The impact of weak environmental steering flow on tropical cyclone track predictability

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Pub Date : 2021-09-23 DOI:10.1002/qj.4171
J. Ashcroft, J. Schwendike, S. Griffiths, A. Ross, C. Short
{"title":"The impact of weak environmental steering flow on tropical cyclone track predictability","authors":"J. Ashcroft, J. Schwendike, S. Griffiths, A. Ross, C. Short","doi":"10.1002/qj.4171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Typhoons Haiyan (2013) and Hagupit (2014) are examples of two tropical cyclones (TCs) for which, despite similarities in the track and intensity, the predictabilities differed greatly. Both TCs made landfall over the Philippines having followed a similar track across the Pacific and both reached intensities in excess of 60 m · s−1. Operational global ensemble forecasts showed large uncertainty in the track of Hagupit , whereas the ensemble spread for Haiyan was considerably less. Using the Met Office's Unified Model, 5‐day global ensemble forecasts were produced for both storms. Consistent with the operational forecasts produced at the time of the storms, the spread of tracks is greater in the forecasts produced for Hagupit than Haiyan . The latter was located on the southern periphery of the subtropical high and embedded in a strong easterly flow. In contrast, the position of Hagupit between two anticyclones earlier in the forecast is key to the subsequent motion of the storm in determining whether Hagupit would make landfall over the Philippines or turn to the north. Upper‐level winds contributed the most to the depth‐averaged steering flow. Statistically significant differences in the strength of the upper‐level anticyclone to the east of the storm, the strength and position of the upper‐level ridge downstream of the storm and the location of a detached potential vorticity (PV) streamer appear between two groups of ensemble members – those which turn to the north and those which make landfall. Positional differences of the TC in different ensemble members earlier in the forecasts, particularly in the east to west direction, are correlated to larger northeast to southwest position differences later in the forecast. Ensemble sensitivity analysis suggests that this initial east–west positional variance is linked to the upper‐level geopotential height directly south of the storm. Accurately representing both the steering flow and the position of Hagupit is vital for an accurate forecast.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":"147 1","pages":"4122 - 4142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Typhoons Haiyan (2013) and Hagupit (2014) are examples of two tropical cyclones (TCs) for which, despite similarities in the track and intensity, the predictabilities differed greatly. Both TCs made landfall over the Philippines having followed a similar track across the Pacific and both reached intensities in excess of 60 m · s−1. Operational global ensemble forecasts showed large uncertainty in the track of Hagupit , whereas the ensemble spread for Haiyan was considerably less. Using the Met Office's Unified Model, 5‐day global ensemble forecasts were produced for both storms. Consistent with the operational forecasts produced at the time of the storms, the spread of tracks is greater in the forecasts produced for Hagupit than Haiyan . The latter was located on the southern periphery of the subtropical high and embedded in a strong easterly flow. In contrast, the position of Hagupit between two anticyclones earlier in the forecast is key to the subsequent motion of the storm in determining whether Hagupit would make landfall over the Philippines or turn to the north. Upper‐level winds contributed the most to the depth‐averaged steering flow. Statistically significant differences in the strength of the upper‐level anticyclone to the east of the storm, the strength and position of the upper‐level ridge downstream of the storm and the location of a detached potential vorticity (PV) streamer appear between two groups of ensemble members – those which turn to the north and those which make landfall. Positional differences of the TC in different ensemble members earlier in the forecasts, particularly in the east to west direction, are correlated to larger northeast to southwest position differences later in the forecast. Ensemble sensitivity analysis suggests that this initial east–west positional variance is linked to the upper‐level geopotential height directly south of the storm. Accurately representing both the steering flow and the position of Hagupit is vital for an accurate forecast.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弱环境转向流对热带气旋路径可预测性的影响
台风海燕(2013)和黑格比(2014)是两个热带气旋的例子,尽管其路径和强度相似,但可预测性差异很大。这两次TC都是在太平洋上空以类似的路径登陆菲律宾的,强度都超过60 m·s−1。运行的全球系综预测显示,黑格比的轨迹存在很大的不确定性,而海燕的系综传播要小得多。使用英国气象局的统一模型,对这两次风暴进行了为期5天的全球综合预报。与风暴发生时的运行预测一致,黑格比的轨迹分布比海燕的轨迹分布更大。后者位于副热带高压的南部边缘,并嵌入一股强烈的东风流中。相比之下,在预测的早些时候,黑格比在两个反气旋之间的位置是风暴后续运动的关键,决定了黑格比是会在菲律宾上空登陆还是转向北方。上层风对深度平均转向流的贡献最大。风暴以东的上层反气旋强度、风暴下游上层脊的强度和位置以及分离位涡(PV)流的位置在两组系综成员之间出现了统计上的显著差异,这两组系统成员分别是转向北方的和登陆的。在预测早期,不同系综成员中TC的位置差异,特别是在东西方向,与预测后期较大的东北-西南位置差异相关。集合灵敏度分析表明,这种初始的东西位置变化与风暴正南方的高层位势高度有关。准确表示黑格比的转向流量和位置对于准确预测至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
期刊最新文献
Multivariate post‐processing of probabilistic sub‐seasonal weather regime forecasts Relationship between vertical variation of cloud microphysical properties and thickness of the entrainment interfacial layer in Physics of Stratocumulus Top stratocumulus clouds Characteristics and trends of Atlantic tropical cyclones that do and do not develop from African easterly waves Teleconnection and the Antarctic response to the Indian Ocean Dipole in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models First trial for the assimilation of radiance data from MTVZA‐GY on board the new Russian satellite meteor‐M N2‐2 in the CMA‐GFS 4D‐VAR system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1