Coping is crucial : exploring relations between K-12 educators and staff coping strategies, perceived stress and psychological wellbeing

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL International Journal of Emotional Education Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.56300/qbvz8040
Michael J. Savage, Vera E. Woloshyn
{"title":"Coping is crucial : exploring relations between K-12 educators and staff coping strategies, perceived stress and psychological wellbeing","authors":"Michael J. Savage, Vera E. Woloshyn","doi":"10.56300/qbvz8040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This causal comparative study explored K-12 educators’ and school staff’s self-reported levels of well-being, perceived stress, and use of coping strategies. An online survey was administered to 686 educators consisting of teachers, school administrators, professional support staff, administrative support staff and other school staff in a medium-sized schoolboard in Southern Ontario, Canada. The results show that educators reported overall low scores of wellbeing and higher levels of perceived stress as compared to the general population. Female educators reported significantly higher perceived stress than their male colleagues. A k-means cluster analysis of the educators’ coping strategies identified four unique clusters which were significantly different from each other. It was shown that participants in two of the clusters, consisting of approximately 32% of the participants in this study, used maladaptive coping strategies more frequent and that the participants in these two clusters exhibited significantly poorer wellbeing and significantly more perceived stress than their colleagues in the other two clusters. The limitations and practical implications of this study are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44209,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emotional Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emotional Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56300/qbvz8040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This causal comparative study explored K-12 educators’ and school staff’s self-reported levels of well-being, perceived stress, and use of coping strategies. An online survey was administered to 686 educators consisting of teachers, school administrators, professional support staff, administrative support staff and other school staff in a medium-sized schoolboard in Southern Ontario, Canada. The results show that educators reported overall low scores of wellbeing and higher levels of perceived stress as compared to the general population. Female educators reported significantly higher perceived stress than their male colleagues. A k-means cluster analysis of the educators’ coping strategies identified four unique clusters which were significantly different from each other. It was shown that participants in two of the clusters, consisting of approximately 32% of the participants in this study, used maladaptive coping strategies more frequent and that the participants in these two clusters exhibited significantly poorer wellbeing and significantly more perceived stress than their colleagues in the other two clusters. The limitations and practical implications of this study are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对至关重要:探索K-12教育工作者和员工应对策略、感知压力和心理健康之间的关系
这项因果比较研究探讨了K-12教育工作者和学校员工自我报告的幸福感水平、感知压力和应对策略的使用。加拿大安大略省南部一个中等规模的学校董事会对686名教育工作者进行了在线调查,包括教师、学校管理人员、专业支持人员、行政支持人员和其他学校工作人员。结果显示,与一般人群相比,教育工作者报告的总体幸福感得分较低,而感知到的压力水平较高。女性教育工作者报告的感知压力明显高于男性同事。对教育工作者应对策略的k-均值聚类分析发现了四个独特的聚类,这些聚类之间存在显著差异。结果表明,其中两个组的参与者(约占本研究参与者的32%)使用适应不良应对策略的频率更高,并且这两个组的参与者表现出明显较差的幸福感和明显比其他两个组的同事更多的感知压力。讨论了本研究的局限性和实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal providing space for high quality, empirically based papers on effective intervention and evaluation in the area of emotional education. The journal has special issues dedicated to specific topics in emotional education, and a book review section. Some of the areas related covered by the journal include amongst others emotional intelligence, social and emotional development, educational resilience, social and emotional health, social and emotional literacy, social and emotional competence, social, emotional and behaviour difficulties, health promotion in schools, mental health in children and young people, mental health in schools, behaviour management and behaviour modification, teaching and learning.
期刊最新文献
CHAPTER 4: The biopsychosocial model and what it means for understanding inclusion in education - Brahm Norwich Introduction This chapter focuses on two specific pieces of Paul Cooper’s writing from 19 and 15 years ago respectively, namely his ideas about the biopsychosocial model and how he developed and used this perspective in unique ways to expand our thinking about inclusion and inclusive education. I believe this will give me the opportunity to show the detail of his analyses and way he … Affective pedagogy in pre-service teacher education: a twofold approach combining explicit and vicarious learning Theory of Constructed Emotion: Emotional vocabulary and emotional intelligence Book Reviews [IJEE, 15,2] Relationality and student engagement in higher education: Towards enhanced students’ learning experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1