Need adapted use of medication in the open dialogue approach for psychosis: a descriptive longitudinal cohort study

Tomi Bergström, Jaakko Seikkula, P. Köngäs-Saviaro, Jyri J. Taskila, J. Aaltonen
{"title":"Need adapted use of medication in the open dialogue approach for psychosis: a descriptive longitudinal cohort study","authors":"Tomi Bergström, Jaakko Seikkula, P. Köngäs-Saviaro, Jyri J. Taskila, J. Aaltonen","doi":"10.1080/17522439.2022.2134444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background The open dialogue (OD) approach includes the need-adapted use of psychiatric medication in treating first-episode psychosis (FEP), but there is limited information on how psychiatric medications are actually used in OD-based services. This study aims to analyse long-term medication dispensing patterns among FEP cohort treated according to the OD. Methods The OD cohort consisted of people who received treatment for FEP in the Finnish Western Lapland catchment area at a time of OD implementation (n=61). The comparison group included people whose FEP treatment commenced outside the catchment area during the mid-1990s (n=1378). Data were gathered from national registers from onset to the end of the 10-year follow-up or death. A non-confirmatory descriptive comparison was performed to evaluate the usage patterns and cumulative exposure to psychiatric medication. Results Under OD, a smaller proportion had been dispensed benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and neuroleptics. Persons who had received these medications did not differ in cumulative exposure. In both groups, most of those who received neuroleptics in the first follow-up years continued using medication throughout follow-up. Discussion OD may assist in detecting FEP patients who can manage without neuroleptics, thus minimizing iatrogenic effects. Due to the observational design, further studies are required to confirm this hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":46344,"journal":{"name":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","volume":"15 1","pages":"134 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2022.2134444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The open dialogue (OD) approach includes the need-adapted use of psychiatric medication in treating first-episode psychosis (FEP), but there is limited information on how psychiatric medications are actually used in OD-based services. This study aims to analyse long-term medication dispensing patterns among FEP cohort treated according to the OD. Methods The OD cohort consisted of people who received treatment for FEP in the Finnish Western Lapland catchment area at a time of OD implementation (n=61). The comparison group included people whose FEP treatment commenced outside the catchment area during the mid-1990s (n=1378). Data were gathered from national registers from onset to the end of the 10-year follow-up or death. A non-confirmatory descriptive comparison was performed to evaluate the usage patterns and cumulative exposure to psychiatric medication. Results Under OD, a smaller proportion had been dispensed benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and neuroleptics. Persons who had received these medications did not differ in cumulative exposure. In both groups, most of those who received neuroleptics in the first follow-up years continued using medication throughout follow-up. Discussion OD may assist in detecting FEP patients who can manage without neuroleptics, thus minimizing iatrogenic effects. Due to the observational design, further studies are required to confirm this hypothesis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需要适应使用药物的公开对话方法精神病:一项描述性纵向队列研究
摘要背景开放对话(OD)方法包括在治疗首发精神病(FEP)时使用适应需要的精神药物,但关于精神药物如何在基于OD的服务中实际使用的信息有限。本研究旨在分析根据OD治疗的FEP队列的长期药物分配模式。方法OD队列包括在实施OD时在芬兰西拉普兰流域接受FEP治疗的人(n=61)。对照组包括1990年代中期在集水区外开始FEP治疗的人(n=1378)。从发病到10年随访或死亡结束,从国家登记册中收集数据。进行了一项非验证性描述性比较,以评估精神药物的使用模式和累积暴露量。结果在OD下,较小比例的患者服用了苯二氮卓类药物、抗抑郁药和抗精神病药物。接受过这些药物治疗的人在累积暴露量方面没有差异。在这两组患者中,大多数在第一个随访年份接受了抗精神病药物治疗的患者在整个随访期间继续使用药物。讨论OD可能有助于检测FEP患者,他们可以在不使用神经抑制剂的情况下进行治疗,从而最大限度地减少医源性影响。由于观测设计,需要进一步的研究来证实这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
A mixed-methods validation of the 15-item English version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) in an adult mental health inpatient rehabilitation setting Exploring service users’ and practitioners’ priorities regarding outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy for distressing voices: a thematic analysis The association between social identity and paranoia through the mediators of trust and hostile attribution bias in a UK general population study Exploring personal accounts of the facilitators and barriers to seeking help for first-episode psychosis (FEP): a meta-ethnography A book review of Crash: a memoir of overmedication and recovery A book review of Crash: a memoir of overmedication and recovery , by Ann Bracken, Simpsonville, MD, Charing Cross Press, 2023, 227 pp., $18.00 (paperback), ISBN: 978057839433-6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1