Consumers' preferences and willingness to pay for improved environmental standards: insights from cane sugar in the Great Barrier Reef region*

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2022-06-20 DOI:10.1111/1467-8489.12484
Jeremy De Valck, John Rolfe, Darshana Rajapaksa, Megan Star
{"title":"Consumers' preferences and willingness to pay for improved environmental standards: insights from cane sugar in the Great Barrier Reef region*","authors":"Jeremy De Valck,&nbsp;John Rolfe,&nbsp;Darshana Rajapaksa,&nbsp;Megan Star","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reducing nutrient runoff from sugarcane production into the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) has become a major policy focus for the Queensland and Australian Governments. This study explores consumer willingness to pay (WTP) to achieve higher environmental standards for sugar originating from the GBR catchments, through the use of a GBR-safe ecolabel. A Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) and a Contingent Valuation (CV) experiment are conducted on a random sample of 1,100 Australian residents. The BWS experiment reveals that personal health considerations are more important than sustainability and environmental factors, including impacts on the GBR. Results of the CV experiment show that respondents are more likely to pay a premium to support Reef-friendly sugar if they are living in urban areas, plan to visit the GBR in the future, think that the GBR condition has declined, and are generally concerned about keeping a healthy diet. We estimate that the average WTP is $24.5/year/household, which only represents 0.34 per cent of the average weekly grocery bill of Australian households. This small contribution through increased sugar prices could conservatively raise $46.9M/year in support of sugar producers to improve water quality in the GBR. Based on these results, we recommend policy-makers consider instruments that further involve sugar consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"66 3","pages":"505-531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.12484","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.12484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Reducing nutrient runoff from sugarcane production into the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) has become a major policy focus for the Queensland and Australian Governments. This study explores consumer willingness to pay (WTP) to achieve higher environmental standards for sugar originating from the GBR catchments, through the use of a GBR-safe ecolabel. A Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) and a Contingent Valuation (CV) experiment are conducted on a random sample of 1,100 Australian residents. The BWS experiment reveals that personal health considerations are more important than sustainability and environmental factors, including impacts on the GBR. Results of the CV experiment show that respondents are more likely to pay a premium to support Reef-friendly sugar if they are living in urban areas, plan to visit the GBR in the future, think that the GBR condition has declined, and are generally concerned about keeping a healthy diet. We estimate that the average WTP is $24.5/year/household, which only represents 0.34 per cent of the average weekly grocery bill of Australian households. This small contribution through increased sugar prices could conservatively raise $46.9M/year in support of sugar producers to improve water quality in the GBR. Based on these results, we recommend policy-makers consider instruments that further involve sugar consumers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者对改善环境标准的偏好和支付意愿:来自大堡礁地区蔗糖的洞察*
减少甘蔗生产产生的养分流入大堡礁(GBR)已成为昆士兰州和澳大利亚政府的主要政策重点。本研究探讨了消费者的支付意愿(WTP),通过使用GBR安全生态标签来实现来自GBR流域的糖的更高环境标准。本文对1100名澳大利亚居民进行了最佳-最差尺度(BWS)和条件评估(CV)实验。BWS实验表明,个人健康考虑比可持续性和环境因素(包括对GBR的影响)更重要。CV实验结果表明,如果受访者生活在城市地区,计划在未来访问GBR,认为GBR状况有所下降,并且通常关心保持健康饮食,则他们更有可能支付额外费用来支持珊瑚礁友好型糖。我们估计平均WTP为24.5美元/年/户,仅占澳大利亚家庭平均每周杂货账单的0.34%。保守地说,通过提高食糖价格,每年可以筹集4690万美元,用于支持食糖生产商改善GBR的水质。基于这些结果,我们建议政策制定者考虑进一步涉及糖消费者的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals. Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives: -To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers. -In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Measuring quantity in ecosystem markets and ecosystem accounts Electricity contract design and wholesale market outcomes in Australia's National Electricity Market Beyond risk management: Crop insurance premium subsidies reduce cropland abandonment in China Effect of dependence on natural resources on employment quality: Insights from African countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1