Emerging Market Funds: They May Not Enhance Asset Allocation

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Index Investing Pub Date : 2019-05-31 DOI:10.3905/jii.2019.1.068
Todd J. Feldman
{"title":"Emerging Market Funds: They May Not Enhance Asset Allocation","authors":"Todd J. Feldman","doi":"10.3905/jii.2019.1.068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article uses portfolio optimization techniques to determine optimal country allocation in an emerging market (EM) portfolio and compares the resulting performance to the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (MSCI EM Index) to test how large the spread is between the two returns. In addition, the article analyzes optimal allocation of the EM portfolio alongside a developed markets index when using the MSCI EM Index as a proxy as well as a mean-variance EM index as a proxy for EM exposure. The results indicate that popular EM index fund performance and exchange-traded fund (ETF) performance do not align with theory from 1993 to 2017, with a spread in Sharpe ratios from 0.37 to 0.10 between the mean-variance optimized EM performance and the MSCI EM Index. In addition, the optimal weightings are very different, 50 percent when using the mean variance relative to 0 percent. The article concludes that an equal-weighted EM portfolio may be the best choice for an investor, with a maximum allocation of 30 percent to EMs based on an equal-weighted EM portfolio. TOPICS: Emerging markets, exchange-traded funds and applications, performance measurement, portfolio construction","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2019.1.068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2019.1.068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article uses portfolio optimization techniques to determine optimal country allocation in an emerging market (EM) portfolio and compares the resulting performance to the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (MSCI EM Index) to test how large the spread is between the two returns. In addition, the article analyzes optimal allocation of the EM portfolio alongside a developed markets index when using the MSCI EM Index as a proxy as well as a mean-variance EM index as a proxy for EM exposure. The results indicate that popular EM index fund performance and exchange-traded fund (ETF) performance do not align with theory from 1993 to 2017, with a spread in Sharpe ratios from 0.37 to 0.10 between the mean-variance optimized EM performance and the MSCI EM Index. In addition, the optimal weightings are very different, 50 percent when using the mean variance relative to 0 percent. The article concludes that an equal-weighted EM portfolio may be the best choice for an investor, with a maximum allocation of 30 percent to EMs based on an equal-weighted EM portfolio. TOPICS: Emerging markets, exchange-traded funds and applications, performance measurement, portfolio construction
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新兴市场基金:它们可能不会加强资产配置
本文使用投资组合优化技术来确定新兴市场(EM)投资组合中的最佳国家配置,并将结果表现与MSCI新兴市场指数(MSCI EM指数)的表现进行比较,以测试两种回报之间的利差有多大。此外,本文还分析了新兴市场投资组合与发达市场指数的最佳配置,同时使用MSCI新兴市场指数作为代理,以及新兴市场平均方差指数作为新兴市场敞口的代理。结果表明,从1993年到2017年,流行的新兴市场指数基金和交易所交易基金(ETF)的表现与理论不一致,平均方差优化的新兴市场表现与MSCI新兴市场指数之间的夏普比率从0.37到0.10不等。此外,最佳权重是非常不同的,50%时使用的平均方差相对于0%。文章的结论是,等权重的新兴市场投资组合可能是投资者的最佳选择,基于等权重的新兴市场投资组合,新兴市场的最大配置为30%。主题:新兴市场、交易所交易基金及应用、绩效评估、投资组合构建
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Index Investing
Journal of Index Investing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Refusal as Repair Australia in the World’s Art Colonies 1900—Pyrrhic Victory Fugitive Abstraction Destruction or Secession?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1