Prehospital Triage of Intracranial Hemorrhage and Anterior Large‐Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: Value of the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1161/svin.123.000947
L. Dekker, V. Geraedts, J. Hubert, Dion Duijndam, Marcel D.J. Durieux, Loes Janssens, W. Moojen, E. V. van Zwet, M. Wermer, N. Kruyt, I. R. Wijngaard
{"title":"Prehospital Triage of Intracranial Hemorrhage and Anterior Large‐Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: Value of the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation","authors":"L. Dekker, V. Geraedts, J. Hubert, Dion Duijndam, Marcel D.J. Durieux, Loes Janssens, W. Moojen, E. V. van Zwet, M. Wermer, N. Kruyt, I. R. Wijngaard","doi":"10.1161/svin.123.000947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) score can identify patients with anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion (aLVO) ischemic stroke for transportation to a comprehensive stroke center for endovascular thrombectomy. However, patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) may also benefit from direct transportation to a comprehensive stroke center for neurosurgical treatment. We aimed to assess if the RACE score can distinguish patients with ICH in addition to aLVO stroke from other patients with suspected stroke.\n \n \n \n We analyzed data from the LPSS (Leiden Prehospital Stroke Study), a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study in 2 Dutch ambulance regions. Ambulance paramedics documented prehospital observations in all patients aged ≥18 years with suspected stroke. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a positive RACE score (≥5 points) for a diagnosis of ICH or aLVO stroke, compared with patients with non‐aLVO stroke, transient ischemic attack, or stroke mimic. In addition, we performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis and calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs).\n \n \n \n \n We included 2004 patients with a stroke code, of whom 149 had an ICH, 153 had an aLVO stroke, 687 had a non‐aLVO stroke, 262 had a transient ischemic attack, and 753 had a stroke mimic. Patients with ICH and aLVO stroke more often had a positive RACE score than other patients with suspected stroke (46.2% and 58.0%, respectively, versus 6.4%;\n P\n <0.01). A positive RACE score had a sensitivity of 52.7%, a specificity of 93.6%, a positive predictive value of 55.4%, and a negative predictive value of 92.9% for a diagnosis of ICH or aLVO stroke. In multivariable analysis, a positive RACE score had the strongest association with ICH or aLVO stroke (adjusted OR, 10.11 [95% CI, 6.84–14.93]).\n \n \n \n \n Our study shows that the RACE score can also identify patients with ICH in addition to aLVO stroke. This emphasizes the potential of the RACE score for improving prehospital triage and allocation of patients with stroke.\n","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.000947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) score can identify patients with anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion (aLVO) ischemic stroke for transportation to a comprehensive stroke center for endovascular thrombectomy. However, patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) may also benefit from direct transportation to a comprehensive stroke center for neurosurgical treatment. We aimed to assess if the RACE score can distinguish patients with ICH in addition to aLVO stroke from other patients with suspected stroke. We analyzed data from the LPSS (Leiden Prehospital Stroke Study), a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study in 2 Dutch ambulance regions. Ambulance paramedics documented prehospital observations in all patients aged ≥18 years with suspected stroke. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a positive RACE score (≥5 points) for a diagnosis of ICH or aLVO stroke, compared with patients with non‐aLVO stroke, transient ischemic attack, or stroke mimic. In addition, we performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis and calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs). We included 2004 patients with a stroke code, of whom 149 had an ICH, 153 had an aLVO stroke, 687 had a non‐aLVO stroke, 262 had a transient ischemic attack, and 753 had a stroke mimic. Patients with ICH and aLVO stroke more often had a positive RACE score than other patients with suspected stroke (46.2% and 58.0%, respectively, versus 6.4%; P <0.01). A positive RACE score had a sensitivity of 52.7%, a specificity of 93.6%, a positive predictive value of 55.4%, and a negative predictive value of 92.9% for a diagnosis of ICH or aLVO stroke. In multivariable analysis, a positive RACE score had the strongest association with ICH or aLVO stroke (adjusted OR, 10.11 [95% CI, 6.84–14.93]). Our study shows that the RACE score can also identify patients with ICH in addition to aLVO stroke. This emphasizes the potential of the RACE score for improving prehospital triage and allocation of patients with stroke.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅内出血和前大血管闭塞缺血性脑卒中的院前分诊:快速动脉闭塞评估的价值
快速动脉闭塞评估(RACE)评分可以识别前循环大血管闭塞(aLVO)缺血性卒中患者,以便将其运送到综合卒中中心进行血管内血栓切除术。然而,颅内出血(ICH)患者也可能受益于直接转运到综合卒中中心进行神经外科治疗。我们的目的是评估RACE评分是否可以将脑出血合并aLVO卒中患者与其他疑似卒中患者区分开来。我们分析了来自LPSS(莱顿院前卒中研究)的数据,这是一项在荷兰2个救护车区域进行的多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究。救护车护理人员记录了所有年龄≥18岁的疑似中风患者的院前观察结果。我们计算了RACE阳性评分(≥5分)诊断ICH或aLVO卒中的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,并与非aLVO卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作或卒中模拟患者进行了比较。此外,我们进行了多变量logistic回归分析,并计算了调整后的优势比(ORs)。我们纳入了2004例卒中患者,其中149例为脑出血,153例为aLVO卒中,687例为非aLVO卒中,262例为短暂性脑缺血发作,753例为卒中模拟。与其他疑似卒中患者相比,ICH和aLVO卒中患者的RACE评分更常为阳性(分别为46.2%和58.0%,6.4%;P < 0.01)。RACE评分阳性诊断ICH或aLVO脑卒中的敏感性为52.7%,特异性为93.6%,阳性预测值为55.4%,阴性预测值为92.9%。在多变量分析中,RACE阳性评分与脑出血或aLVO卒中的相关性最强(校正or为10.11 [95% CI, 6.84-14.93])。我们的研究表明,RACE评分除了可以识别aLVO脑卒中外,还可以识别ICH患者。这强调了RACE评分在改善院前分诊和卒中患者分配方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Therapy Effectiveness for Unruptured Saccular Intracranial Aneurysms. Large, Wide-Neck, Side-Wall Aneurysm Treatment in Canines Using NeuroCURE: A Novel Liquid Embolic. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual CLOTS Meeting: CLOTS 7.0, Madrid, Spain Catching Up With Time: Endovascular Treatment Beyond 24 Hours Can Aneurysm Wall Radiomics Help Predict Rupture Risk?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1