R. Sokol, Anna E. Austin, Caroline E. Chandler, E. Byrum, Jessica Bousquette, Christiana Lancaster, G. Doss, Andrea Dotson, Venera Urbaeva, Bhavna Singichetti, Kanisha C. Brevard, S. Wright, P. Lanier, M. Shanahan
{"title":"Screening Children for Social Determinants of Health: A Systematic Review","authors":"R. Sokol, Anna E. Austin, Caroline E. Chandler, E. Byrum, Jessica Bousquette, Christiana Lancaster, G. Doss, Andrea Dotson, Venera Urbaeva, Bhavna Singichetti, Kanisha C. Brevard, S. Wright, P. Lanier, M. Shanahan","doi":"10.1542/peds.2019-1622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this systematic review, we catalog SDOH screening tools used among children and evaluate how the tools detect early indicators of risk and inform care. CONTEXT: Screening children for social determinants of health (SDOHs) has gained attention in recent years, but there is a deficit in understanding the present state of the science. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review SDOH screening tools used with children, examine their psychometric properties, and evaluate how they detect early indicators of risk and inform care. DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. STUDY SELECTION: Studies in which a tool that screened children for multiple SDOHs (defined according to Healthy People 2020) was developed, tested, and/or employed. DATA EXTRACTION: Extraction domains included study characteristics, screening tool characteristics, SDOHs screened, and follow-up procedures. RESULTS: The search returned 6274 studies. We retained 17 studies encompassing 11 screeners. Study samples were diverse with respect to biological sex and race and/or ethnicity. Screening was primarily conducted in clinical settings with a parent or caregiver being the primary informant for all screeners. Psychometric properties were assessed for only 3 screeners. The most common SDOH domains screened included the family context and economic stability. Authors of the majority of studies described referrals and/or interventions that followed screening to address identified SDOHs. LIMITATIONS: Following the Healthy People 2020 SDOH definition may have excluded articles that other definitions would have captured. CONCLUSIONS: The extent to which SDOH screening accurately assessed a child’s SDOHs was largely unevaluated. Authors of future research should also evaluate if referrals and interventions after the screening effectively address SDOHs and improve child well-being.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1542/peds.2019-1622","citationCount":"133","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 133
Abstract
In this systematic review, we catalog SDOH screening tools used among children and evaluate how the tools detect early indicators of risk and inform care. CONTEXT: Screening children for social determinants of health (SDOHs) has gained attention in recent years, but there is a deficit in understanding the present state of the science. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review SDOH screening tools used with children, examine their psychometric properties, and evaluate how they detect early indicators of risk and inform care. DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. STUDY SELECTION: Studies in which a tool that screened children for multiple SDOHs (defined according to Healthy People 2020) was developed, tested, and/or employed. DATA EXTRACTION: Extraction domains included study characteristics, screening tool characteristics, SDOHs screened, and follow-up procedures. RESULTS: The search returned 6274 studies. We retained 17 studies encompassing 11 screeners. Study samples were diverse with respect to biological sex and race and/or ethnicity. Screening was primarily conducted in clinical settings with a parent or caregiver being the primary informant for all screeners. Psychometric properties were assessed for only 3 screeners. The most common SDOH domains screened included the family context and economic stability. Authors of the majority of studies described referrals and/or interventions that followed screening to address identified SDOHs. LIMITATIONS: Following the Healthy People 2020 SDOH definition may have excluded articles that other definitions would have captured. CONCLUSIONS: The extent to which SDOH screening accurately assessed a child’s SDOHs was largely unevaluated. Authors of future research should also evaluate if referrals and interventions after the screening effectively address SDOHs and improve child well-being.
在这篇系统综述中,我们对儿童中使用的SDOH筛查工具进行了分类,并评估了这些工具如何检测早期风险指标并为护理提供信息。背景:近年来,筛查儿童健康的社会决定因素(SDOHs)引起了人们的关注,但对科学现状的理解还存在不足。目的:系统地回顾用于儿童的SDOH筛查工具,检查其心理测量特性,并评估其如何检测早期风险指标并告知护理。数据来源:PubMed、护理和相关健康文献累积索引、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央登记册和Web of Science核心文献集的综合电子检索。研究选择:开发、测试和/或使用一种筛查儿童多种SDOH的工具(根据《健康人2020》定义)的研究。数据提取:提取领域包括研究特征、筛选工具特征、筛选的SDOH和随访程序。结果:检索返回6274项研究。我们保留了17项研究,包括11名筛选人员。研究样本在生理性别、种族和/或民族方面各不相同。筛查主要在临床环境中进行,父母或护理人员是所有筛查者的主要信息提供者。仅对3名筛查者的心理测量特性进行了评估。筛选出的最常见的SDOH结构域包括家庭背景和经济稳定性。大多数研究的作者描述了筛查后的转诊和/或干预措施,以解决已确定的SDOH。限制:根据《健康人2020》SDOH的定义,可能会排除其他定义可能会涵盖的文章。结论:SDOH筛查准确评估儿童SDOH的程度在很大程度上没有评估。未来研究的作者还应评估筛查后的转诊和干预措施是否能有效解决SDOH并改善儿童福祉。
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.