Existential escape of the bored: A review of meaning-regulation processes under boredom

IF 10.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.1080/10463283.2020.1829347
Andrew B. Moynihan, E. Igou, Wijnand A. P. van Tilburg
{"title":"Existential escape of the bored: A review of meaning-regulation processes under boredom","authors":"Andrew B. Moynihan, E. Igou, Wijnand A. P. van Tilburg","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2020.1829347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Boredom is a common, unpleasant emotion that conveys meaninglessness in life and compels people to escape from this adverse existential experience. Within the paradigm of social psychology frameworks, previous research found that bored people endorse cultural sources of meaning as compensation against this state (e.g., nostalgia, political ideologies). In recent years, another form of defence against meaning threats has been identified. An existential escape hypothesis relating to boredom claims that people seek to avoid meaninglessness when people encounter meaning threats such as boredom. By engaging in behaviours with low self-awareness, people counteract awareness of their bored and meaningless self. In this article, we review the current literature on boredom in light of such acts of existential escape. We also provide suggestions for future research to highlight under which circumstances people are more likely to engage in existential escape and identify phenomena that need to be tested within the escape process.","PeriodicalId":47582,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Social Psychology","volume":"32 1","pages":"161 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2020.1829347","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1829347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT Boredom is a common, unpleasant emotion that conveys meaninglessness in life and compels people to escape from this adverse existential experience. Within the paradigm of social psychology frameworks, previous research found that bored people endorse cultural sources of meaning as compensation against this state (e.g., nostalgia, political ideologies). In recent years, another form of defence against meaning threats has been identified. An existential escape hypothesis relating to boredom claims that people seek to avoid meaninglessness when people encounter meaning threats such as boredom. By engaging in behaviours with low self-awareness, people counteract awareness of their bored and meaningless self. In this article, we review the current literature on boredom in light of such acts of existential escape. We also provide suggestions for future research to highlight under which circumstances people are more likely to engage in existential escape and identify phenomena that need to be tested within the escape process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无聊的存在主义逃避:无聊下的意义调节过程述评
无聊是一种常见的、令人不快的情绪,它传达了生活中的无意义,迫使人们逃离这种不利的生存体验。在社会心理学框架的范式中,先前的研究发现,无聊的人认可意义的文化来源作为对这种状态的补偿(例如,怀旧、政治意识形态)。近年来,针对有意义的威胁的另一种防御形式已经被确定。一个与无聊有关的存在主义逃避假说声称,当人们遇到无聊等意义威胁时,人们会寻求避免无意义。通过从事自我意识低下的行为,人们会抵消对无聊和无意义自我的意识。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了当前关于无聊的文献,从这些存在主义的逃避行为来看。我们还为未来的研究提供了建议,以强调在哪些情况下,人们更有可能参与生存逃避,并确定需要在逃避过程中进行测试的现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The "European Review of Social Psychology (ERSP)" is a distinguished international journal that operates under the patronage of the European Association of Social Psychology. It serves as a platform for comprehensive, theory-driven reviews that cover the broad spectrum of social psychology. The journal is open to submissions from authors worldwide and is guided by a prestigious international editorial board. ERSP is particularly interested in publishing reviews that reflect the author's own research program, as demonstrated by their publications in leading peer-reviewed journals. The journal values theoretical contributions that are grounded in a substantial empirical foundation, situating the research within the broader context of existing literature and offering a synthesis that goes beyond the individual articles. In addition to these in-depth reviews, ERSP also welcomes conventional reviews and meta-analyses, further enriching the journal's offerings. By focusing on high-quality, evidence-based research, ERSP contributes significantly to the advancement of knowledge in social psychology and fosters a deeper understanding of human social behavior across cultures and societies.
期刊最新文献
Narrative interventions in conflict settings: Harnessing the power of narratives to prevent violence and promote peace A multi-dimensional typology of allyship action in violent intergroup conflict settings: Differentiating actor, target, and type of action Foucault’s error: The power of not knowing The model of ambivalent choice and dissonant commitment: An integration of dissonance and ambivalence frameworks A theoretical analysis and empirical agenda for understanding the socioecology of adult attachment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1