An Evidence-Based Logic for the Use of Positive Reinforcement: Responses to Typical Criticisms

IF 0.6 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Beyond Behavior Pub Date : 2020-05-17 DOI:10.1177/1074295620917153
Terrance M. Scott, T. Landrum
{"title":"An Evidence-Based Logic for the Use of Positive Reinforcement: Responses to Typical Criticisms","authors":"Terrance M. Scott, T. Landrum","doi":"10.1177/1074295620917153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we provide both a critical analysis of and logical response to a set of the most typical school-based objections to the effective use of positive reinforcement. For example, one objection is that positive reinforcement amounts to bribery. Practitioners are provided with clear and concise arguments refuting each objection and data-informed rationales supporting the school-based use of positive reinforcement.","PeriodicalId":42674,"journal":{"name":"Beyond Behavior","volume":"29 1","pages":"69 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1074295620917153","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyond Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295620917153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this article, we provide both a critical analysis of and logical response to a set of the most typical school-based objections to the effective use of positive reinforcement. For example, one objection is that positive reinforcement amounts to bribery. Practitioners are provided with clear and concise arguments refuting each objection and data-informed rationales supporting the school-based use of positive reinforcement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种使用正强化的基于证据的逻辑:对典型批评的回应
在这篇文章中,我们对一组最典型的基于学校的反对意见进行了批判性分析,并对其做出了合乎逻辑的回应。例如,一种反对意见是,正强化相当于贿赂。为从业者提供了清晰简洁的论据来反驳每一种反对意见,并提供了支持在学校使用积极强化的数据依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Beyond Behavior
Beyond Behavior EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Using Visual Activity Schedules to Improve Transitioning for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders De-Escalation With Low-Intensity Antecedent Strategies: Implications for Disproportionate Disciplinary Outcomes There’s a Thin Line Between Numerators and Denominators: Addressing Academic and Behavioral Needs of Students With EBD Using SRSD Fractions Essentials of Writing Pedagogy for Preservice Teachers With Considerations for Those Teaching Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Always Consider Culture: Incorporating Cultural Responsiveness into Functional Communication Training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1