Single Center Experience of Ultrasonography-guided Bedside Procedures for Surgical Patients

D. Kim, D. Cho, Y. Jung, Jae Gil Lee
{"title":"Single Center Experience of Ultrasonography-guided Bedside Procedures for Surgical Patients","authors":"D. Kim, D. Cho, Y. Jung, Jae Gil Lee","doi":"10.46268/JSU.2018.5.2.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Ultrasound guidance for bedside procedures reduces the risk of complications. This e aim of this study is to stateexamined the experiences of the ultrasonography-guided bedside procedures performed by surgeons in the intensive care unit. Methods: Patients who underwent ultrasonography-guided bedside procedures from October 2016 to October 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. The baseline characteristics of the population, procedures performed, occurrence of complications, and coagulation-re-lated parameters were obtained from the electronic medical records. Results: A total 113 procedures were collected and analyzed. The most frequently performed procedure was ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization (CVC) (75 cases, 66.4%), followed by thoracentesis (41 cases, 36.3%) and paracentesis (7 cases, 6.2 %). A total of five complications (4.4%) occurred after the procedures, three events after CVC insertion, and two events after thoracentesis. After CVC, two pneumothorax and one hemothorax occurred, which were managed by chest tube insertion. Two events after thoracentesis were a pneumothorax, which required chest tube insertion, and a combined ten-sion-pneumothorax with a hemothorax, which required thoracoscopic surgery for bleeder ligation. Conclusion: Ultrasonography-guided bedside procedures are a simple and fast modality available for surgeons. Despite the safety of ultrasonography-guided procedure, there is some concern regarding the development of complications.","PeriodicalId":33937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46268/JSU.2018.5.2.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasound guidance for bedside procedures reduces the risk of complications. This e aim of this study is to stateexamined the experiences of the ultrasonography-guided bedside procedures performed by surgeons in the intensive care unit. Methods: Patients who underwent ultrasonography-guided bedside procedures from October 2016 to October 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. The baseline characteristics of the population, procedures performed, occurrence of complications, and coagulation-re-lated parameters were obtained from the electronic medical records. Results: A total 113 procedures were collected and analyzed. The most frequently performed procedure was ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization (CVC) (75 cases, 66.4%), followed by thoracentesis (41 cases, 36.3%) and paracentesis (7 cases, 6.2 %). A total of five complications (4.4%) occurred after the procedures, three events after CVC insertion, and two events after thoracentesis. After CVC, two pneumothorax and one hemothorax occurred, which were managed by chest tube insertion. Two events after thoracentesis were a pneumothorax, which required chest tube insertion, and a combined ten-sion-pneumothorax with a hemothorax, which required thoracoscopic surgery for bleeder ligation. Conclusion: Ultrasonography-guided bedside procedures are a simple and fast modality available for surgeons. Despite the safety of ultrasonography-guided procedure, there is some concern regarding the development of complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下外科患者床边手术的单中心经验
目的:床边手术的超声引导可降低并发症的风险。本研究的目的是陈述外科医生在重症监护室进行超声引导床边手术的经验。方法:回顾性分析2016年10月至2017年10月接受超声引导下床边手术的患者。从电子医疗记录中获得人群的基线特征、所执行的程序、并发症的发生率和凝血相关参数。结果:共收集并分析了113例手术。最常见的手术是超声引导下的中心静脉置管(CVC)(75例,66.4%),其次是胸腔穿刺术(41例,36.3%)和穿刺术(7例,6.2%)。共有5例并发症(4.4%)发生在手术后,3例发生在CVC插入后,2例发生在胸腔穿刺后。CVC术后发生2例胸腔积液和1例血胸,均采用胸管插管治疗。胸腔穿刺术后的两个事件是需要插入胸管的胸腔积液和需要胸腔镜手术进行放血结扎的合并胸腔积液。结论:超声引导下的床边手术是一种简单快捷的手术方式。尽管超声引导下的手术是安全的,但仍有一些关于并发症发展的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Leg Ulcers Accompanied by Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Lymphedema Caused by IgG4-Related Disease Ultrasound Risk Stratification System of Thyroid Nodule Effects of Ultrasound Targeted Destruction of Echogenic Nanobubbles Containing Doxorubicin in Rat Liver Correlation of Resistive Index Values Using Spectral Doppler Ultrasound with Histopathological Results in Breast Tumors Diagnostic Utility of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1