Distantial Ways of Knowing: Doug Blomberg’s Proposal for a Reformational Epistemology

Q2 Arts and Humanities Philosophia Reformata Pub Date : 2019-04-08 DOI:10.1163/23528230-08401073
L. Zuidervaart
{"title":"Distantial Ways of Knowing: Doug Blomberg’s Proposal for a Reformational Epistemology","authors":"L. Zuidervaart","doi":"10.1163/23528230-08401073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the Reformational epistemology proposed by Australian philosopher and educator Doug Blomberg in 1978. After locating his work in a tradition of holistic pluralism with regard to knowledge, I introduce the notion of distantial knowing, Blomberg’s key innovation. Blomberg uses this notion to identify and describe multiple ways of acquiring normative insight, ways that are not theoretical but do open up concrete experience. Although in agreement with Blomberg’s emphasis on the integrality and multidimensionality of knowledge, I raise questions about the role of analytic or logical knowing, the sociocultural mediation of experience, and the contributions of cultural practices and social institutions to knowledge acquisition. I return to these questions in a companion article on the social domains of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":38515,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia Reformata","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23528230-08401073","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia Reformata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23528230-08401073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay explores the Reformational epistemology proposed by Australian philosopher and educator Doug Blomberg in 1978. After locating his work in a tradition of holistic pluralism with regard to knowledge, I introduce the notion of distantial knowing, Blomberg’s key innovation. Blomberg uses this notion to identify and describe multiple ways of acquiring normative insight, ways that are not theoretical but do open up concrete experience. Although in agreement with Blomberg’s emphasis on the integrality and multidimensionality of knowledge, I raise questions about the role of analytic or logical knowing, the sociocultural mediation of experience, and the contributions of cultural practices and social institutions to knowledge acquisition. I return to these questions in a companion article on the social domains of knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认识的遥远方式:道格·布隆伯格的改革认识论建议
本文探讨了澳大利亚哲学家、教育家道格·布隆伯格于1978年提出的改革认识论。在将布隆伯格的作品定位于关于知识的整体多元主义传统之后,我介绍了远知的概念,这是布隆伯格的关键创新。布隆伯格用这个概念来识别和描述获取规范性洞察力的多种方式,这些方式不是理论的,但确实能带来具体的经验。虽然我同意布隆伯格对知识的整体性和多维性的强调,但我对分析性或逻辑性知识的作用、经验的社会文化中介以及文化实践和社会制度对知识获取的贡献提出了质疑。我将在一篇关于社会知识领域的配套文章中回到这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophia Reformata
Philosophia Reformata Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Zuidervaart and Dooyeweerd: A Critical Retrieval? A Review Essay of Shattering Silos: Reimagining Knowledge, Politics, and Social Critique by Lambert Zuidervaart Navigating Post modern Theology: Insights from Jean-Luc Marion and Gianni Vattimo’s Philosophy, written by Michael J. McGravey Neurowaves: Brain, Time, and Consciousness, written by Georg Northoff Dancing in the Wild Spaces of Love: A Theopoetics of Gift and Call, Risk and Promise, written by James H. Olthuis Het onbehagen van juf Ank: Over veiligheid en vertrouwen in roerige tijden, written by Ronald van Steden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1