Theoretical and methodological framework for the analysis of international forest political processes by stakeholders´ perceptions at national level

IF 1.4 Q2 FORESTRY Central European Forestry Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-15 DOI:10.2478/forj-2021-0015
Lenka Halušková, Z. Dobšinská, J. Šálka
{"title":"Theoretical and methodological framework for the analysis of international forest political processes by stakeholders´ perceptions at national level","authors":"Lenka Halušková, Z. Dobšinská, J. Šálka","doi":"10.2478/forj-2021-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Forests cover about 30% of the world´s land area and provide people and nature with essential ecosystem services and goods. Despite their importance, forests continue to be degraded. A variety of international forest governance and policy arrangements have developed to foster protection and sustainability of forests. However, number of studies point to nonexistence of a global forest policy regime per se, and growing institutional fragmentation of forest governance arrangements. In line with continuing priority of national sovereignty in the international regulation of forest policy, the role of domestic policies, mainly domestic forest policy actors, is considered central to international forest governance analysis by many researchers. The paper aimed to set the framework for the international forest policy analysis by domestic forestry stakeholders´ perceptions. The dimensions of Policy Arrangements Approach modified for purpose of meeting the nature of research, serve as theoretical foundations. In the first part, the paper aim to define dimensions theoretically. In the second part, specific international forest-focused political processes are described through adapted dimensions. The two steps serve as the basis for research to be subsequently applied in selected European countries.","PeriodicalId":45042,"journal":{"name":"Central European Forestry Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"230 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Forestry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2021-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Forests cover about 30% of the world´s land area and provide people and nature with essential ecosystem services and goods. Despite their importance, forests continue to be degraded. A variety of international forest governance and policy arrangements have developed to foster protection and sustainability of forests. However, number of studies point to nonexistence of a global forest policy regime per se, and growing institutional fragmentation of forest governance arrangements. In line with continuing priority of national sovereignty in the international regulation of forest policy, the role of domestic policies, mainly domestic forest policy actors, is considered central to international forest governance analysis by many researchers. The paper aimed to set the framework for the international forest policy analysis by domestic forestry stakeholders´ perceptions. The dimensions of Policy Arrangements Approach modified for purpose of meeting the nature of research, serve as theoretical foundations. In the first part, the paper aim to define dimensions theoretically. In the second part, specific international forest-focused political processes are described through adapted dimensions. The two steps serve as the basis for research to be subsequently applied in selected European countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益攸关方在国家一级的看法分析国际森林政治进程的理论和方法框架
森林覆盖了世界上约30%的陆地面积,为人类和自然提供了基本的生态系统服务和产品。森林虽然重要,但仍在退化。已经制定了各种国际森林治理和政策安排,以促进森林的保护和可持续性。然而,一些研究指出,全球森林政策制度本身并不存在,森林管理安排的体制日益分散。由于国家主权在国际森林政策管理中继续处于优先地位,许多研究人员认为,国内政策,主要是国内森林政策行为者的作用是国际森林治理分析的核心。本文旨在根据国内林业利益相关者的看法,为国际森林政策分析建立框架。政策安排方法的维度为符合研究性质而修改,作为理论基础。在第一部分中,本文旨在从理论上定义维度。在第二部分中,通过调整的维度描述了以森林为重点的具体国际政治进程。这两个步骤是随后在选定的欧洲国家应用的研究的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
23
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Central European Forestry Journal (published as Lesnícky Èasopis - Forestry Journal until 2016) publishes novel science originating from research in forestry and related braches. Central European Forestry Journal is a professional peer-reviewed scientific journal published 4-time a year. The journal contains original papers and review papers of basic and applied research from all fields of forestry and related disciplines. The editorial office accepts the manuscripts within the focus of the journal exclusively in English language. The journal does not have article processing charges (APCs) nor article submission charges. Central European Forestry Journal, abbreviation: Cent. Eur. For. J., publishes original papers and review papers of basic and applied research from all fields of forestry and related scientific areas. The journal focuses on forestry issues relevant for Europe, primarily Central European regions. Original works and review papers can be submitted only in English language.
期刊最新文献
The influence of anthropogenic trampling of gray forest soils on their physical properties Inconsistent phenotypic differentiation at physiological traits in Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) provenances under contrasting water regimes Economically optimised target state of uneven-aged forest management for main forest types in Slovakia Trade-offs or complementarity between biomass production and biodiversity in European forests: a review Carbon stock in living biomass of Russian forests: new quantification based on data from the first cycle of the State Forest Inventory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1