A Hybridization of Machine Learning and NSGA-II for Multi-Objective Optimization of Surface Roughness and Cutting Force in ANSI 4340 Alloy Steel Turning

Q2 Engineering Journal of Machine Engineering Pub Date : 2023-02-03 DOI:10.36897/jme/160172
Anh-Tu Nguyen, Van-Hai Nguyen, Tien-Thinh Le, N. Nguyen
{"title":"A Hybridization of Machine Learning and NSGA-II for Multi-Objective Optimization of Surface Roughness and Cutting Force in ANSI 4340 Alloy Steel Turning","authors":"Anh-Tu Nguyen, Van-Hai Nguyen, Tien-Thinh Le, N. Nguyen","doi":"10.36897/jme/160172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work focuses on optimizing process parameters in turning AISI 4340 alloy steel. A hybridization of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms and a Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) is applied to find the Pareto solution. The objective functions are a simultaneous minimum of average surface roughness (Ra) and cutting force under the cutting parameter constraints of cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut, and tool nose radius in a range of 50–375 m/min, 0.02–0.25 mm/rev, 0.1–1.5 mm, and 0.4–0.8 mm, respectively. The present study uses five ML models – namely SVR, CAT, RFR, GBR, and ANN – to predict Ra and cutting force. Results indicate that ANN offers the best predictive performance in respect of all accuracy metrics: root-mean-squared-error (RMSE), mean-absolute-error (MAE), and coefficient of determination ( R 2 ). In addition, a hybridization of NSGA-II and ANN is implemented to find the optimal solutions for machining parameters, which lie on the Pareto front. The results of this multi-objective optimization indicate that Ra lies in a range between 1.032 and 1.048 µm, and cutting force was found to range between 7.981 and 8.277 kgf for the five selected Pareto solutions. In the set of non-dominated keys, none of the individual solutions is superior to any of the others, so it is the manufacturer's decision which dataset to select. Results summarize the value range in the Pareto solutions generated by NSGA-II: cutting speeds between 72.92 and 75.11 m/min, a feed rate of 0.02 mm/rev, a depth of cut between 0.62 and 0.79 mm, and a tool nose radius of 0.4 mm, are recommended. Following that, experimental validations were finally conducted to verify the optimization procedure.","PeriodicalId":37821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Machine Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Machine Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36897/jme/160172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This work focuses on optimizing process parameters in turning AISI 4340 alloy steel. A hybridization of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms and a Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) is applied to find the Pareto solution. The objective functions are a simultaneous minimum of average surface roughness (Ra) and cutting force under the cutting parameter constraints of cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut, and tool nose radius in a range of 50–375 m/min, 0.02–0.25 mm/rev, 0.1–1.5 mm, and 0.4–0.8 mm, respectively. The present study uses five ML models – namely SVR, CAT, RFR, GBR, and ANN – to predict Ra and cutting force. Results indicate that ANN offers the best predictive performance in respect of all accuracy metrics: root-mean-squared-error (RMSE), mean-absolute-error (MAE), and coefficient of determination ( R 2 ). In addition, a hybridization of NSGA-II and ANN is implemented to find the optimal solutions for machining parameters, which lie on the Pareto front. The results of this multi-objective optimization indicate that Ra lies in a range between 1.032 and 1.048 µm, and cutting force was found to range between 7.981 and 8.277 kgf for the five selected Pareto solutions. In the set of non-dominated keys, none of the individual solutions is superior to any of the others, so it is the manufacturer's decision which dataset to select. Results summarize the value range in the Pareto solutions generated by NSGA-II: cutting speeds between 72.92 and 75.11 m/min, a feed rate of 0.02 mm/rev, a depth of cut between 0.62 and 0.79 mm, and a tool nose radius of 0.4 mm, are recommended. Following that, experimental validations were finally conducted to verify the optimization procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习和NSGA-II的ANSI 4340合金钢车削表面粗糙度和切削力多目标优化
本工作的重点是优化AISI4340合金钢的车削工艺参数。将机器学习(ML)算法和非支配排序遗传算法(NSGA-II)相结合来寻找Pareto解。目标函数是在50–375 m/min、0.02–0.25 mm/rev、0.1–1.5 mm和0.4–0.8 mm的切削参数约束下,平均表面粗糙度(Ra)和切削力的同时最小值。本研究使用五个ML模型——即SVR、CAT、RFR、GBR和ANN——来预测Ra和切削力。结果表明,人工神经网络在所有精度指标方面都具有最佳的预测性能:均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和决定系数(R2)。此外,还实现了NSGA-II和ANN的混合,以找到位于Pareto前沿的加工参数的最优解。该多目标优化的结果表明,对于五个选定的Pareto解,Ra在1.032和1.048µm之间,切削力在7.981和8.277 kgf之间。在一组非支配密钥中,没有一个单独的解决方案优于其他任何解决方案,因此选择哪个数据集是制造商的决定。结果总结了NSGA-II生成的Pareto解的值范围:建议切割速度在72.92至75.11 m/min之间,进给速度为0.02 mm/rev,切割深度在0.62至0.79 mm之间,刀尖半径为0.4 mm。之后,最后进行了实验验证,以验证优化程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Machine Engineering
Journal of Machine Engineering Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: ournal of Machine Engineering is a scientific journal devoted to current issues of design and manufacturing - aided by innovative computer techniques and state-of-the-art computer systems - of products which meet the demands of the current global market. It favours solutions harmonizing with the up-to-date manufacturing strategies, the quality requirements and the needs of design, planning, scheduling and production process management. The Journal'' s subject matter also covers the design and operation of high efficient, precision, process machines. The Journal is a continuator of Machine Engineering Publisher for five years. The Journal appears quarterly, with a circulation of 100 copies, with each issue devoted entirely to a different topic. The papers are carefully selected and reviewed by distinguished world famous scientists and practitioners. The authors of the publications are eminent specialists from all over the world and Poland. Journal of Machine Engineering provides the best assistance to factories and universities. It enables factories to solve their difficult problems and manufacture good products at a low cost and fast rate. It enables educators to update their teaching and scientists to deepen their knowledge and pursue their research in the right direction.
期刊最新文献
Fracture Mechanics-Based Modelling of Tool Wear in Machining Ti6Al4V Considering the Microstructure of Cemented Carbide Tools Fuzzy Logic in Risk Assessment of Production Machines Failure in Forming and Assembly Processes Influence of the Substrate Size on the Cooling Behavior and Properties of the DED-LB Process Automatic Detection of Axes for Turning Parts Enabling Federated Learning Services Using OPC UA, Linked Data and GAIA-X in Cognitive Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1