High-pressure continuous suction drainage for thoracic empyema with pulmonary fistula

T. Uchida, Yugo Tanaka, S. Tauchi, Y. Maniwa
{"title":"High-pressure continuous suction drainage for thoracic empyema with pulmonary fistula","authors":"T. Uchida, Yugo Tanaka, S. Tauchi, Y. Maniwa","doi":"10.21037/AMJ-20-151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The treatment of thoracic empyema with pulmonary fistula (PF) is challenging and involves administration of antibiotics and efficient drainage of pus. Open window thoracostomy (OWT) is typically offered for these cases, but it has several disadvantages, notably postoperative pain that is associated with rib resection. We described six consecutive cases of thoracic empyema with PF that were successfully treated with high-pressure continuous suction drainage (HCSD) instead of conventional OWT. Methods: Between January 2015 and December 2018, six consecutive patients (mean age of 65.0 years) with thoracic empyema and PF underwent HCSD treatment. Suction was initially set at −20 cmH 2 O and was increased incrementally up to −50 cmH 2 O with careful attention to any potential changes in the patients’ circulatory and respiratory dynamics. Results: All six patients were successfully treated with HCSD alone, and there were no related complications. The mean duration of air leakage was 57.2 days (range, 22–100 days). The drainage tubes were removed after a mean period of 60.2 days (range, 27–105 days). All patients were discharged from the hospital without later readmission. Conclusions: HCSD treatment was safe, minimally invasive, and effective for patients with thoracic empyema with PF and may be considered as an alternative treatment to OWT. 6","PeriodicalId":72157,"journal":{"name":"AME medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AME medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AMJ-20-151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The treatment of thoracic empyema with pulmonary fistula (PF) is challenging and involves administration of antibiotics and efficient drainage of pus. Open window thoracostomy (OWT) is typically offered for these cases, but it has several disadvantages, notably postoperative pain that is associated with rib resection. We described six consecutive cases of thoracic empyema with PF that were successfully treated with high-pressure continuous suction drainage (HCSD) instead of conventional OWT. Methods: Between January 2015 and December 2018, six consecutive patients (mean age of 65.0 years) with thoracic empyema and PF underwent HCSD treatment. Suction was initially set at −20 cmH 2 O and was increased incrementally up to −50 cmH 2 O with careful attention to any potential changes in the patients’ circulatory and respiratory dynamics. Results: All six patients were successfully treated with HCSD alone, and there were no related complications. The mean duration of air leakage was 57.2 days (range, 22–100 days). The drainage tubes were removed after a mean period of 60.2 days (range, 27–105 days). All patients were discharged from the hospital without later readmission. Conclusions: HCSD treatment was safe, minimally invasive, and effective for patients with thoracic empyema with PF and may be considered as an alternative treatment to OWT. 6
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高压持续吸引引流术治疗胸脓肿合并肺瘘
背景:胸腔积脓伴肺瘘(PF)的治疗具有挑战性,需要使用抗生素和有效排脓。开窗胸腔造口术(OWT)通常用于这些病例,但它有几个缺点,尤其是与肋骨切除术相关的术后疼痛。我们描述了连续6例PF胸积脓病例,这些病例用高压连续抽吸引流(HCSD)代替传统OWT成功治疗。方法:在2015年1月至2018年12月期间,连续6例(平均年龄65.0岁)胸部积脓和PF患者接受了HCSD治疗。吸力最初设定为−20 cmH 2 O,并逐渐增加至−50 cmH 2 O,同时仔细注意患者循环和呼吸动力学的任何潜在变化。结果:6例患者均成功单用HCSD治疗,无相关并发症。漏气的平均持续时间为57.2天(范围为22-100天)。平均60.2天后(范围为27-105天)取出引流管。所有患者出院后均未再次入院。结论:HCSD治疗PF胸积脓安全、微创、有效,可作为OWT的替代治疗方法。6.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of bronchoscopy training and competency: a narrative review Evaluation & management of clinically significant hemoptysis—a clinical practice review Donation after circulatory death: a narrative review of current controversies, attitudes, and the evolving role of regional perfusion technology Airway stent associated respiratory tract infections Added value of endoscopic ultrasound to endobronchial ultrasound in non-small cell lung cancer staging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1