Case Studies on Acupuncture Principles in Headaches

S. Pradhan, A. Gantenbein, Yi Li, Sebastian Frese, S. Lehmann, F. Angst
{"title":"Case Studies on Acupuncture Principles in Headaches","authors":"S. Pradhan, A. Gantenbein, Yi Li, Sebastian Frese, S. Lehmann, F. Angst","doi":"10.4103/CMAC.CMAC_17_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This observational cohort pilot study aimed to evaluate the effects of the acupuncture methods, Jiu Cang Zhen (JCZ) and Huang Guan (HG), on changes in headache intensity in an inpatient, multimodal Zurzach Headache Programme (ZHP). Methods: Study participants consisted of patients diagnosed with chronic headache disorder (headache ds, 30 days per month) or daily persistent headache. All patients received conventional therapies with active and passive approaches. The patient group was treated with JCZ and HG acupuncture methods, receiving a total of six to eight acupuncture sessions of 50 to 60 minutes each, during a 3–4-week multimodal ZHP at the RehaClinic Bad Zurzach. Pain intensity was quantified using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) before and after each acupuncture therapy session. Results: Ten patients were recruited, six women and four men, with a mean age of 41.7 (standard deviation, [SD] =13.9). A reduction in headache intensity was reported by all patients in each of the sessions. The average NRS for pain was 4.21 (SD = 1.44) before acupuncture and 1.24 (SD = 0.93) after acupuncture (means first by number of sessions, then per n = 10 patients). This resulted in a mean difference of 2.97 (SD = 1.04), corresponding to a standardized response mean of 2.85 (95% confidence interval: 2.11–3.60, one-tailed P < 0.001), meaning there was a large effect. Conclusions: This pilot study shows that JCZ and HG are suitable acupuncture methods for reducing headache intensity in the treatment of headaches. A comparison with the conventional classical acupuncture methods from the acupuncture textbook for traditional Chinese medicine students in China, exploration with a larger patient group, and prolonged monitoring of pain behavior could be foci of follow-up investigations.","PeriodicalId":72584,"journal":{"name":"Chinese medicine and culture : official publication of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"93 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese medicine and culture : official publication of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/CMAC.CMAC_17_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This observational cohort pilot study aimed to evaluate the effects of the acupuncture methods, Jiu Cang Zhen (JCZ) and Huang Guan (HG), on changes in headache intensity in an inpatient, multimodal Zurzach Headache Programme (ZHP). Methods: Study participants consisted of patients diagnosed with chronic headache disorder (headache ds, 30 days per month) or daily persistent headache. All patients received conventional therapies with active and passive approaches. The patient group was treated with JCZ and HG acupuncture methods, receiving a total of six to eight acupuncture sessions of 50 to 60 minutes each, during a 3–4-week multimodal ZHP at the RehaClinic Bad Zurzach. Pain intensity was quantified using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) before and after each acupuncture therapy session. Results: Ten patients were recruited, six women and four men, with a mean age of 41.7 (standard deviation, [SD] =13.9). A reduction in headache intensity was reported by all patients in each of the sessions. The average NRS for pain was 4.21 (SD = 1.44) before acupuncture and 1.24 (SD = 0.93) after acupuncture (means first by number of sessions, then per n = 10 patients). This resulted in a mean difference of 2.97 (SD = 1.04), corresponding to a standardized response mean of 2.85 (95% confidence interval: 2.11–3.60, one-tailed P < 0.001), meaning there was a large effect. Conclusions: This pilot study shows that JCZ and HG are suitable acupuncture methods for reducing headache intensity in the treatment of headaches. A comparison with the conventional classical acupuncture methods from the acupuncture textbook for traditional Chinese medicine students in China, exploration with a larger patient group, and prolonged monitoring of pain behavior could be foci of follow-up investigations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针灸原理治疗头痛的案例研究
目的:本观察性队列试验研究旨在评估针刺方法九仓珍(JCZ)和黄冠(HG)对住院多模式Zurzach头痛方案(ZHP)头痛强度变化的影响。方法:研究参与者包括被诊断为慢性头痛障碍(头痛ds,每月30天)或每日持续头痛的患者。所有患者均接受了主动和被动两种方法的常规治疗。患者组采用JCZ和HG针灸方法进行治疗,在Bad Zurzach康复诊所进行为期3-4周的多模式ZHP,共接受6至8次针灸,每次50至60分钟。在每次针灸治疗前后使用数字评定量表(NRS)对疼痛强度进行量化。结果:招募了10名患者,6名女性和4名男性,平均年龄为41.7岁(标准差,[SD]=13.9)。所有患者在每次治疗中都报告头痛强度降低。针刺前疼痛的平均NRS为4.21(SD=1.44),针刺后疼痛的平均NR为1.24(SD=0.93)(首先是指疗程数,然后是每10名患者)。这导致了2.97的平均差异(SD=1.04),对应于2.85的标准化反应平均值(95%置信区间:2.11–3.60,单尾P<0.001),这意味着存在很大的影响。结论:本初步研究表明,JCZ和HG是降低头痛强度治疗头痛的合适针刺方法。与中国中医学生针灸教材中的传统经典针灸方法进行比较,对更大的患者群体进行探索,并对疼痛行为进行长期监测,这些都可能是后续调查的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nashville Qi? Chinese Medicine in an American Heartland. Research on Chinese Medical History from a Global Perspective: Theory, Method, and Historical Materials Jean-Pierre Abel-Rémusat :Doctor and Sinolgist Personal Experience of Chinese Medical History Food and Drug: A New Direction in the History of Medicine in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1