directors can influence bank risk behavior but not the ownership concentration. No significant relation was found between the influence of the regulatory environment and bank risk, i.e., stricter regulation has no effect on risk taking by banks.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to the literature in risk measures and banks' corporate governance. It also considers the impact of regulatory framework on banks' risk-taking behavior. The aim of this empirical analysis was to examine in greater detail these subjects and the dynamics between them after the significant structural changes in the macroeconomic environment and in the financial system, particularly with regards the regulatory and supervisory framework following the 2008 financial crisis, using data from European Union countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行的风险承担:来自欧盟国家的证据
本文旨在研究2008年金融危机后银行股权结构与风险承担行为之间的关系,以及银行监管对银行风险承担方式的影响。实证分析以2011-2016年期间欧盟(EU)国家的上市银行为样本,采用广义最小二乘(GLS)随机效应(RE)方法,遵循Baltagi和Wu(1999)和Pathan(2009)。研究发现,董事会结构对银行风险行为有影响,但对股权集中度没有影响。监管环境的影响与银行风险之间没有显著的关系,即更严格的监管对银行的风险承担没有影响。本文对风险度量和银行公司治理方面的文献有贡献。本文还考虑了监管框架对银行风险承担行为的影响。本实证分析的目的是使用来自欧盟国家的数据,在宏观经济环境和金融体系发生重大结构性变化之后,特别是在2008年金融危机之后的监管框架方面,更详细地研究这些主题以及它们之间的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: China Finance Review International publishes original and high-quality theoretical and empirical articles focusing on financial and economic issues arising from China's reform, opening-up, economic development, and system transformation. The journal serves as a platform for exchange between Chinese finance scholars and international financial economists, covering a wide range of topics including monetary policy, banking, international trade and finance, corporate finance, asset pricing, market microstructure, corporate governance, incentive studies, fiscal policy, public management, and state-owned enterprise reform.
期刊最新文献
The valuation demand for accounting conservatism: evidence from firm-level climate risk measures Who gains favor with green investors amidst climate risk? Do green economy stocks matter for the carbon and energy markets? Evidence of connectedness effects and hedging strategies Exploring interconnections and risk evaluation of green equities and bonds: fresh perspectives from TVP-VAR model and wavelet-based VaR analysis Unraveling the relationship between sustainability and returns: a multi-attribute utility analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1