Il ceppo e l’intaglio. Riflessioni metafisiche sul Daodejing

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Rivista di Estetica Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.4000/ESTETICA.5979
E. Onnis
{"title":"Il ceppo e l’intaglio. Riflessioni metafisiche sul Daodejing","authors":"E. Onnis","doi":"10.4000/ESTETICA.5979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complex and long genesis of the Daodejing is widely known. Whether it was originally composed by a single author, the legendary Laozi, or whether it emerged over time as a sort of collective anthology ancient sayings, the text underwent countless changes made by copyists and commentators over the centuries, and the Daodejing extensively published today is clearly something different from its first (and second) versions. For this reason, as well as for the nature of Chinese thought itself, it seems inappropriate to search for a philosophical “system” in the Daodejing. Nonetheless, the text can shed light on the view of nature permeating classical China. The paper will focus on three issues. The first is the ontological non-individualization of the Dao, which is the counterpart to the epistemological individualization of the human and social world. The second is the kind of metaphysics that can frame these features: a metaphysics of diachronic events, processes, and emergences, rather than a synchronic metaphysics of objects, substances, and monadic properties. The third, finally, is the fragmenting power of language, which through naming and knowledge creates that individualization that splits the undivided unity of the Dao.","PeriodicalId":53954,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di Estetica","volume":"59 1","pages":"63-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di Estetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/ESTETICA.5979","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The complex and long genesis of the Daodejing is widely known. Whether it was originally composed by a single author, the legendary Laozi, or whether it emerged over time as a sort of collective anthology ancient sayings, the text underwent countless changes made by copyists and commentators over the centuries, and the Daodejing extensively published today is clearly something different from its first (and second) versions. For this reason, as well as for the nature of Chinese thought itself, it seems inappropriate to search for a philosophical “system” in the Daodejing. Nonetheless, the text can shed light on the view of nature permeating classical China. The paper will focus on three issues. The first is the ontological non-individualization of the Dao, which is the counterpart to the epistemological individualization of the human and social world. The second is the kind of metaphysics that can frame these features: a metaphysics of diachronic events, processes, and emergences, rather than a synchronic metaphysics of objects, substances, and monadic properties. The third, finally, is the fragmenting power of language, which through naming and knowledge creates that individualization that splits the undivided unity of the Dao.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
树桩和切口。对道德京的形而上学反思
《道德经》的起源复杂而漫长,是众所周知的。无论《道德经》最初是由传说中的老子一个人创作的,还是随着时间的推移,作为一种集体的古语选集而出现的,几个世纪以来,抄写员和评论家对《道德经》进行了无数次修改,今天广泛出版的《道德经》显然与第一版(和第二版)有所不同。由于这个原因,以及中国思想本身的性质,在《道德经》中寻找哲学“体系”似乎是不合适的。尽管如此,这篇文章还是可以揭示中国古典的自然观。本文将集中讨论三个问题。第一种是道的本体论非个体化,与人与社会世界的认识论个体化相对应。第二种是能够构成这些特征的形而上学:一种关于历时性事件、过程和出现的形而上学,而不是关于对象、实体和一元属性的共时性形而上学。第三个,也是最后一个,是语言的分裂力量,它通过命名和知识创造出个性化,从而分裂了道的不可分割的统一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rivista di Estetica
Rivista di Estetica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Origins Of Umberto Eco’s Semio-Philosophical Project Alive as You and Me Indexes: Cultural Nature and Natural Culture The Dog Schema The Notion of System in the Work of Umberto Eco: Summa, Structure, Code, Encyclopaedia and Rhizome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1