A. Sánchez-Pay, José Antonio Ortega-Soto, B. Sánchez-Alcaraz
{"title":"Notational analysis in female grand slam tennis competitions","authors":"A. Sánchez-Pay, José Antonio Ortega-Soto, B. Sánchez-Alcaraz","doi":"10.26582/k.53.1.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grand\nSlam tennis tournaments are played on different surfaces. The aims of the\npresent study were to analyse the technical differences in the Grand Slam\ntournaments (Australian Open or AO, Roland Garros or RG, Wimbledon or W, and the\nUnited States Open or US), as well as to establish differences between winning\nand losing players. A total of 580 sets in 248 matches played in Grand Slams\nbetween 2017 and 2018 were analysed. To observe differences between the tournaments,\na one-way analysis of variance (Kruskal Wallis) with the Bonferroni post-hoc\ntest was performed. Univariate (Wilcoxon test) analysis of data was carried out\nto show the differences between the winning and losing performances\nof sets. Players who\nhad more aces, points won on the 1st serve, winning shots and net points won\nmore matches in the AO, W and US than in the RG (p<.05). However, in RG,\nplayers won more receiving points (43.56% of the points played) with chances to\nbreak the opponents’ service game. The results also showed that the winning\nplayers were superior in both service and receiving, and the most influential\nvariables on the outcome of the match were percentage of receiving points won,\nbreak points won, and percentage of points won on the first serve. Such knowledge may have\nimplications in the design of appropriate game strategies and specific training\nsessions to improve performance in professional women’s tennis.","PeriodicalId":49943,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26582/k.53.1.18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Grand
Slam tennis tournaments are played on different surfaces. The aims of the
present study were to analyse the technical differences in the Grand Slam
tournaments (Australian Open or AO, Roland Garros or RG, Wimbledon or W, and the
United States Open or US), as well as to establish differences between winning
and losing players. A total of 580 sets in 248 matches played in Grand Slams
between 2017 and 2018 were analysed. To observe differences between the tournaments,
a one-way analysis of variance (Kruskal Wallis) with the Bonferroni post-hoc
test was performed. Univariate (Wilcoxon test) analysis of data was carried out
to show the differences between the winning and losing performances
of sets. Players who
had more aces, points won on the 1st serve, winning shots and net points won
more matches in the AO, W and US than in the RG (p<.05). However, in RG,
players won more receiving points (43.56% of the points played) with chances to
break the opponents’ service game. The results also showed that the winning
players were superior in both service and receiving, and the most influential
variables on the outcome of the match were percentage of receiving points won,
break points won, and percentage of points won on the first serve. Such knowledge may have
implications in the design of appropriate game strategies and specific training
sessions to improve performance in professional women’s tennis.
期刊介绍:
Kinesiology – International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Kinesiology (print ISSN 1331- 1441, online ISSN 1848-638X) publishes twice a year scientific papers and other written material from kinesiology (a scientific discipline which investigates art and science of human movement; in the meaning and scope close to the idiom “sport sciences”) and other adjacent human sciences focused on sport and exercise, primarily from anthropology (biological and cultural alike), medicine, sociology, psychology, natural sciences and mathematics applied to sport in its broadest sense, history, and others. Contributions of high scientific interest, including also results of theoretical analyses and their practical application in physical education, sport, physical recreation and kinesitherapy, are accepted for publication. The following sections define the scope of the journal: Sport and sports activities, Physical education, Recreation/leisure, Kinesiological anthropology, Training methods, Biology of sport and exercise, Sports medicine and physiology of sport, Biomechanics, History of sport and Book reviews with news.