{"title":"The Battle of the Widows: La Montálvez versus Clemencia","authors":"Rosalía Cornejo-Parriego","doi":"10.1080/08831157.2023.2224800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Their liminality in a patriarchal society and the cultural apprehensions surrounding widows explain why literature has rarely been sympathetic to them. This has been particularly the case with the seductive ones, the viudas alegres who are perceived as a threat to the social order. With a didactic and ideological purpose in mind, José María de Pereda condemns Madrid’s viudas verdes in La Montálvez (1888), while in Clemencia (1852), Fernán Caballero combats the backlash against widows by creating an impeccable role model and representative of Spain’s periphery. This article reads both novels as counternarratives of widowhood and examines how their authors develop two very different narratives to control and confine female excess –sexual in one case, intellectual in the other– within a conservative gender and national paradigm.","PeriodicalId":41843,"journal":{"name":"ROMANCE QUARTERLY","volume":"70 1","pages":"206 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ROMANCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08831157.2023.2224800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Their liminality in a patriarchal society and the cultural apprehensions surrounding widows explain why literature has rarely been sympathetic to them. This has been particularly the case with the seductive ones, the viudas alegres who are perceived as a threat to the social order. With a didactic and ideological purpose in mind, José María de Pereda condemns Madrid’s viudas verdes in La Montálvez (1888), while in Clemencia (1852), Fernán Caballero combats the backlash against widows by creating an impeccable role model and representative of Spain’s periphery. This article reads both novels as counternarratives of widowhood and examines how their authors develop two very different narratives to control and confine female excess –sexual in one case, intellectual in the other– within a conservative gender and national paradigm.
摘要她们在父权社会中的局限性和对寡妇的文化担忧解释了为什么文学很少同情她们。诱惑者尤其如此,他们被视为对社会秩序的威胁。何塞·马里亚·德·佩雷达(JoséMaría de Pereda)怀着说教和意识形态的目的,谴责马德里在《La Montálvez》(1888年)中的暴行,而在《Clemencia》(1852年)中,费尔南·卡巴列罗(Fernán Caballero)则通过塑造一个无可挑剔的榜样和西班牙周边地区的代表来对抗对寡妇的强烈反对。这篇文章将这两部小说都解读为对守寡的反叙事,并考察了它们的作者是如何在保守的性别和国家范式中发展出两种截然不同的叙事来控制和限制女性的过度——一种是性的,另一种是智识的。
期刊介绍:
Lorca and Baudelaire, Chrétien de Troyes and Borges. The articles in Romance Quarterly provide insight into classic and contemporary works of literature originating in the Romance languages. The journal publishes historical and interpretative articles primarily on French and Spanish literature but also on Catalan, Italian, Portuguese, and Brazilian literature. RQ contains critical essays and book reviews, mostly in English but also in Romance languages, by scholars from universities all over the world. Romance Quarterly belongs in every department and library of Romance languages.